This paper presents a method based on the imposition of velocity discontinuities to model flow perturbation due to the existence of vortical structures. The proposed method uses actuator-disk and lifting line concepts in order to provide a framework of analysis that respects conservation laws for momentum, energy, and vorticity, which is not always the case for engineering methods used in the wind industry. The flow field is described by the Euler equations. In the proposed mathematical model, the attitude toward flow determination is entirely linked to the vorticity structure of the flow, which is modeled by velocity discontinuities. The numerical method has been applied to four wind turbines: NREL phases II, IV, and VI rotors, as well as to the Tjaereborg rotor, and has shown satisfactory predictions compared to measurements up to peak power. Comparisons have also been undertaken with the results of a previous method, developed by the same authors, where the velocity field is not allowed to be discontinuous and the actuator disk is analyzed as a source of external forces only. In the stall regime of the turbine, the relative differences in power output between the two methods have been evaluated at 5% on the average.

Keywords:
wind power, Gaussian distribution, forecasting theory, error analysis, Actuator-Disk, Blade-Element Theory, Wind Turbine Performance Predictions
Topics:
Actuators, Blades, Disks, Flow (Dynamics), Rotors, Wind turbines
1.
van Kuik, G. A. M., 2004, “The Generation of Vorticity by Actuator Disc Force, With an Exact Solution of Wu’s Equation,” Proceeding of the Special Topic Conference The Science of Making Torque from Wind, Delft, pp. 89–97.
2.
Conway
,
J. T.
,
1998
, “
Exact Actuator Disk Solutions for Nonuniform Heavy Loading and Slipstream Contraction
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
365
, pp.
235
–
267
.
3.
Mikkelsen, R., 2003, “Actuator Disc Methods Applied to Wind Turbines,” Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark.
4.
Rajagopalan
,
R. G.
, and
Fanucci
,
J. B.
,
1985
, “
Finite Difference Model for the Vertical Axis Wind Turbines
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
1
, pp.
432
–
436
.
5.
Masson
,
C.
,
Ammara
,
I.
, and
Paraschivoiu
,
I.
,
1997
, “
An Aerodynamic Method for the Analysis of Isolated Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbines
,”
Int. J. Rotating Mach.
,
3
, pp.
21
–
32
.
6.
Madsen, H. A., 1982, “The Actuator Cylinder: A Flow Model for Vertical Axis Wind Turbines,” Aalborg University Center, Institute of Industrial Construction and Energy Technology, Aalborg Denmark.
7.
Snel, H., and Schepers, J. G., 1994, “Joint Investigation of Dynamic Inflow Effects and Implementation of an Engineering Method,” Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, ECN-C-94-107.
8.
Dumitrescu, H., and Cardos, V., 1998, “Response of Wind Turbine Blades to Sharp Pitch Increase,” Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, Vol. C, pp. 1769–1776.
9.
Sorensen
,
J. N.
, and
Myken
,
A.
,
1992
, “
Unsteady Actuator Disk Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
39
, pp.
139
–
149
.
10.
Leclerc, C., and Masson, C., 2004, “Toward Blade-Tip Vortex Simulation With an Actuator-Lifting Surface Model,” A Collection of the 2004 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno NV, pp. 300–308.
11.
Prandtl, L., 1919, “Annex of Betz’s Article Entitled Schraubenpropeller mit Geringstem Energieverlust,” Kgl. Ges. d, Wiss. Nachrichten Math.-phys. Klasse.
12.
Leishman, J. G., 2002, “Challenges in Modeling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” A Collection of the 2002 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno NV, pp. 141–167.
13.
Masson
,
C.
,
Saabas
,
H. J.
, and
Baliga
,
B. R.
,
1994
, “
Co-Located Equal-Order Control-Volume Finite-Element Method for Two-Dimensional Axisymmetric Incompressible Flow
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
18
, pp.
1
–
26
.
14.
Hand
,
M. M.
,
Simms
,
D. A.
,
Fingersh
,
L. J.
,
Jager
,
D. W.
,
Cotrell
,
J. R.
,
Schreck
,
S.
, and
Larwood
,
S. M.
,
2001
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment Phase VI: Wind Tunnel Test Configurations and Available Data Campaigns
,”
NREL Report
TP-500-29955, NREL, Golden, CO.
15.
Sorensen
,
J. N.
, and
Kock
,
C. W.
,
1995
, “
A Model for Unsteady Rotor Aerodynamics
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
,
58
, pp.
259
–
275
.
16.
Butterfield
,
C. P.
,
Musial
,
W. P.
,
Scott
,
G. N.
, and
Simms
,
D. A.
,
2000
, “
NREL Combined Experiment Final Report Phase II,” NREL/TP-442-4802, NREL, Golden, CO.
17.
Chaviaropoulos
,
P. K.
, and
Hansen
,
M. O. L.
,
2000
, “
Investigating Three-Dimensional and Rotational Effects on Wind Turbine Blades by Means of a Quasi-3D Navier-Stokes Solver
,”
J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
330
–
336
.
18.
Snel, H., Houwink, R., Bosschers, J., Piers, W. J., and Bruining, A., 1993, “Sectional Predictions of 3D Effects for Stalled Flows on Rotating Blades and Comparisons With Measurements,” Proceedings of the 1993 EWEC Conference, pp. 395–399.
19.
Du, Z., and Selig, M. S., 1998, “A 3-D Stall-Delay Model for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Performance Prediction,” A Collection of the 1998 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno NV, pp. 9–19.
20.
Laino, D. J., and Hansen, A. C., 2004, “Current Efforts Toward Improved Aerodynamic Modeling Using the Aerodyn Subroutines,” A Collection of the 2004 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno NV, pp. 329–338.
21.
Eggers, A. J., and Chaney, K., 2004, “Approximate Modeling of Deep Stall Effects on Yawed Rotor Loads,” A Collection of the 2004 ASME Wind Energy Symposium, Reno NV, pp. 271–280.
22.
Gerber, B., Duque, E., Tangler, J., and Kocurek, D., 2004, “Peak and Post-Peak Power Predictions for Constant Speed Rotor Operation,” Proceeding of the Special Topic Conference The Science of Making Torque from Wind, Delft, pp. 98–107.
23.
Masson, and Leclerc, 1998.
Copyright © 2005
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.