This research investigates the effect of varying the concentric recess pressure ratio of hybrid (combination hydrostatic and hydrodynamic) bearings to be used in high-speed, high-pressure applications. Bearing flowrate, load capacity, torque, rotordynamic coefficients, and whirl frequency ratio are examined to determine the concentric, recess-pressure ratio which yields optimum bearing load capacity and dynamic stiffness. An analytical model, using two-dimensional bulk-flow Navier-Stokes equations and anchored by experimental test results, is used to examine bearing performance over a wide range of concentric recess pressure ratios. Typically, a concentric recess pressure ratio of 0.50 is used to obtain maximum bearing load capacity. This analysis reveals that theoretical optimum bearing performance occurs for a pressure ratio near 0.40, while experimental results indicate the optimum value to he somewhat higher than 0.45. This research demonstrates the ability to analytically investigate hybrid bearings and shows the need for more hybrid-bearing experimental data.

1.
Chaomleffel
J. P.
, and
Nicholas
D.
,
1986
, “
Experimental Investigation of Hybrid Journal Bearings
,”
Tribology International
, Vol.
19
, No.
5
, pp.
253
259
.
2.
Childs, D. W., and Hale, R. K., 1993, “A Test Apparatus and Facility to Identify the Rotordynamic Coefficients of High Speed Hydrodynamic Bearings,” ASME Journal of Tribology, in press.
3.
Franchek
N.
, and
Childs
D.
,
1994
, “
Experimental Test Result for Four High-Speed, High Pressure, Orifice-Compensated Hybrid Bearing
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, January, Vol.
116
, pp.
147
153
.
4.
Franchek, N., Childs, D., and San Andres, L., 1994, “Theoretical and Experimental Comparisons for Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High-Speed, High-Pressure, Orifice-Compensated Hybrid Bearing,” at the ASME/STLE International Tribology Conference and Exhibition, Maui, Hawaii, 16-20 October, 1994, ASME Paper No. 94-Trib-43.
5.
Heller
S.
,
1974
, “
Static and Dynamic Performance of Externally Pressurized Fluid Film Journal Bearings in the Turbulent Regime
,”
ASME Journal of Lubrication
, Vol.
96
, Series F, No.
3
, pp.
381
389
.
6.
Kurtin
K. A.
,
Childs
D. W.
,
San Andres
L.
, and
Hale
K.
,
1993
, “
Experimental Versus Theoretical Characteristics of a High-Speed Hybrid (Combination Hydrostatic and Hydrodynamic) Bearing
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, January, Vol.
115
, pp.
160
169
.
7.
Lund, J. W., 1965, “The Stability of an Elastic Rotor in Journal Bearings with Flexible, Damped Supports,” ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics, pp. 911–920.
8.
Measurement Uncertainty, 1986, ANSI/ASME PTC 19.1-1985 Part 1, (reaffirmed 1991).
9.
Reddcliff
J. M.
, and
Vohr
J. H.
,
1969
, “
Hydrostatic Bearings for Cryogenic Rocket Engine Turbopumps
,’
ASME Journal of Lubrication
, Vol.
91
, Series F, No.
3
, pp.
557
575
.
10.
Rouvas, C., and Childs, D., 1992, “A Parameter Identification Method for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High Reynolds Number Hydrostatic Bearing,” ASME JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND ACOUSTICS, in press.
11.
Rowe, W. B., 1983, Hydrostatic and Hybrid Bearing Design, Butterworths, London.
12.
San Andres
L. A.
,
1990
, “
Turbulent Hybrid Bearings with Fluid Inertia Effects
,”
ASME Journal of Tribology
, Vol.
112
, No.
4
, pp.
699
707
.
13.
San Andres
L. A.
,
1991
, “
Effect of Eccentricity on the Force Response of a Hybrid Bearing
,”
STLE Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
34
, No.
4
, pp.
537
544
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.