Abstract

Corrosion in pipes is usually found in the form of closely spaced defects, which eventually reduce the pipe pressure carrying capacity and piping planned useful life. Codes and standards have been developed to evaluate the effect of such form of metal loss on the piping pressure carrying capacities. However, predictions of such codes are usually conservative, and hence, there is a need to assess their degree of conservatism. The present paper utilizes nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) in estimating pressure carrying capacities of defective pipes, and hence provides an evaluation of codes degree of conservatism. Shell elements with reduced thickness at the corrosion defect are adopted and their accuracy is assessed by comparison with those of solid elements as well as experimental test results. The influence of defects interaction is investigated by considering two neighboring defects in an inclined direction to each other. The influence of inclination angle, inclined proximity distance between the two defects, and the defect depth to wall thickness ratio are investigated. Comparisons were made with predictions of codes of practice in all cases. Code predictions were found to be conservative compared to FEA results. Furthermore, the interaction rule embedded in the codes for checking for interaction leads to inaccurate predictions for closely spaced defects as it does not include the effect of defect depth.

References

1.
Nali
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Avoiding Internal Corrosion With Glass Reinforced Plastic
,”
Pipeline Gas J.
,
239
(
3
), pp.
1
3
.https://pgjonline.com/magazine/2012/march-2012-vol-239-no-3/features/avoiding-internal-corrosion-with-glass-reinforced-plastic
2.
ASME
,
2009
, “
ASME B31G-Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines
,”
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
New York
,
Standard No. B31G-2012(R2017
).https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/find-codes-standards/b31g-manual-determining-remaining-strength-corroded-pipelines
3.
DNV
,
2015
, “
Recommended Practice
,”
DNV GL AS
,
Oslo, Norway
, Standard No. DNV-RP-F101.
4.
Stephens
,
D. R.
, and
Leis
,
B. N.
,
2000
, “
Development of an Alternative Criterion for Residual Strength of Corrosion Defects in Moderate- to High-Toughness Pipe
,”
ASME Paper No. IPC2000-192.
10.1115/IPC2000-192
5.
Levold
,
E.
,
Restelli
,
A.
,
Marchionni
,
L.
, Molinari, C., and
Vitali
,
L.
,
2013
, “
Strength and Deformation Capacity of Corroded Pipes: The Joint Industry Project.
,”
ASME Paper No. OMAE2013-10293.
10.1115/OMAE2013-10293
6.
Attia
,
M. S.
,
Megahed
,
M. M.
,
Darwish
,
M. A.
, and
Sundram
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Assessment of Corrosion Damage Acceptance Criteria in API579-ASME/1 Code
,”
Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des
,
12
(
1
), pp.
141
151
.10.1007/s10999-014-9278-6
7.
Mokhtari
,
M.
, and
Melchers
,
R. E.
,
2016
, “
Advanced Numerical Method for Failure Assessment of Corroded Steel Pipes
,”
International Ocean and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Rhodes, Greece
, June 26–July 2, pp.
380
385
.https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ISOPE-I-16-689
8.
Chen
,
Y.
,
Zhang
,
H.
,
Zhang
,
J.
,
Liu
,
X.
,
Li
,
X.
, and
Zhou
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Failure Assessment of X80 Pipeline With Interacting Corrosion Defects
,”
Eng. Fail. Anal.
,
47
, pp.
67
76
.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.013
9.
Benjamin
,
A. C.
,
Freire
,
J. L. F.
, and
Vieira
,
R. D.
,
2007
, “
Analysis of Pipeline Containing Interacting Corrosion Defects
,”
Exp. Tech.
,
31
(
3
), pp.
74
82
.10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00190.x
10.
Li
,
X.
,
Bai
,
Y.
,
Su
,
C.
, and
Li
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Effect of Interaction Between Corrosion Defects on Failure Pressure of Thin Wall Steel Pipeline
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessel. Piping
,
138
, pp.
8
18
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.01.002
11.
Benjamin
,
A. C.
,
Freire
,
J. L. F.
,
Vieira
,
R. D.
, and
Cunha
,
D. J. S.
,
2016
, “
Interaction of Corrosion Defects in Pipelines—Part 1: Fundamentals
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessel. Piping
,
144
, pp.
56
62
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.05.007
12.
Karstensen
,
A. D.
, and
Smith
,
A. T.
,
2001
, “
Corrosion Damage Assessment and Burst Test Validation of 8in X52 Linepipe
,”
ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
, ASME/PVP 430, Atlanta, GA, July 22–26, pp. 189–194.https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/tema%3ATEMA20020104849/corrosion-damage-assessment-and-burst-test-validation/
13.
Chouchaoui
,
B. A.
, and
Pick
,
R. J.
,
1994
, “
Behaviour of Circumferentially Aligned Corrosion Pits
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessel. Piping
,
57
(
1
), pp.
17
35
.10.1016/0308-0161(94)90052-3
14.
Chouchaoui
,
B. A.
, and
Pick
,
R. J.
,
1996
, “
Behaviour of Longitudinally Aligned Corrosion Pits
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessel. Piping
,
67
(
1
), pp.
17
35
.10.1016/0308-0161(94)00057-3
15.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Liang
,
Z.
, and
Han
,
C. J.
,
2015
, “
Effects of Ellipsoidal Corrosion Defects on Failure Pressure of Corroded Pipelines Based on Finite Element Analysis
,”
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.
,
10
(
6
), pp.
5036
5047
.http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol10/100605036.pdf
16.
ABAQUS
,
2014
,
ABAQUS Software V. 6.14
,
Dassault Systemes
,
Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
.
17.
API
,
2013
, “
Specification for Line Pipe API 5 L
,”
API
,
Washington, DC
.http://nimaazmoon.com/download/api/API-5L-2013.pdf
18.
Kamaya
,
M.
,
2016
, “
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping Ramberg e Osgood type Stress e Strain Curve Estimation Using Yield and Ultimate Strengths for Failure Assessments
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessel. Piping
,
137
, pp.
1
12
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.001
19.
Batte
,
D.
,
Fu
,
B.
,
Kirkwood
,
M. G.
, and
Vu
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Advanced Methods for Integrity Assessment of Corroded Pipelines
,”
Pipes Pipelines Int.
,
42
, pp.
5
11
.
20.
Han
,
C. J.
,
2016
, “
Failure Pressure Analysis of the Pipe With Inner Corrosion Defects by FEM
,”
Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.
,
11
(
2016
), pp.
5046
5062
.http://www.electrochemsci.org/papers/vol11/110605046.pdf
21.
Porter
,
M.
,
Martens
,
D.
, and
Marcal
,
P.
,
1999
, “
On Using Finite Element Analysis for Pressure Vessel Design
,”
ASME-Publ.-PVP
,
388
, pp.
3
6
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255579325_On_Using_Finite_Element_Analysis_for_Pressure_Vessel_Design
You do not currently have access to this content.