Abstract

The growing demand of high flexibility and wide operating ranges of radial turbines in turbocharger applications necessitates new methods in the turbomachinery design process. Often, design criteria such as high performance at certain operating conditions or low inertia contradict the requirement for high durability. This article demonstrates a newly developed optimization approach for radial turbines that allows to optimize for several design objectives. The presented approach is based on a parametric model of the turbine wheel geometry. On the one hand, the model is designed to capture the most important geometry and design features, and on the other hand, it is flexible for use on various machines. A surrogate model-based genetic algorithm is used to optimize the geometries with respect to several objectives, including efficiency, durability (HCF), low-cycle fatigue (LCF), inertia, and mass. Certain operating points or criteria can be particularly emphasized and specified constraints throughout the process allow for customized optimization. The simulations underlying the optimization are state-of-the-art computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and finite element (FE) analyses, involving the respective components. The newly developed and fully automated approach includes tasks of different disciplines. In the end, a selection of several promising geometries is examined more intimately to finally find a most suitable geometry for the given application. For the current study, this geometry has been manufactured and tested on a hot gas test facility to successfully validate the design process.

References

1.
Whitfield
,
A.
, and
Baines
,
N. C.
,
1990
,
Design of Radial Turbomachines
,
Longman Scientific & Technical
,
New York
.
2.
Aungier
,
R. H.
,
2006
,
Turbine Aerodynamics
,
ASME Press
,
New York
.
3.
Rohlik
,
H. E.
,
1968
, “
Analytical Determination of Radial Inflow Turbine Design Geometry for Maximum Efficiency
,” Technical Note D-4384,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
.
4.
Li
,
Z.
, and
Zheng
,
X.
,
2017
, “
Review of Design Optimization Methods for Turbomachinery Aerodynamics
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
93
, pp.
1
23
.
5.
Emmerich
,
M.
, and
Deutz
,
A. H.
,
2018
, “
A Tutorial on Multiobjective Optimization: Fundamentals and Evolutionary Methods
,”
Nat. Comput.
,
17
(
3
), pp.
585
609
.
6.
He
,
L.
, and
Wang
,
D. X.
,
2011
, “
Concurrent Blade Aerodynamic-Aero-Elastic Design Optimization Using Adjoint Method
,”
ASME, J. Turbomach.
,
133
(
1
), p.
011021
.
7.
Mueller
,
L.
,
Alsalihi
,
Z.
, and
Verstraete
,
T.
,
2013
, “
Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Turbocharger Radial Turbine
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
2
), p.
021022
.
8.
Mueller
,
L.
,
Verstraete
,
T.
, and
Schwalbach
,
M.
,
2019
, “
Adjoint-Based Multidisciplinary, Multipoint Optimization of a Radial Turbine Considering Aerodynamic and Structural Performances
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
June 17–21
.
9.
Wang
,
X.
,
Sun
,
J.
,
Song
,
P.
, and
Xu
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Three-Dimensional Blade Shape Optimization for a Transonic Axial Flow Compressor Through Incorporating Surrogate Model and Sequential Sampling
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Power for Land, Sea and Air
,
Oslo, Norway
,
June 11–15
.
10.
Baert
,
L.
,
Chérière
,
E.
,
Sainvitu
,
C.
,
Lepot
,
I.
,
Nouvellon
,
A.
, and
Leonardon
,
V.
,
2020
, “
Aerodynamic Optimization of the Low-Pressure Turbine Module: Exploiting Surrogate Models in a High-Dimensional Design Space
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
142
(
3
), p. 031005.
11.
Khairuddin
,
U. B.
, and
Costall
,
A. W.
,
2017
, “
Aerodynamic Optimization of the High Pressure Turbine and Interstage Duct in a Two-Stage Air System for a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
140
(
5
), p. 052801.
12.
Childs
,
E.
, and
Kohr
,
S.
,
2020
, “
Multi-disciplinary Optimization of a Turbocharger Compressor
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020 Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Virtual Online
,
Sept. 21–25
.
13.
Kovachev
,
N.
, and
Vogt
,
D. M.
,
2020
, “
Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Operating Point on the Aerodynamic Excitation in a Radial Turbine Stage
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2020 Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Virtual Online
,
Sept. 21–25
.
14.
Müller
,
T. R.
,
Vogt
,
D. M.
,
Vogel
,
K.
,
Phillipsen
,
B. A.
, and
Hönisch
,
P.
,
2017
, “
Influence of Detailing on Aerodynamic Forcing of a Transonic Axial Turbine Stage and Forced-Response Prediction for Low-Engine-Order (LEO) Excitation
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Charlotte, NC
,
June 26–30
.
15.
Lophaven
,
S. N.
,
Hans Bruun Nielsen
,
H. B.
, and
Søndergaard
,
J.
,
2002
, “
DACE: A Matlab Kriging Toolbox
,” IMM Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical Report No. IMM-TR-2002-12.
16.
Deb
,
K.
,
Pratap
,
A.
,
Agarwal
,
S.
, and
Meyarivan
,
T.
,
2002
, “
A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II
,”
IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
182
197
.
17.
Heidinger
,
F.
,
Vogt
,
D. M.
, and
Challand
,
S.
,
2014
, “
Development and Commissioning of a New Turbocharger Test Facility
,”
The 22 Symposium on Measuring Techniques in Turbomachinery: Transonic and Supersonic Flow in Cascades and Turbomachines
,
Lyon, France
,
Sept. 4–5
.
You do not currently have access to this content.