A series of pedestrian sideswipe impacts were computationally reconstructed; a fast-walking pedestrian was collided laterally with the side of a moving vehicle at 25 km/h or 40 km/h, which resulted in rotating the pedestrian's body axially. Potential severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) was assessed using linear and rotational acceleration pulses applied to the head and by measuring intracranial brain tissue deformation. We found that TBI risk due to secondary head strike with the ground can be much greater than that due to primary head strike with the vehicle. Further, an “effective” head mass, meff, was computed based upon the impulse and vertical velocity change involved in the secondary head strike, which mostly exceeded the mass of the adult head-form impactor (4.5 kg) commonly used for a current regulatory impact test for pedestrian safety assessment. Our results demonstrated that a sport utility vehicle (SUV) is more aggressive than a sedan due to the differences in frontal shape. Additionally, it was highlighted that a striking vehicle velocity should be lower than 25 km/h at the moment of impact to exclude the potential risk of sustaining TBI, which would be mitigated by actively controlling meff, because meff is closely associated with a rotational acceleration pulse applied to the head involved in the final event of ground contact.
Comparative Analysis on Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Due to Primary and Secondary Impacts in a Pedestrian Sideswipe Accident
Manuscript received February 19, 2017; final manuscript received February 20, 2018; published online April 30, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Chimba Mkandawire.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Tamura, A., Hasegawa, J., and Koide, T. (April 30, 2018). "Comparative Analysis on Traumatic Brain Injury Risk Due to Primary and Secondary Impacts in a Pedestrian Sideswipe Accident." ASME. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. December 2018; 4(4): 041004. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039464
Download citation file: