The Long-term Inflow and Structural Test (LIST) program is collecting long-term, continuous inflow and structural response data to characterize the spectrum of loads on wind turbines. A heavily instrumented Micon 65/13M turbine with Phoenix 8m blades is being used as the test turbine for the first measurement campaign of this program. This turbine is located in Bushland, TX, a test site that exposes the turbine to a wind regime representative of a Great Plains commercial site. The turbine and inflow are being characterized with 60 measurements: 34 to characterize the inflow, 19 to characterize structural response, and seven to characterize the time-varying state of the turbine. In this paper, an analysis of the structural and inflow data is presented. Particular attention is paid to the determination of the various structural loads on the turbine, long-term fatigue spectra and the correlation of various inflow descriptors with fatigue loads. For the latter analysis, the inflow is described by various parameters, including the mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis of the hub-height horizontal wind speed, turbulence intensity, turbulence length scales, Reynolds stresses, local friction velocity, Obukhov length, and the gradient Richardson number. The fatigue load spectrum corresponding to these parameters is characterized as an equivalent fatigue load. A regression analysis is then used to determine which parameters are correlated to the fatigue loads. The results illustrate that the vertical component of the inflow is the most important of the secondary inflow parameters with respect to fatigue loads. Long-term fatigue spectra illustrate that extrapolation of relatively short-term data to longer times is consistent for the data reported here.

1.
Sutherland, H. J., Jones, P. L., and Neal, B., 2001, “The Long-Term Inflow and Structural Test Program,” 2001 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, p. 162.
2.
Sutherland, H. J., 2001, “Preliminary Analysis of the Structural and Inflow Data From the LIST Turbine,” 2001 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, p. 173.
3.
Sutherland, H. J., 2002, “Inflow and the Fatigue of the LIST Wind Turbine,” 2002 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, p. 427.
4.
Madsen, P. H., Pierce, K., and Buhl, M. 1999, “Predicting Ultimate Loads for Wind Turbine Design,” 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symp., p. 355.
5.
Sutherland, H. J., and Butterfield, C. P., 1994 “A Summary of the Workshop on Fatigue Life Methodologies for Wind Turbines,” Proc. of Windpower ’94, AWEA, Washington, DC, May, p. 279.
6.
Glinou G. and Fragoulis, A. (eds.), 1996, Mounturb Final Report, 3 vols., JOU2-CT93-0378.
7.
Jones, P. L., Sutherland, H. J., and Neal, B. A., 2001, “LIST/BMI Turbines, Instrumentation and Infrastructure,” SAND2001-1642, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM.
8.
Tangler, J., 1999, private communication.
9.
O’Gorman, C. C., and Simmermacher, T. W., 1999, “SERI Wind Turbine Blade (B3) Mass Properties Testing, Bushland, TX,” Internal SNL Memo, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, July 16.
10.
Simmermacher, T., O’Gorman, C., Martin, W., and Lopez, F., 1999, “Modal Test of SERI-Blade B1,” Internal SNL Memo, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, July 22.
11.
Simmermacher, T., and Carne, T., 1999, “Tower Modal Survey,” Internal SNL Memo, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, Dec 20.
12.
Tangler, J., Smith, B., Kelley, N., and Jager, D., 1991, “Measured and Predicted Rotor Performance for the SERI Advanced Wind Turbine Blades,” Proc. of Windpower ’91, SERI/TP-253-4673, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO, p. 104.
13.
Tangler, J., Smith, B., Jager, D., and Olsen, T., 1990, “Atmospheric Performance of the SERI Thin-Airfoil Family,” SERI/TP-257-3939, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO.
14.
Tangler, J., Smith, B., Jager, D., McKenna, E., and Allread, J., 1989, “Atmospheric Performance Testing of the Special-Purpose SERI Thin Airfoil Family: Preliminary Results,” Proc. of Windpower ’89, SERI/TP-257-3628, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO, p. 115.
15.
Berg, D., and Zayas, J., 2001, “Accurate Time-Linked Data Acquisition System Field Deployment and Operational Experience,” 2001 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, p. 153.
16.
Rohatgi, J. S., and Nelson, V., 1994, Wind Characteristics, An Analysis for the Generation of Wind Power, Alternative Energy Institute, Canyon, TX.
17.
Fragoulis, A. N., 1997, “The Complex Terrain Wind Environment and Its Effects on the Power Output and Loading of Wind Turbines,” 1997 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, p. 33.
18.
Kelley, N. D., and McKenna, H. E., 1996, “The Evaluation of a Turbulent Loads Characterization System,” 1996 ASME Wind Energy Symp., ASME, pp. 69–77.
19.
Kelley, N. D., Wright, A. D., Buhl Jr., M. L., and Tangler, J. L., 1997, “Long-Term Simulation of Turbulence-Induced Loads Using the SNL WINd-3D, FAST, YawDyn, and ADAMS Numerical Codes,” 1997 ASME Wind Energy Symp., ASME, p. 74.
20.
Buhl Jr., M. L., 2001, CRUNCH User’s Guide, Ver. 2.61, NREL/NWTC, Golden, CO.
21.
Sutherland, H. J., 1999, “On the Fatigue Analysis of Wind Turbines,” SAND99-0089, Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM.
22.
“Wind Turbine Generator Systems, Part 13: Measurement of Mechanical Loads,” Draft Tech. Report, 1998, IEC 61400-13, prepared by IEC-TC88, Working Group 11.
23.
Musial, W., Clark, M., Egging, N., and Zuteck, M., 1997, “A Comparison of Strength and Load-Based Methods for Testing Wind Turbine Blades,” 1997 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, W. Musial and D. E. Berg (eds.) p. 228.
24.
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific Computing, Second Edition, Chap. 15.4, Cambridge Univ. Press.
25.
Madsen, P. H., Pierce, K., and Buhl, M, 1999, “Predicting Ultimate Loads for Wind Turbine Design,” 1999 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, T. Ashwill (ed.), p. 355.
26.
Laino, D. J., and Pierce, K. G., 2000, “Evaluating Statistical Loads Extrapolation Methods,” 2000 ASME Wind Energy Symp., AIAA/ASME, P. Migliore (ed.), p. 424.
You do not currently have access to this content.