Abstract

Fatigue test specimens were prepared and tested with an API 5 L X70 spiral welded pipe steel and girth weld. For a few selected specimens, two unloading compliance techniques (elastic compliance and back-face strain compliance) were applied simultaneously to a single specimen for direct comparisons of in situ crack size estimation. This paper also includes fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) data of other pipe steels and welds available in the literature. It was observed that most FCGR curves of pipeline steels (X65–X100) remained within the BS 7910 mean and upper bound design curves in the Paris region. It was noted that the FCGR of austenitic stainless pipe steel and girth weld obtained from Arora et al. (2014), “Fatigue Crack Growth Studies on Narrow Gap Pipe Welds of Austenitic Stainless Steel Material,” Procedia Eng., 86, pp. 203–208) showed a very superior fatigue property.

References

1.
BS
,
2019
, “
Guide to Methods for Assessing the Acceptability of Flaws in Metallic Structures
,” BS, London, UK, Standard No. BS 7910.
2.
Wu
,
X. J.
,
Koul
,
A. K.
, and
Krausz
,
A. S.
,
1993
, “
A Transgranular Fatigue Crack Growth Model Based on Restricted Slip Reversibility
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
24
(
6
), pp.
1373
1380
.10.1007/BF02668205
3.
ASTM
,
2020
, “
Standard Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness KIC of Metallic Materials
,” ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM E399
.https://www.astm.org/e0399-17.html
4.
ASTM
,
2016
, “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates
,” ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM E647
.https://www.astm.org/e0647-23a.html
5.
ASTM
,
2020
, “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
,” ASTM Int., West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No.
ASTM E1820
.https://www.astm.org/e1820-18.html
6.
Been
,
J.
,
Eadie
,
R.
, and
Sutherby
,
R.
,
2006
, “
Prediction of Environmentally Assisted Cracking on Gas and Liquid Pipelines
,”
ASME
Paper No. IPC2006-10345.10.1115/IPC2006-10345
7.
Treinen
,
J. M.
,
McColskey
,
J. D.
,
Darcis
,
P. P.
,
Smith
,
R.
, and
Merritt
,
J.
,
2008
, “
Effects of Specimen Geometry on Fatigue-Crack Growth Rates in Pipeline Steels
,”
ASME
Paper No. IPC2008-64360.10.1115/IPC2008-64360
8.
Arora
,
P.
,
Kumar
,
S.
,
Singh
,
R. K.
,
Singh
,
P. K.
,
Bhasin
,
V.
, and
Vaze
,
K. K.
,
2014
, “
Fatigue Crack Growth Studies on Narrow Gap Pipe Welds of Austenitic Stainless Steel Material
,”
Procedia Eng.
,
86
, pp.
203
208
.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.029
9.
Santos
,
E. A.
,
Hippert
,
E.
,
Ruggieri
,
C.
, and
Filho
,
W. W. B.
,
2015
, “
Effect of Specimen Geometry on the Fatigue Crack Growth Characterization of a Clad Pipe Girth Weld
,”
Rio Pipeline Conference and Exposition
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, Sept. 29–Oct. 3, pp.
1
10
.https://www.nist.gov/publications/effects-specimen-geometry-fatigue-crack-growth-rates-pipeline-steels
10.
Newman
,
J. C.
,
Yamada
,
Y.
, and
James
,
M. A.
,
2011
, “
Back-Face Strain Compliance Relation for Compact Specimens for Wide Range in Crack Lengths
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
78
(
15
), pp.
2707
2711
.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.001
11.
Yoder
,
G. R.
,
Cooley
,
L. A.
, and
Crooker
,
T. W.
,
1981
, “
Procedures for Precision Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Using Crack-Opening Displacement Techniques
,”
ASTM STP
,
738
, pp.
85
102
.10.1520/STP33454S
You do not currently have access to this content.