Abstract

Hard-to-abate industrial processes, such as petrochemicals and cement production, have long been considered technically challenging to decarbonize. In response to the urgent demand to eliminate industrial CO2 emissions, a new class of energy-imparting turbomachines has been developed. These devices aim to convert mechanical into internal energy instead of pressurizing the gas, which enables high-temperature gas heating (up to 1700 C) for a variety of applications. This article is organized into three parts. First, this article aims to demonstrate the capabilities of the novel, high-capacity, customizable, repeating-stage axial turbo-heater architecture for a hydrocarbon cracking example application. The study presents the new design requirements and working principles of this energy-imparting concept. The radically different objectives compared to a compressor enable ultra-high loading stage designs by avoiding the stability and efficiency constraints imposed on compressors. Within this new design space, the turbo-heater is able to achieve a loading coefficient ψ ≥ 4.0. Second, detailed numerical simulations of a multistage axial turbo-reactor with various vaneless space lengths are conducted. This work conclusively demonstrates the robustness and flexibility of the aerodynamic design despite employing a uniform blade design. It is emphasized that the concept is tolerant to unsteady interstage turbulent disturbances, enabling nominal work input conditions to be achieved even for the most compact arrangements. Finally, having confirmed that the aerothermal restrictions on the vaneless space length can be removed, the designer is free to tailor the design to optimize the chemical reaction by (1) tailoring the residence time distribution to improve the yield and coking rate, (2) homogenizing reaction progress by mixing-out concentration gradients, and (3) adjusting the rotational speed to account for variations in the reaction dynamics for different feedstocks.

References

1.
Coolbrook Oy
, “
Coolbrook Oy
,” Helsinki, Finland, https://coolbrook.com, Accessed October 15, 2022.
2.
Pörtner
,
H.-O.
,
Roberts
,
D. C.
,
Adams
,
H.
,
Adler
,
C.
,
Aldunce
,
P.
,
Ali
,
E.
, and
Begum
,
R. A.
, et al.,
2022
, “
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
,” IPCC Sixth Assessment Report.
3.
IRENA
,
2022
, “
Smart Electrification With Renewables: Driving the Transformation of Energy Services
,” International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi.
4.
Roelofsen
,
O.
,
Somers
,
K.
,
Speelman
,
E.
, and
Witteveen
,
M.
,
2020
,
Plugging In: What Electrification Can Do for Industry
,
McKinsey
,
New York
.
5.
Paltsev
,
S.
,
Morris
,
J.
,
Kheshgi
,
H.
, and
Herzog
,
H.
,
2021
, “
Hard-to-Abate Sectors: The Role of Industrial Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) in Emission Mitigation
,”
Appl. Energy.
,
300
, p.
117322
.
6.
Lu
,
Q.
,
Zhang
,
B.
,
Yang
,
S.
, and
Peng
,
Z.
,
2022
, “
Life Cycle Assessment on Energy Efficiency of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle in China
,”
Energy
,
257
, p.
124731
.
7.
Dickens
,
T.
, and
Day
,
I.
,
2010
, “
The Design of Highly Loaded Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach
,
133
(
3
), p.
031007
.
8.
Rubini
,
D.
,
Xu
,
L.
,
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Johannesdahl
,
H.
,
2022
, “
A New Turbomachine for Clean and Sustainable Hydrocarbon Cracking
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
144
(
2
), p.
021024
.
9.
Rubini
,
D.
,
Karefyllidis
,
N.
,
Xu
,
L.
,
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Johannesdahl
,
H.
,
2022
, “
A New Robust Regenerative Turbo-Reactor Concept for Clean Hydrocarbon Cracking
,”
Global Power Propulsion Soc.
,
6
, pp.
135
150
.
10.
Rubini
,
D.
,
Karefyllidis
,
N.
,
Xu
,
L.
,
Rosic
,
B.
, and
Johannesdahl
,
H.
,
2022
, “
Accelerating the Development of a New Turbomachinery Concept in an Environment With Limited Resources and Experimental Data: Challenges
,”
Presented at the ASME Turbo Expo 2022, Vol. 86120
,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
,
June 13–17
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, p.
V10DT36A001
.
11.
Bushuev
,
V. A.
,
2016
, “
Bladed Reactor for the Pyrolysis of Hydrocarbons
,” Nov. 15, US Patent Application No. US 9.494,038 B2, US Patent and Trademark Office, WA, DC.
12.
Xu
,
L.
, and
Rosic
,
B.
,
2020
, “
Rotary Device for Conducting Chemical Reactions
,” Aug. 18, US Patent Application No. US 10,744,480, US Patent and Trademark Office, WA, DC.
13.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1983
, “
An Improved Time-Marching Method for Turbomachinery Flow Calculation
,”
ASME. J. Eng. Power
,
105
(
3
), pp.
514
521
.
14.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1986
, “
The Use of a Distributed Body Force to Simulate Viscous Effects in 3D Flow Calculations
,”
International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, Volume 1: Turbomachinery of Turbo Expo: Power for Land, Sea, and Air
,
Dusseldorf, Germany
,
June 8–12
, p.
V001T01A058
.
15.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1992
, “
The Calculation of Three-Dimensional Viscous Flow Through Multistage Turbomachines
,”
ASME. J. Turbomach.
,
114
(
1
), pp.
18
26
.
16.
Rosic
,
B.
,
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2005
, “
The Importance of Shroud Leakage Modeling in Multistage Turbine Flow Calculations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
699
707
.
17.
Menter
,
F.
, and
Egorov
,
Y.
,
2005
, “
A Scale Adaptive Simulation Model Using Two-Equation Models
,”
43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
,
Jan. 10–13
, p.
1095
.
18.
Coder
,
J. G.
,
2015
, “
A Scale-Adaptive Variant of the Spalart-Allmaras Eddy-Viscosity Model
,”
22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Dallas, TX
,
June 22–26
, p.
2462
.
19.
Spalart
,
P.
, and
Allmaras
,
S.
,
1992
, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
,
Jan. 6–9
, p.
439
.
20.
Gao
,
C. W.
,
Allen
,
J. W.
,
Green
,
W. H.
, and
West
,
R. H.
,
2016
, “
Reaction Mechanism Generator: Automatic Construction of Chemical Kinetic Mechanisms
,”
Comput. Phys. Commun.
,
203
, pp.
212
225
.
21.
Goodwin
,
D. G.
,
Moffat
,
H. K.
,
Schoegl
,
I.
,
Speth
,
R. L.
, and
Weber
,
B. W.
,
2022
, “
Cantera: An Object-Oriented Software Toolkit for Chemical Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Transport Processes
,” https://www.cantera.org, Version 2.6.0.
22.
Blank
,
J.
, and
Deb
,
K.
,
2020
, “
pymoo: Multi-objective Optimization in Python
,”
IEEE Access
,
8
, pp.
89497
89509
.
23.
Van Goethem
,
M. W. M.
,
2010
, “
Next Generation Steam Cracking Reactor Concept
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Delft University of Technology
,
Delft, the Netherlands
.
You do not currently have access to this content.