Flexible energy carriers are a crucial element of our energy portfolio. In a future in which a significant fraction of our energy comes from renewable sources, renewably produced fuels will be vital. The zinc/zinc-oxide thermochemical redox cycle is one approach for producing hydrogen using solar energy. This paper explores the level of carbon taxation necessary to make the cycle competitive with hydrogen production via methane reforming. In addition, the time frame for economic viability is assessed through the use of experience curves under minimal input, midrange, and aggressive incentive policy scenarios. Prior work projects that hydrogen produced by the zinc/zinc-oxide cycle will cost between $5.02/kg and $14.75/kg, compared with $2.40–3.60/kg for steam methane reforming. Overcoming this cost difference would require a carbon tax of ($119987)/tCO2, which is significantly higher than is likely to be implemented in most countries. For the technology to become cost competitive, incentive policies that lead to early implementation of solar hydrogen plants will be necessary to allow the experience effect to draw down the price. Under such policies, a learning curve analysis suggests that hydrogen produced via the Zn/ZnO cycle could become economically viable between 2032 and 2069, depending on how aggressively the policies encourage the emerging technology. Thus, the Zn/ZnO cycle has the potential to be economically viable by midcentury if incentive policies—such as direct financial support, purchase guarantees, low interest rate loans, and tax breaks—are used to support initial projects.

1.
Pacala
,
S.
, and
Socolow
,
R.
, 2004, “
Stabilization Wedges: Solving the Climate Problem for the Next 50 Years With Current Technologies
,”
Science
0036-8075,
305
, pp.
968
972
.
2.
IPCC
, 2007, “
Summary for Policymakers
,”
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
,
Cambrige University Press
,
New York
.
3.
Romm
,
J.
, 2004, “
The Hype About Hydrogen
,”
Issues Sci. Technol.
0748-5492, Spring 2004, pp.
74
81
.
4.
Sperling
,
D.
, and
Ogden
,
J.
, 2004, “
The Hope for Hydrogen
,”
Issues Sci. Technol.
0748-5492, Spring 2004, pp.
82
86
.
5.
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2002, “
Solar Hydrogen Production via a Two-Step Water-Splitting Thermochemical Cycle Based on Zn-ZnO Redox Reactions
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
27
, pp.
611
619
.
6.
Weidenkaff
,
A.
,
Steinfeld
,
A.
,
Wokaun
,
A.
,
Auer
,
P. O.
,
Eichler
,
B.
, and
Reller
,
A.
, 1999, “
Direct Solar Thermal Dissociation of Zinc Oxide: Condensation and Crystallisation of Zinc in the Presence of Oxygen
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
65
, pp.
59
69
.
7.
Keunecke
,
M.
,
Meier
,
A.
, and
Palumbo
,
R.
, 2004, “
Solar Thermal Decomposition of Zinc Oxide: An Initial Investigation of the Recombination Reaction in the Temperature Range 1100–1250 K
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
0009-2509,
59
, pp.
2695
2704
.
8.
Muller
,
R.
,
Haeberling
,
P.
, and
Palumbo
,
R. D.
, 2006, “
Further Advances Toward the Development of a Direct Heating Solar Thermal Chemical Reactor for the Thermal Dissociation of ZnO(s)
,”
Sol. Energy
0038-092X,
80
, pp.
500
511
.
9.
Gstoehl
,
D.
,
Brambilla
,
A.
,
Schunk
,
L. O.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2008, “
A Quenching Apparatus for the Gaseous Products of the Solar Thermal Dissociation of ZnO
,”
J. Mater. Sci.
0022-2461,
43
, pp.
4729
4736
.
10.
Weiss
,
R. J.
,
Ly
,
H. C.
,
Wegner
,
K.
,
Pratsinis
,
S. E.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2005, “
H2 Production by Zn Hydrolysis in a Hot-Wall Aerosol Reactor
,”
Particle Technology and Fluidization
,
51
, pp.
1966
1970
.
11.
Wegner
,
K.
,
Ly
,
H. C.
,
Weiss
,
R. J.
,
Pratsinis
,
S. E.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2006, “
In Situ Formation and Hydrolysis of Zn Nanoparticles for H2 Production by the 2-Step ZnO/Zn Water-Splitting Thermochemical Cycle
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
31
, pp.
55
61
.
12.
Ernst
,
F. O.
,
Tricoli
,
A.
,
Pratsinis
,
S. E.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2006, “
Co-Synthesis of H2 and ZnO by In-Situ Zn Aerosol Formation and Hydrolysis
,”
Environmental Energy and Policy
,
52
, pp.
3297
3303
.
13.
Abu Hamed
,
T.
,
Davidson
,
J. H.
, and
Stolzenburg
,
M.
, 2008, “
Hydrolysis of Evaporated Zn in a Hot Wall Flow Reactor
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
130
, p.
041010
.
14.
Abu Hamed
,
T.
,
Davidson
,
J. H.
, and
Haltiwanger
,
J. F.
, 2007, “
Hydrogen Production via Hydrolysis of Zinc Nanoparticles
,”
Proceedings of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers Conference
.
15.
Funke
,
H. H.
,
Diaz
,
H.
,
Liang
,
X.
,
Carney
,
C. S.
,
Weimer
,
A. W.
, and
Li
,
P.
, 2008, “
Hydrogen Generation by Hydrolysis of Zinc Powder Aerosol
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
33
, pp.
1127
1134
.
16.
Abu Hamed
,
T.
,
Venstrom
,
L.
,
Alshare
,
A.
,
Brulhart
,
M.
, and
Davidson
,
J. H.
, 2009, “
Study of a Quench Device for Synthesis and Hydrolysis of Zn Nanoparticles: Modeling and Experiments
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
131
, p.
031018
.
17.
Melchior
,
T.
,
Piatkowski
,
N.
, and
Steinfeld
,
A.
, 2009, “
H2 Production by Steam-Quenching of Zn Vapor in a Hot-Wall Aerosol Flow Reactor
,”
Chem. Eng. Sci.
0009-2509,
64
, pp.
1095
1101
.
18.
19.
Rai
,
V.
,
Victor
,
D. G.
, and
Thurber
,
M. C.
, 2009, “
Carbon Capture and Storage at Scale: Lessons From the Growth of Analogous Energy Technologies
,” Stanford University Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Technical Report (Working Paper No. 81).
20.
United States Energy Information Administration
, http://www.eia.doe.gov/http://www.eia.doe.gov/
21.
Darmstadter
,
J.
, 2004, “
Stimulating Renewable Energy
,”
New Approaches for Energy and the Environment: Policy Advice for the President
,
RFF
,
Washington, DC
, pp.
28
33
.
22.
Charvin
,
P.
,
Abanades
,
S.
,
Lemort
,
F.
, and
Flamant
,
G.
, 2008, “
Analysis of Solar Chemical Processes for Hydrogen Production From Water Splitting Thermochemical Cycles
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
49
, pp.
1547
1556
.
23.
Padro
,
C.
, and
Putsche
,
V.
, 1999, “
Survey of the Economics of Hydrogen Technologies
,” NREL Technical Report No. TP-570-27079.
24.
Doty
,
F. D.
, 2004, “
A Realistic Look at Hydrogen Price Projections
,” Doty Scientific, Inc. Technical Report.
25.
Spath
,
P. L.
, and
Mann
,
M. K.
, 2001, “
Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report No. TP-570-27637.
26.
IEA
, 2000, “
Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy
,” International Energy Agency and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27.
Schoots
,
K.
,
Ferioli
,
F.
,
Kramer
,
G.
, and
van der Zwaan
,
B.
, 2008, “
Learning Curves for Hydrogen Production Technology: An Assessment of Observed Cost Reductions
,”
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy
0360-3199,
33
, pp.
2630
2645
.
28.
Rubin
,
E. S.
,
Yeh
,
S.
,
Antes
,
M.
,
Berkenpas
,
M.
, and
Davison
,
J.
, 2007, “
Use of Experience Curves to Estimate the Future Cost of Power Plants With CO2 Capture
,”
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
,
1
, pp.
188
197
.
29.
Neij
,
L.
, 2008, “
Cost Development of Future Technologies for Power Generation—A Study Based on Experience Curves and Complementary Bottom-Up Assessments
,”
Energy Policy
0301-4215,
36
, pp.
2200
2211
.
30.
Romero
,
M.
,
Buck
,
R.
, and
Pacheco
,
J. E.
, 2002, “
An Update on Solar Central Receiver Systems, Projects, and Technologies
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
124
, pp.
98
108
.
You do not currently have access to this content.