From luminous efficacy models, illuminance can be estimated if irradiance is known or can be estimated. In the present paper, Muneer’s models for the luminous efficacy of global and diffuse radiation, useful for illumination engineers, are statistically assessed using data obtained at Madrid during a seven-year period. Several other models inspired on the simple approach proposed by Muneer are developed and statistically assessed. Some of those model the luminous efficacy of global or diffuse solar radiation, while others directly model the global or the diffuse illuminance. It is shown that for diffuse illuminance estimation the ratio of diffuse to extraterrestrial irradiance is to be preferred as independent variable to the ratio of global to extraterrestrial irradiance proposed by Muneer. Some models that estimate global illuminance from global irradiance and solar elevation, or diffuse illuminance from diffuse irradiance and solar elevation, perform practically on a par with the corresponding luminous efficacy models. It is also concluded that the striking difference between global luminous efficacy between the United Kingdom and Japan observed by Muneer is not due to a latitude effect.

1.
Oteiza
,
P.
, and
Soler
,
A.
,
1997
, “
Experimental analysis of a simple graphic daylight calculation method based on the CIE standard overcast sky
,”
Build. Env.
,
32
, pp.
363
366
.
2.
Littlefair, P. J., 1984, “Daylight availability for lighting controls,” Proc. CIBSE Nat. Lighting Conf., London, pp. 215–233.
3.
Ubbelholde, M. S., and Human, C., 1998, “A comparative evaluation of delighting software, Superlite, Lumen Micro, Lightscape and Radiance,” Proc. Delighting 98, Canadian Ministry of Supply and Finances, pp. 97–104.
4.
Soler
,
A.
, and
Oteiza
,
P.
,
1997
, “Light shelf performance in Madrid, Spain,”
Build. Env.,
32
, pp.
363
366
.
5.
Littlefair
,
P. J.
,
1988
, “
Measurement of the luminous efficacy of daylight
,”
Light. Res. Technol.
,
20
, pp.
177
188
.
6.
Perez
,
R.
,
Ineichen
,
P.
,
Seals
,
R.
,
Michalsky
,
J.
, and
Stewart
,
R.
,
1990
, “
Modeling daylight availability irradiance components from direct and global irradiance
,”
Sol. Energy
,
44
, pp.
271
298
.
7.
Ullah
,
M. B.
,
1996
, “
International Daylight Measurement Program-Singapore data II: Luminous efficacy for the tropics
,”
Light. Res. Technol.
,
28
, pp.
75
82
.
8.
Aydinli, S., and Krochman, J., 1983, “Data on daylight and solar radiation,” Draft for CIE T.C. 4.2. Geneve, Switzerland.
9.
Olseth
,
J. A.
, and
Skartveit
,
A.
,
1989
, “
Observed and modeled hourly luminous efficacy under arbitrary cloudiness
,”
Sol. Energy
,
42
, pp.
221
233
.
10.
Chong
,
T.
,
1992
, “
A study of luminous efficacy of daylight in Hong Kong
,”
Energy Build.
,
19
, pp.
45
50
.
11.
Czeplak, G., 1994, “Investigation of impact of cloud amount and height on luminous efficacy,” IEA Task 17’s Final Technical Report on “Broad-band visible radiation data acquisition and analysis,” Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, Albany, New York, 3, pp. 14-1 to 14.9.
12.
Robledo
,
L.
, and
Soler
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Luminous efficacy of direct solar radiation for clear skies
,”
Energy (Oxford)
,
25
, pp.
689
701
.
13.
Robledo
,
L.
, and
Soler
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Luminous efficacy of global solar radiation for clear skies
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
41
, pp.
1769
1779
.
14.
Robledo, L., and Soler, A., 2001, “Luminous efficacy of direct solar radiation for all sky types,” Energy (Oxford), in press.
15.
Robledo
,
L.
, and
Soler
,
A.
,
2001
, “
On the luminous efficacy of diffuse solar radiation
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
42
, pp.
1181
1190
.
16.
Soler
,
A.
, and
Robledo
,
L.
,
2000
, “
Global luminous efficacy on vertical surfaces for all sky types
,”
Renewable Energy
,
19
, pp.
61
64
.
17.
Muneer
,
T.
,
1995
, “
Solar irradiance and illuminance models for Japan II: Luminous efficacy
,”
Light. Res. Technol.
,
27
, pp.
223
230
.
18.
Muneer
,
T.
, and
Kinghorn
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Luminous efficacy of solar irradiance: Improved models
,”
Light. Res. Technol.
,
29
, pp.
185
191
.
19.
Littlefair, P. J., 1995, “Availability of daylight in Europe and design of a delighting atlas.” Contract N∘ JOU2 CT92-0144, Commission of European Communities, Brussels.
20.
Dumortier, D., 1995, “Measure, Analyze et Mode´lisation du gisement lumineux. Application a` l’ e´valuation des performances de l’ eclairage naturel desbatiments,” Ph.D. Thesis, Universite´ de Savoie, France.
21.
Kittler, R., Darula, S., and Perez, R., 1998, “A set of standard skies characterizing daylight conditions for computer and energy conscious design,” Final Report American-Slovak Project US-SK 92 052, Institute of Construction and Architecture, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava 84220, Slovakia.
22.
Soler
,
A.
, and
Gopinathan
,
K. K.
,
2000
, “
A study of zenith luminance on Madrid cloudless skies
,”
Sol. Energy
,
69
, pp.
403
411
.
23.
Soler
,
A.
,
Gopinathan
,
K. K.
, and
Claros
,
S. T.
,
2001
, “
A study of zenith luminance on Madrid overcast skies
,”
Renewable Energy
,
23
, pp.
49
55
.
24.
Soler, A., and Gopinathan, K. K., 2001, “A study of the luminous distribution on Madrid overcast skies and the relation to the CIE model,” Build. Env., submitted.
You do not currently have access to this content.