The Durham Linear Cascade has been redesigned with the nonaxisymmetric profiled end wall described in the first part of this paper, with the aim of reducing the effects of secondary flow. The design intent was to reduce the passage vortex strength and to produce a more uniform exit flow angle profile in the radial direction with less overturning at the wall. The new end wall has been tested in the linear cascade and a comprehensive set of measurements taken. These include traverses of the flow field at a number of axial planes and surface static pressure distributions on the end wall. Detailed comparisons have been made with the CFD design predictions, and also for the results with a planar end wall. In this way an improved understanding of the effects of end wall profiling has been obtained. The experimental results generally agree with the design predictions, showing a reduction in the strength of the secondary flow at the exit and a more uniform flow angle profile. In a turbine stage these effects would be expected to improve the performance of any downstream blade row. There is also a reduction in the overall loss, which was not given by the CFD design predictions. Areas where there are discrepancies between the CFD calculations and measurement are likely to be due to the turbulence model used. Conclusions for how the three-dimensional linear design system should be used to define end wall geometries for improved turbine performance are presented. [S0889-504X(00)01002-3]

1.
Sieverding
,
C. H.
,
1985
, “
Recent Progress in the Understanding of Basic Aspects of Secondary Flows in Turbine Blade Passages
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
107
, pp.
248
252
.
2.
Rose, M. G., 1994, “Non-axisymmetric Endwall Profiling in the HP NGVs of an Axial Flow Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-249.
3.
Hartland, J. C., Gregory-Smith, D. G., and Rose, M. G., 1998, “Non-axisymmetric End Wall Profiling in a Turbine Rotor Blade,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-525.
4.
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
, and
Cleak
,
J. G. E.
,
1992
, “
Secondary Flow Measurements in a Turbine Cascade With High Inlet Turbulence
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
173
183
.
5.
Moore, H., and Gregory-Smith, D. G., 1995, “Turbulence and Transition in Secondary Flows in a Turbine Cascade,” AGARD-CP571, PEP Loss Mechanisms and Unsteady Flows in Turbomachines, Paper No. 8.
6.
Moore, H., and Gregory-Smith, D. G., 1996, “Transition Effects on Secondary Flows in a Turbine Cascade,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-100.
7.
Hartland, J. C., 1999, Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham, to be submitted.
8.
Gregory-Smith, D. G., and Graves, C. P., 1983, “Secondary Flows and Losses in a Turbine Cascade,” AGARD-CP351, Paper No. 17.
9.
Gregory-Smith, D. G., 1995, “Calculations of the Secondary Flow in a Turbine Cascade,” Computational Fluid Dynamics in Aeropropulsion, ASME AD-49, p. 77.
10.
Cleak
,
J. G. E.
, and
Gregory-Smith
,
D. G.
,
1992
, “
Turbulence Modeling for Secondary Flow Prediction in a Turbine Cascade
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
114
, pp.
590
598
.
You do not currently have access to this content.