Analyses of the notched tension tests of carbon steel show that ductile failure is initiated when the sum of flow stress and mean stress reaches the limit for the material, regardless of stress triaxiality. Therefore, this explicit critical stress condition could be a candidate criterion for local failure. An equation expressing the relation between stress triaxiality and critical strain was derived from the critical stress condition, and it was found that the critical strain diagram obtained by the equation nearly overlapped with that obtained by the conventional empirical equation. This suggests that the critical stress condition can be approximately determined if the critical strain diagram was obtained for a particular steel. The critical stress condition was consistent with the classical void nucleation theory, and the theory was incorporated into the void nucleation term of stress control in the Gurson–Tvergaard (GT) model—a well-known damage mechanics model for ductile failure. Since only the strain-controlled term is used in the recent GT model, herein, a finite element method (FEM) code was newly developed to implement the GT model with the stress-controlled term. Notched tension tests were analyzed with the critical stress condition using the developed code, and the analyses reproduced the failure behaviors and critical strains of the tests considerably well. These results strongly support the practicality of the stress-based criterion and demonstrate that ductile failure could be appropriately predicted by combining the GT model using the void nucleation term of stress control with the critical stress condition.

References

1.
ASME
,
2015
, “
ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1-Subsection NE, Article NE-3213.8 Primary stress
,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
2.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
2000
, “
Design, Instrumentation, and Testing of a Steel Containment Vessel Model
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, Report No. NUREG/CR-5679,SAND 98-2701.
3.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
2006
, “
Containment Integrity Research at Sandia National Laboratories
,” Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, Report No. NUREG/CR-6906,SAND2006-2274P.
4.
ASME
,
2015
, “
ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2 Alternative Rules, Article 5.3 Protection Against Local Failure
,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
5.
Connelly
,
F. M.
, and
Davis
,
E. A.
,
1959
, “
Stress Distribution and Plastic Deformation in Rotating Cylinders of Strain-Hardening Material
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
, pp.
25
30
.
6.
Hancock
,
J. W.
, and
Mackenzie
,
S. C.
,
1976
, “
On the Mechanisms of Ductile Failure in High-Strength Steel Subjected to Multi-Axial Stress-States
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solid
,
24
(
2–3
), pp.
147
169
.
7.
Manjoine
,
M. J.
,
1982
, “
Creep-Rapture Behavior of Weldments
,”
Weld. Res. Suppl.
, pp.
50S
57S
.
8.
Otsuka
,
A.
,
Miyata
,
T.
,
Sakurai
,
T.
, and
Iida
,
H.
,
1985
, “
Effect of Stress Triaxiality on Ductile Fracture
,”
J. Soc. Mater. Sci., Jpn.
,
34
(
381
), pp.
622
626
.
9.
Dameron
,
R. A.
,
Dunham
,
R. S.
,
Rashid
,
Y. R.
, and
Tang
,
H. T.
,
1991
, “
Conclusions of the EPRI Concrete Containment Research Program
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
125
(
1
), pp.
41
55
.
10.
Bridgman
,
P. W.
,
1952
,
Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture
,
Mc-GRAWHill
,
New York
, pp.
9
37
.
11.
Enami
,
K.
, and
Nagai
,
H.
,
2005
, “
Evaluation of Plastic Deformation Limit by Circumferentially Notched Tension Test
,”
Tetsu-to-Hagane
,
91
(
2
), pp.
285
291
.
12.
Argon
,
A. S.
,
IM
,
J.
, and
Needleman
,
A.
,
1975
, “
Distribution of Plastic Strain and Negative Pressure in Necked Steel and Copper Bars
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
6A
, pp.
815
824
.
13.
Tsuchida
,
N.
,
Inoue
,
T.
, and
K
,
E.
,
2012
, “
Estimations of the True Stress and True Strain Until Just Before Fracture by the Stepwise Tensile Test and Bridgman Equation for Various Metals and Alloys
,”
Mater. Trans.
,
53
(
1
), pp.
133
139
.
14.
Yoshinari
,
H.
,
Enami
,
K.
,
Koseki
,
T.
, and
Shimanuki
,
H.
,
2001
, “
Ductile and Brittle Fracture Initiation Behavior for Compressively Prestrained Steel
,”
Conference Proceedings the Society of Naval Architects of Japan
, Tokyo, Japan, pp.
559
567
.
15.
Enami
,
K.
, and
Yoshinari
,
H.
,
2002
, “
On the Mechanics of Ductility-Decreasing of Compressively Prestrained Steel
,”
The Society of Naval Architects of Japan
, Kure, Japan, pp.
493
498
.
16.
Argon
,
A. S.
,
IM
,
J.
, and
Safoglu
,
R.
,
1975
, “
Cavity Formation From Inclusions in Ductile Fracture
,”
Metall. Trans.
,
6
(
4
), pp.
825
837
.
17.
Gurson
,
A. L.
,
1977
, “
Continuum Theory of Ductile Rupture by Void Nucleation and Growth—Part 1: Yield Criteria and Flow Rules for Porous Ductile Media
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
99
(
1
), pp.
2
15
.
18.
Chu
,
C. C.
, and
Needleman
,
A.
,
1980
, “
Void Nucleation Effects in Biaxially Stretched Sheets
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
102
(
3
), pp.
249
256
.
19.
Tvergaard
,
V.
,
1982
, “
On Localization in Ductile Materials Containing Spherical Voids
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
18
(4), pp.
237
252
.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00015686
20.
Tvergaard
,
V.
,
1990
, “
Material Failure by Void Growth to Coalescence
,”
Adv. Appl. Mech.
,
27
, pp.
83
151
.
21.
Tvergaard
,
V.
, and
Needleman
,
A.
,
1984
, “
Analysis of the Cup-Cone Fracture in a Round Tensile Bar
,”
Acta Metal
,
32
(
1
), pp.
157
169
.
22.
Oh
,
C.-S.
,
Kim
,
N.-H.
,
Kim
,
Y.-J.
,
Baek
,
J.-H.
,
Kim
,
Y.-P.
, and
Kim
,
W.-S.
,
2011
, “
A Finite Element Ductile Failure Simulation Method Using Stress-Modified Fracture Strain Model
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
,
78
(
1
), pp.
124
137
.
23.
Kami
,
A.
,
Dariani
,
B. M.
,
Sadough Vanini
,
A.
,
Comsa
,
D. S.
, and
Banabic
,
D.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Determination of the Forming Limit Curves of Anisotropic Sheet Metals Using GTN Damage Model
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
216
, pp.
472
483
.
24.
Kikuchi
,
M.
, and
Takahashi
,
A.
,
2001
, “
Dimple Fracture Simulation Under Differenr Loading Conditions
,”
Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. A
,
67
(
656
), pp.
665
671
.
25.
Dassault Systèmes
,
2016
, “
SIMULIA User Assistance 2017, Abaqus
,” Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France.
26.
ITOCHU Techno-Solutinos Corporation,
2017
, “
FINAS/STAR Version2015r170210, User Manual
,” ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
27.
Argon
,
A. S.
, and
IM
,
J.
,
1975
, “
Separation of Second Phase Particles in Spheroidized 1045 Steel, Cu-0.6Pct Cr. Alloy, and Maraging Steel in Plastic Straining
,”
Metall. Trans. A
,
6A
, pp.
839
851
.
28.
Needleman
,
A.
, and
Rice
,
J. R.
,
1978
, “
Limits to Ductility Set by Plastic Flow Location
,”
Mech. Sheet Met. Forming
, pp.
237
267
.https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-2880-3_10
29.
Tvergaard
,
V.
,
1981
, “
Influence of Voids on Shear Band Instability Under Plane Strain Conditions
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
17
(
4
), pp.
389
407
.
30.
Murakami
,
S.
,
2008
, “
Constitutive Equations for Ductile Damage of Void Materials
,”
Continuum Damage Mechanics (Japanese)
, Morikita Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
31.
Hughes
,
T. J.
,
1980
, “
Generalization of Selective Integration Procedures to Anisotropic and Nonlinear Media
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
,
15
(
9
), pp.
1413
1418
.
32.
Enami
,
K.
,
Hagiwara
,
Y.
, and
Mimura
,
H.
,
2004
, “
Assessment Method of Ductile and Brittle Fracture Initiation in High Strength Steels
,”
J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Jpn.
,
195
, pp.
263
270
.
33.
Shimanuki
,
H.
,
Inoue
,
T.
, and
Toyoda
,
M.
,
1999
, “
Effect of Stress Triaxiality and Strain Rate on Ductile Fracture Initiation in Steel
,”
The Society of Naval Architects of Japan
, Nagasaki, Japan, pp.
475
483
.
34.
Anderson
,
T. L.
,
2011
, “
Ductile Fracture
,”
Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Application
, 3rd ed., Morikita Publishing Co., Ltd., Tokyo, p.
234
(Japanese).
35.
Fujita
,
M.
,
Kawabe
,
Y.
, and
Nishimoto
,
N.
,
1977
, “
Role of Oxide and Sulfide Particles on Charpy Impact Properties in 10Ni-8Co Alloy Steels
,”
Tetsu to Hagane
,
63
(
10
), pp.
1709
17018
.
36.
Franklin
,
A.
,
1969
, “
Comparison Between a Quantitative Microscope and Chemical Methods for Assessment of Non‐Metallic Inclusions
,”
J. Iron Steel Inst.
,
207
, pp.
181
186
.
You do not currently have access to this content.