Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of a two-layered porous journal bearing More about this image found in Schematic diagram of a two-layered porous journal bearing

Fig. 2 Discretized pressure grid More about this image found in Discretized pressure grid

Fig. 3 Flowchart for deterministic analysis based on FDM and stochastic analysis based on SVM-assisted machine learning More about this image found in Flowchart for deterministic analysis based on FDM and stochastic analysis b...

Fig. 4 The variation in responses ( W ¯ , Q ¯ z , a n d f ( R / C ) ) as a function of ( a ) slip coefficient ( α ), ( b ) bearing feeding parameter ( β ), ( c ) permeability factor ( σ ), ( d ) eccentricity ratio ( ɛ o ), and ( e ) Reynolds number (Re... More about this image found in The variation in responses ( W ¯ , Q ¯ z , a n ...

Fig. 5 Variation in attitude angle ( ϕ o ) as a function of ( a ) slip coefficient ( α ), ( b ) bearing feeding parameter ( β ), ( c ) permeability factor ( σ ), ( d ) eccentricity ratio ( ɛ o ), and ( e ) Reynold’s number (Re) More about this image found in Variation in attitude angle ( ϕ o ) as a function of ( a ) slip coeffici...

Fig. 6 Scatter plots to validate the SVM model for ( a ) load-bearing capacity ( W ¯ ) , ( b ) attitude angle ( ϕ o ), ( c ) side leakage ( Q ¯ z ) , and ( d ) frictional parameter ( f ( R / C )) for 1024 samples More about this image found in Scatter plots to validate the SVM model for ( a ) load-bearing capacity ...

Fig. 7 The probabilistic distribution of percentage error in SVM-predicted responses ( N = sample size) More about this image found in The probabilistic distribution of percentage error in SVM-predicted respons...

Fig. 8 The comparison of probabilistic descriptions derived from MCS (FDM-based simulation) and SVM-based predictions for ( a ) load-bearing capacity ( W ¯ ) , ( b ) attitude angle ( ϕ o ), ( c ) side leakage ( Q ¯ z ) , and ( d ) frictional parameter ( f ( R / C )) More about this image found in The comparison of probabilistic descriptions derived from MCS (FDM-based si...

Fig. 9 The influence of individual and combined parametric variations on the ( a ) load-bearing capacity ( W ¯ ) , ( b ) attitude angle ( ϕ o ), ( c ) side leakage ( Q ¯ z ) , and ( d ) frictional parameter ( f ( R/C )). The inset provided in each subfigure depicts ... More about this image found in The influence of individual and combined parametric variations on the ( a )...

Fig. 10 The probabilistic comparison of variation in bearing feeding parameter ( β ) and eccentricity ratio ( ɛ o ) for ( a )–( c ) load-bearing capacity ( W ¯ ) and ( d )–( f ) attitude angle ( ϕ o ) More about this image found in The probabilistic comparison of variation in bearing feeding parameter ( β ...

Fig. 11 The probabilistic comparison of variation in bearing feeding parameter ( β ) and eccentricity ratio ( ɛ o ) for ( a )–( c ) side leakage ( Q z ¯ ) . The probabilistic comparison of variation in Reynold’s number (Re) and eccentricity ratio ( ɛ o ) for ( d )–( f ) frictional p... More about this image found in The probabilistic comparison of variation in bearing feeding parameter ( β ...

Fig. 12 The influence of combined parametric variations on the nondimensional stochastic pressure distribution of the journal bearing with two-layered porous bush, considering perturbation percentages as ( a ) ω ¯ = 2.5 % and 0 % , ( b ) ω ¯ = 5 % and 0 %... More about this image found in The influence of combined parametric variations on the nondimensional stoch...

Fig. 1 Experimental setup of microwave casting process More about this image found in Experimental setup of microwave casting process

Fig. 2 Process layout of microwave casting process (melting and final casting product) [ 27 ] More about this image found in Process layout of microwave casting process (melting and final casting prod...