Abstract

This article presents the study of the Source Diagnostic Test fan rig of the NASA Glenn (NASA SDT). Numerical simulations are performed for the three different outlet guide vane (OGV) geometries (baseline, low count, and low noise) and three rotational speeds corresponding to approach, cutback, and sideline operating conditions, respectively. Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) approach is used. The in- and out-duct flow including the nacelle are considered in the numerical simulations, and results are compared against available measurements. Due to the blade count of the fan and OGVs (22 fan blades and either 54 or 26 blades for the OGVs), the simulation can only be reduced to half the full annulus simulation domain using periodic boundary conditions that still represents a significant cost. To alleviate this issue, a URANS with phase-lagged assumption is used. This method allows to perform unsteady simulations on multistage turbomachinery configurations including multiple frequency flows with a reduced computational domain composed of one single-blade passage for each row. The large data storage required by the phase-lagged approach is handled by a compression method based on a proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) replacing the traditional Fourier series decomposition (FSD). This compression method improves the signal spectral content especially at high frequency. Based on the numerical simulations, the flow field is described and used to assess the losses generated in the turbofan architecture based on an entropy approach. The results show different flow topologies for the fan depending on the rotational speed with a leading edge shock at high rotational speed. The fan boundary layer contributes strongly to losses with the majority of the losses being generated close to the leading edge.

References

1.
Podboy
,
G. G.
,
Krupar
,
M. J.
,
Helland
,
S. M.
, and
Hughes
,
C. E.
,
2002
, “
Steady and Unsteady Flow Field Measurements Within a NASA 22 Inch Fan Model
,”
40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
,
Jan. 14–17
, pp.
1
13
.
2.
Podboy
,
G. G.
,
Krupar
,
M. J.
,
Hughes
,
C. E.
, and
Woodward
,
R. P.
,
2002
, “
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—LDV Measured Flow Field Results
,”
8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit
,
Breckenridge, CO
,
June 17–19
, pp.
1
14
.
3.
Heidelberg
,
L. J.
,
2002
, “
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Tone Modal Structure Results
,”
8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit
,
Breckenridge, CO
,
June 17–19
, pp.
1
12
.
4.
Shur
,
M.
,
Strelets
,
M.
,
Travin
,
A.
,
Spalart
,
P.
, and
Suzuki
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Unsteady Simulations of a Fan/Outlet-Guide-Vane System: Aerodynamics and Turbulence
,”
AIAA J.
,
57
(
12
), pp.
1
14
.
5.
Casalino
,
D.
,
Hazir
,
A.
, and
Mann
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Turbofan Broadband Noise Prediction Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method
,”
AIAA J.
,
56
(
2
), pp.
132
143
.
6.
Erdos
,
J.
, and
Alzner
,
E.
,
1977
, “
Computation of Unsteady Transonic Flows Through Rotating and Stationary Cascades. 1: Method of analysis
,”
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Technical Report No. 19780012139, US Government, NASA
.
7.
Berkooz
,
G.
,
2002
, “
The Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in the Analysis of Turbulent Flows
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
25
(
1
), pp.
539
575
.
8.
Mouret
,
G.
,
Gourdain
,
N.
, and
Castillon
,
L.
,
2015
, “
Adaptation of Phase-Lagged Boundary Conditions to Large Eddy Simulation in Turbomachinery Configurations
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
4
), p.
041003
.
9.
Cambier
,
L.
, and
Veuillot
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Status of the ElsA Software for Flow Simulation and Multi-Disciplinary Applications
,”
46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
Reno, NV
,
Jan. 7–10
, pp.
1
21
.
10.
Cambier
,
L.
,
Heib
,
S.
, and
Plot
,
S.
,
2013
, “
The Onera ElsA CFD Software: Input From Research and Feedback From Industry
,”
Mech. Ind.
,
14
(
3
), pp.
159
174
.
11.
Nishikawa
,
H.
,
Rad
,
M.
, and
Roe
,
P.
,
2001
, “
A Third-Order Fluctuation Splitting Scheme That Preserves Potential Flow
,”
15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Anaheim, CA
,
June 11–14
, pp.
1
6
.
12.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
,
2008
, “
Formulation of the K-ω Turbulence Model Revisited
,”
AIAA J.
,
46
(
11
), pp.
1
14
.
13.
Gourdain
,
N.
,
2015
, “
Prediction of the Unsteady Turbulent Flow in an Axial Compressor Stage. Part 1: Comparison of Unsteady RANS and LES With Experiments
,”
Comput. Fluids.
,
106
(
1
), pp.
119
129
.
14.
Gourdain
,
N.
,
2015
, “
Prediction of the Unsteady Turbulent Flow in an Axial Compressor Stage. Part 2: Analysis of Unsteady RANS and LES Data
,”
Comput. Fluids.
,
106
(
1
), pp.
67
78
.
15.
Marmignon
,
C.
,
Couaillier
,
V.
, and
Courbet
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Solution Strategies for Integration of Semi-Discretized Flow Equations in ElsA and CEDRE
,”
AerospaceLab J.
,
2
(
1
), pp.
1
11
.
16.
Cliquet
,
J.
,
Houdeville
,
R.
, and
Arnal
,
D.
,
2008
, “
Application of Laminar-Turbulent Transition Criteria in Navier-Stokes Computations
,”
AIAA J.
,
46
(
5
), pp.
1182
1190
.
17.
Cousteix
,
J.
,
1986
, “
Three-Dimensional and Unsteady Boundary-Layer Computations
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
,
18
(
2
), pp.
173
196
.
18.
Michelassi
,
V.
,
Martelli
,
F.
,
Dénos
,
D. J.
,
Arts
,
T.
, and
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
1999
, “
Unsteady Heat Transfer in Stator-Rotor Interaction by Two-Equation Turbulence Model
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
121
(
3
), pp.
436
447
.
19.
Denton
,
J. D.
,
1993
, “
Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
(
4
), pp.
621
656
.
20.
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Ubaldi
,
M.
,
Zunino
,
P.
,
Bertini
,
F.
, and
Michelassi
,
V.
,
2017
, “
Accurate Estimation of Profile Losses and Analysis of Loss Generation Mechanisms in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
12
), p.
121007
.
21.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Moore
,
J. G.
,
1983
, “
Entropy Production Rates From Viscous Flow Calculations: Part I—A Turbulent Boundary Layer Flow
,”
ASME 1983 International Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibit, Volume 1: Turbomachinery
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
Mar. 27–31
, ASME, pp.
1
8
.
22.
Hughes
,
C. E.
,
Jeracki
,
R. J.
,
Woodward
,
R. P.
, and
Miller
,
C. J.
,
2002
, “
Fan Noise Source Diagnostic Test—Rotor Alone Aerodynamic Performance Results
,”
8th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit
,
Breckenridge, CO
,
June 17–19
, pp.
1
14
.
23.
Smith
,
B. R.
,
1995
, “
Prediction of Hypersonic Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions With the K-l Two Equation Turbulence Model
,”
33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
,
San Diego, CA
,
Jan. 17–19
, pp.
1
16
.
24.
Denton
,
J. D.
, and
Pullan
,
G.
,
2012
, “
A Numerical Investigation Into the Sources of Endwall Loss in Axial Flow Turbines
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2012: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 8: Turbomachinery, Parts A, B, and C
,
Copenhagen, Denmark
,
June 11–15
, pp.
1
13
.
25.
Hammer
,
F.
,
Sandham
,
N.
, and
Sandberg
,
R.
,
2018
, “
The Influence of Different Wake Profiles on Losses in a Low Pressure Turbine Cascade
,”
Int. J. Turbomach. Propul. Power
,
3
(
2
), pp.
1
16
.
26.
Lengani
,
D.
,
Simoni
,
D.
,
Pichler
,
R.
,
Sandberg
,
R. D.
,
Michelassi
,
V.
, and
Bertini
,
F.
,
2018
, “
Identification and Quantification of Losses in a LPT Cascade by POD Applied to LES Data
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
70
(
2
), pp.
28
40
.
27.
Lovely
,
D.
, and
Haimes
,
R.
,
1999
, “
Shock Detection From Computational Fluid Dynamics Results
,”
14th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Norfolk, VA
,
Nov. 1–5
, pp.
1
15
.
You do not currently have access to this content.