Abstract

In the drive for lower fuel consumption through increased bypass ratio and increased overall pressure ratio (OPR), engine designs for the next generation of single-aisle aircraft will require core sizes below 3 lb/s and OPRs above 50. Traditionally, these core sizes are the domain of centrifugal compressors, but materials limit pressure ratio in these machines to well below 50. An all-axial high-pressure compressor (HPC) at this core size, however, comes with limitations associated with the small blade spans at the back of the HPC, as clearances, fillets, and leading edges do not scale with the core size. The result is a substantial efficiency penalty, driven primarily by the tip leakage flow produced by the larger clearance-to-span ratio, which negates the cycle efficiency benefits of the high OPR. In order to enable small-core, high-OPR, all-axial compressors mitigating technologies need to be developed and implemented to reduce the large clearance-to-span efficiency penalty. However, for this technology development to be successful, it is imperative that predictive design tools accurately model the overall flow physics and trends of the technologies developed. In this paper, we describe an effort to determine whether different modeling standards are required for a large clearance-to-span ratio, and if so, identify criteria for an appropriate solver and/or mesh. Multiple models are run and results compared with data collected in the NASA Glenn Research Center’s low-speed axial compressor. These comparisons show that steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers can predict the pressure-rise characteristic to an acceptable level of accuracy, if careful attention is paid to mesh topology in the tip region. However, unsteady tools are necessary to accurately capture radial profiles of blockage and total pressure. The Delayed-Detached Eddy Simulation model was also used to run this geometry, but did not resolve any additional features not captured by the unsteady RANS simulation near stall.

References

1.
Van Zante
,
D. E.
,
Strazizar
,
A. J.
,
Wood
,
J. R.
,
Hathaway
,
M. D.
, and
Okiishi
,
T. H.
,
2000
, “
Recommendations for Achieving Accurate Numerical Simulation of Tip Clearance Flows in Transonic Compressor Rotors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
122
(
4
), pp.
733
742
. 10.1115/1.1314609
2.
Goto
,
T.
,
Oshio
,
T.
,
Tani
,
N.
,
Aotsuka
,
M.
,
Pallot
,
G.
, and
Kato
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Effect of Turbulence Model on the Prediction of Performance and Span-Wise Mixing in High-Speed Highly-Loaded Multi-Stage Axial-Flow Compressor
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
Paper No. GT2019-91141
.
3.
Moreno
,
J.
,
Dodds
,
J.
,
Vahdati
,
M.
, and
Stapelfeldt
,
S.
,
2019
, “
Deficiencies in Turbulence Modelling for the Prediction of the Stability Boundary in Highly Loaded Compressors
,”
ASME Turbo Expo 2019: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
,
Phoenix, AZ
,
Paper No. GT2019-91227
.
4.
Koff
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Tip Clearance Effects on Multistage Axial Compressor Performance and Flow Structure for Small Core Application
,”
Ph.D. thesis
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
.
5.
Sakulkaew
,
S.
,
Tan
,
C. S.
,
Donahoo
,
E.
,
Cornelius
,
C.
, and
Montgomery
,
M.
,
2013
, “
Compressor Efficiency Variation With Rotor Tip Gap From Vanishing to Large Clearance
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
135
(
3
), p.
031030
. 10.1115/1.4007547
6.
Hah
,
C.
,
2017
, “
Effects of Double Leakage Tip Clearance Flow on the Performance of a Compressor Stage With a Large Rotor Tip Gap
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
6
), p.
061006
. 10.1115/1.4035521
7.
Wellborn
,
S.
,
Okiishi
,
T. H.
, and
Strazisar
,
A. J.
,
1996
,
Effects of Shrouded Stator Cavity Flows on Multistage Axial Compressor Aerodynamic Performance
,
NASA CR 198536
.
8.
Culley
,
E. C.
,
Bright
,
M. M.
,
Prahst
,
P. S.
, and
Strazisar
,
A. J.
,
2004
, “
Active Flow Separation Control of a Stator Vane Using Surface Injection in a Multistage Compressor Experiment
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
126
(
1
), pp.
24
34
. 10.1115/1.1643912
9.
Wasserbauer
,
C. A.
,
Weaver
,
H. F.
, and
Senyitko
,
R. G.
,
1995
, “
NASA Low-Speed Axial Compressor for Fundamental Research
,”
NASA Technical Memorandum 4635
.
10.
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
Halstead
,
D. E.
, and
Beacher
,
B. F.
,
1999
, “
Improving Compressor and Turbine Performance Through Cost-Effective Low-Speed Testing
,”
International Symposium of Air Breathing Engines
,
Florence, Italy
,
Sept. 5–10
,
ISABE Paper 99-7073
.
11.
Shabbir
,
A.
, and
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
,
2005
, “
Flow Mechanism for Stall Margin Improvement Due to Circumferential Casing Grooves on Axial Compressors
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
127
(
4
), pp.
708
717
. 10.1115/1.2008970
You do not currently have access to this content.