Abstract

Compressor units used for long-distance transportation natural gas pipeline pressurization have high-pressure and high-risk characteristics. Hence, the scientific reliability assessment is important for high-pressure compressor units, to evaluate the reliability standard, find the performance deficiency, and provide references for operation and maintenance. The classical reliability assessment method is not suitable for the complex and high-reliability equipment, like high-pressure compressor units and pipelines. The reliability assessment of the high-reliability equipment is faced with the challenge of the multisource information. A reliability assessment method based on the multisource information fusion is proposed in this work. The fusion resources consist of design information, component test information, and trial operation information. The reliability of high-pressure compressor units can be assessed by fusing the characteristic parameters, from component-based assessment, function-based assessment, quality evaluation, and life model, by D–S evidence theory. A case study is conducted to verify the proposed reliability assessment method in a 20 MW-class high-pressure compressor. There are four information resources in the case, i.e., component test data, design information, operation data, and simulation data. The compressor reliability is assessed as 99.32%, validated by the statistical assessment result based on long-term shutdown reports. This application points out the existing weakness in the high-pressure compressor units and indicates the directions for improving the design, analysis, operation, and failure prevention technologies. It reveals that the reliability assessment based on multisource information can provide a guarantee for the operation and maintenance of high-pressure compressor units. Meanwhile, the proposed method has good expansibility, which may be used in more fields.

References

1.
Zio
,
E.
,
2009
, “
Reliability Engineering: Old Problems and New Challenges
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
94
(
2
), pp.
125
141
.10.1016/j.ress.2008.06.002
2.
Li
,
Y.
,
Sun
,
B.
,
Wang
,
Z.
, and
Ren
,
Y.
,
2017
, “
Ontology-Based Environmental Effectiveness Knowledge Application System for Optimal Reliability Design
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
17
(
1
), p.
011005
.10.1115/1.4034129
3.
Mourtzis
,
D.
,
Papatheodorou
,
A. M.
, and
Fotia
,
S.
,
2018
, “
Development of a Key Performance Indicator Assessment Methodology and Software Tool for Product-Service System Evaluation and Decision-Making Support
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
18
(
4
), p.
041005
.10.1115/1.4040340
4.
Nessim
,
M.
,
Zhou
,
W.
,
Zhou
,
J.
, and
Rothwell
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Target Reliability Levels for Design and Assessment of Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
131
(
6
), p.
061701
.10.1115/1.3110017
5.
Nessim
,
M.
,
Zhou
,
W.
,
Zhou
,
J.
, and
Rothwell
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Reliability Based Design and Assessment for Location-Specific Failure Threats With Application to Natural Gas Pipelines
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
131
(
4
), p.
041701
.10.1115/1.3110019
6.
Zhou
,
J.
,
Rothwell
,
B.
,
Nessim
,
M.
, and
Zhou
,
W.
,
2009
, “
Reliability-Based Design and Assessment Standards for Onshore Natural Gas Transmission Pipelines
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
131
(
3
), p.
031702
.10.1115/1.2902281
7.
Dong
,
Y.
, and
Zhao
,
Z.
,
2006
, “
Analytical Method of Fuzzy Reliability Based on Link Equation of Conventional Reliability Theory
,”
Chin. J. Mech. Eng.
,
42
(
01
), pp.
57
61
.10.3901/JME.2006.01.057
8.
Ellis
,
F. V.
,
2006
, “
Metallurgical Failure Analysis of a Rotating Blade in the Compressor Section of a Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
632
637
.10.1115/1.2172617
9.
Motriuk
,
R. W.
, and
Harvey
,
D. P.
,
1998
, “
Centrifugal Compressor Modifications and Their Effect on High-Frequency Pipe Wall Vibration
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
120
(
3
), pp.
276
282
.10.1115/1.2842058
10.
Xing
,
Y.
,
Wu
,
X.
,
Jiang
,
P.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2010
, “
Dynamic Bayesian Evaluation Method for System Reliability Growth Based on in-Time Correction
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
59
(
2
), pp.
309
312
.10.1109/TR.2010.2044539
11.
Tang
,
Z.
,
Lu
,
Z.
, and
Lu
,
Y.
,
2011
, “
A Novel Reliability Model for Random Variables Lacking Sufficient Probability Information
,”
Eng. Mech.
,
28
(
4
), pp.
18
22
.http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-GCLX201104006.htm
12.
Balakrishnan
,
N.
,
Bordes
,
L.
, and
Zhao
,
X.
,
2010
, “
Minimum-Distance Parametric Estimation Under Progressive type-I Censoring
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
59
(
2
), pp.
413
425
.10.1109/TR.2010.2044615
13.
Huang
,
S.
,
Pan
,
R.
, and
Li
,
J.
,
2010
, “
A Graphical Technique and Penalized Likelihood Method for Identifying and Estimating Infant Failures
,”
IEEE Trans. Reliab.
,
59
(
4
), pp.
650
660
.10.1109/TR.2010.2055970
14.
Jiang
,
T.
,
Chen
,
J.
, and
Xu
,
Y.
,
2007
, “
A Semi-Analytic Method for Calculating Non-Probabilistic Reliability Index Based on Interval Models
,”
Appl. Math. Modell.
,
31
(
7
), pp.
1362
1370
.10.1016/j.apm.2006.02.013
15.
Luo
,
Y.
,
Kang
,
Z.
,
Luo
,
Z.
, and
Li
,
A.
,
2009
, “
Continuum Topology Optimization With Non-Probabilistic Reliability Constraints Based on Multi-Ellipsoid Convex Model
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
39
(
3
), pp.
297
310
.10.1007/s00158-008-0329-1
16.
Yao
,
C.
,
Chen
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Fuzzy Reliability Assessment Method Based on T-S Fault Tree and Bayesian Network
,”
J. Mech. Eng.
,
50
(
2
), pp.
193
201
.10.3901/JME.2014.02.193
17.
Biondini
,
F.
,
Bontempi
,
F.
, and
Giorgio
,
M. P.
,
2004
, “
Fuzzy Reliability Analysis of Concrete Structures
,”
Comput. Struct.
,
82
(
13–14
), pp.
1033
1052
.10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.011
18.
Simon
,
C.
, and
Weber
,
P.
,
2006
, “
Bayesian Networks Implementation of the Dempster Shafer Theory to Model Reliability Uncertainty
,”
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security
, Vienna, Austria, Apr. 20–22, pp.
241
249
.10.1109/ARES.2006.38
19.
Simon
,
C.
,
Weber
,
E.
, and
Evsukoff
,
A.
,
2008
, “
Bayesian Networks Inference Algorithm to Implement Dempster Shafer Theory in Reliability Analysis
,”
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.
,
93
(
7
), pp.
950
963
.10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.012
20.
Zhao
,
S.
,
Cheng
,
D.
, and
Liu
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Reliability Evaluation of Power Distribution System Based on D–S Evidence Inference and Bayesian Networks Method
,”
Trans. China Electrotech. Soc.
,
24
(
7
), pp.
134
138
.http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-DGJS200907023.htm
21.
Zissimos
,
P. M.
, and
Zhou
,
J.
,
2006
, “
A Design Optimization Method Using Evidence Theory
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
901
908
.10.1115/1.2204970
22.
Liu
,
P.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Yang
,
X.
,
2012
, “
Data Fusion of Distributed D–S Evidence Theory Based on Predicted Reliability
,”
Energy Procedia
,
11
(
3
), pp.
989
994
.10.1016/j.egypro.2011.10.346
23.
Jamshidi
,
J.
,
Owen
,
G. W.
, and
Mileham
,
A. R.
,
2006
, “
A New Data Fusion Method for Scanned Models
,”
ASME J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
340
348
.10.1115/1.2356498
24.
Wan
,
J.
,
Jiang
,
T.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Fan
,
Y.
,
2010
, “
An Information Fusion Method for Reliability Based on D–S Evidential Theory
,”
International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
,
IEEE
,
Xiamen, China
, Oct. 29–31, pp.
920
923
.10.1109/ICIEEM.2010.5646476
25.
Zhou
,
D.
,
Wei
,
T.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Chen
,
M.
,
Ma
,
S.
, and
Lu
,
Z.
,
2016
, “
A Novel Information Fusion Model Based on D–S Evidence Theory for Equipment Diagnosis
,”
ASME Paper No. IMECE2016-65292.
10.1115/IMECE2016-65292
26.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Wang
,
L.
,
Zhang
,
L.
, and
Yang
,
J.
,
2010
, “
D–S Evidence Theory Fusion Method Based on Forecast Reliability
,”
Fifth International Conference on Internet Computing for Science and Engineering
,
IEEE Computer Society
,
Heilongjiang, China
, Nov. 1–2, pp.
14
19
.10.1109/ICICSE.2010.23
You do not currently have access to this content.