Abstract

Semi-submersible vehicles keep most of their hulls underwater while maintaining a small platform above the water surface. These craft can find use for both naval operations and civil transportation due to special properties, including the low above-water hull profile, reduced wave drag in some speed regimes, and potentially better seaworthiness. However, the hydrodynamics of these marine vehicles is not well studied. In this work, computational modeling is undertaken to explore steady hydrodynamic characteristics of several semi-submersible hull variations in a range of speeds in deep-water and finite-depth conditions. The validation and verification study is conducted using the experimental data obtained with a Suboff model in a near-surface regime. Parametric simulations are performed for this hull and two others generated by modifying the original Suboff geometry to produce narrow and wide hull shapes with similar volumes. The computational results indicate that the narrow hull excels in deep water, having lower drag and experiencing lower downward suction force and smaller longitudinal moment. However, in shallow-water operations, the narrow hull exhibits noticeably larger resistance than other hulls with the same displacement due to smaller gap between the hull and the sea floor. The main hydrodynamic characteristics of the studied hulls and illustrations of wave patterns are presented in the article. These findings can be useful for designers of semi-submersible vehicles.

References

1.
Dubrovsky
,
V. A.
,
Matveev
,
K. I.
, and
Sutulo
,
S.
,
2007
,
Small Waterplane Area Ships
,
Backbone Publishing Company
,
Fair Lawn, NJ
.
2.
Burcher
,
R.
, and
Rydill
,
L.
,
1994
,
Concepts in Submarine Design
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
3.
Alleman
,
P.
,
Kleiner
,
A.
,
Steed
,
C.
, and
Hook
,
D.
,
2009
, “
Development of a New Unmanned Semi-Submersible (USS) Vehicle
,”
Proceedings of IEEE OCEANS Conference
,
Biloxi, MS
,
Oct. 26–29
.
4.
Huo
,
C.
,
Zheng
,
Y.
, and
Gao
,
X.
,
2021
, “
Free-Running Tests on a Self-Propelled Submersible Multi-state Vehicle Model
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
236
, p.
109575
.
5.
Spino
,
P.
, and
Matveev
,
K. I.
,
2023
, “
Development and Testing of Unmanned Semi-Submersible Vehicle
,”
Unmanned Syst.
,
11
(
1
), pp.
83
91
.
6.
Sung
,
L. P.
,
Matveev
,
K. I.
, and
Morabito
,
M. G.
,
2023
, “
Exploratory Study of Design Parameters and Resistance Predictions for Semi-Submersible Vessels
,”
Naval Eng. J.
,
135
(
1
), pp.
185
203
.
7.
Alvarez
,
A.
,
Bertram
,
V.
, and
Gualdesi
,
L.
,
2009
, “
Hull Hydrodynamic Optimization of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Operating at Snorkeling Depth
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
36
(
1
), pp.
105
112
.
8.
Moonesun
,
M.
,
Ghasemzadeh
,
F.
,
Korol
,
Y.
,
Nikrasov
,
V.
,
Yastreba
,
A.
,
Ursolov
,
A.
, and
Mahdian
,
A.
,
2016
, “
Technical Notes on the Near Surface Experiments of Submerged Submarine
,”
Int. J. Marit. Technol.
,
5
, pp.
41
54
.
9.
Harwood
,
C.
,
Martin
,
J. E.
,
Di Napoli
,
I.
,
Arnold
,
A.
, and
Carrica
,
P.
,
2018
, “
Experimental and Numerical Investigation Into the Drag and Wave-Making of a Blunt Submersible
,”
Proceedings of 32nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
,
Hamburg, Germany
,
Aug. 5–10
.
10.
Amiri
,
M. M.
,
Esperanca
,
P. T.
,
Vitola
,
M. A.
, and
Sphaier
,
S. H.
,
2018
, “
How Does the Free Surface Affect the Hydrodynamics of a Shallowly Submerged Submarine?
,”
Appl. Ocean Res.
,
76
, pp.
34
50
.
11.
Matveev
,
K. I.
, and
Sung
,
L.
,
2022
, “
Hydrodynamics of Semi-Submersible Hull Model at Variable Submergences and Froude Numbers
,”
Proceedings of SNAME Maritime Convention
,
Houston, TX
,
Sept. 27–29
.
12.
Liu
,
H.
, and
Huang
,
T. T.
,
1998
, “Summary of DARPA Suboff Experimental Program Data,” Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division Report CRDKNSWC/HD-1298-11.
13.
Matveev
,
K. I.
,
2022
, “
Hydrodynamic Modeling of Fast Semi-Submersible Vehicle in Deep and Shallow Water
,”
Proceedings of OCEANS Conference.
,
Hampton Roads, VA
,
Oct. 17–20
.
14.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Peric
,
M.
,
1999
,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Springer
,
Berlin, Germany
.
15.
Hirt
,
C. W.
, and
Nichols
,
B. D.
,
1981
, “
Volume of Fluid (VOF) Methods for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
,
39
(
1
), pp.
201
225
.
16.
Rodi
,
W.
,
1991
, “
Experience With Two-Layer Models Combining the k-ɛ Model With a One-Equation Model Near the Wall
,”
Proceedings of 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
Reno, NV
, AIAA Paper No. 91-0216.
17.
Shih
,
T.-H.
,
Liou
,
W. W.
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
,
1995
, “
A New k-ɛ Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
24
(
3
), pp.
227
238
.
18.
Wheeler
,
M. P.
,
Matveev
,
K. I.
, and
Xing
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Validation Study of Compact Planing Hulls at Pre-Planing Speeds
,”
Proceedings of ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting
,
Montreal, Canada
,
July 15–20
.
19.
Matveev
,
K. I.
,
Wheeler
,
M. P.
, and
Xing
,
T.
,
2019
, “
Numerical Simulation of Air Ventilation and Its Suppression on Inclined Surface-Piercing Hydrofoils
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
175
, pp.
251
261
.
20.
De Luca
,
F.
,
Mancini
,
S.
,
Miranda
,
S.
, and
Pensa
,
C.
,
2016
, “
An Extended Verification and Validation Study of CFD Simulations for Planing Hulls
,”
J. Ship. Res.
,
60
(
2
), pp.
101
118
.
21.
Mulvany
,
N.
,
Tu
,
J. Y.
,
Chen
,
L.
, and
Anderson
,
B.
,
2004
, “
Assessment of Two-Equation Modeling for High Reynolds Number Hydrofoil Flows
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
,
45
(
3
), pp.
275
299
.
22.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1993
, “
Zonal Two Equation k-ω Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
Proceedings of AIAA 24th Fluid Dynamics Conference
,
Orlando, FL
. AIAA Paper No. 93-2906.
23.
Xing
,
T.
, and
Stern
,
F.
,
2010
, “
Factors of Safety for Richardson Extrapolation
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
132
(
6
), p.
061403
.
24.
International Towing Tank Conference
,
2017
, “Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures,” Publication 7.5-03-01-01.
25.
Matveev
,
K. I.
,
2005
, “
Application of Artificial Cavitation for Reducing Ship Drag
,”
Oceanic Eng. Int.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
35
41
.
26.
Dubrovsky
,
V.
, and
Matveev
,
K. I.
,
2006
, “
Small Waterplane Area Ship Models: Re-Analysis of Test Results Based on Scale Effect and Form Drag
,”
Ocean Eng.
,
33
(
7
), pp.
950
963
.
27.
Lee
,
C. M.
, and
Curphey
,
R. M.
,
1977
, “
Prediction of Motion, Stability, and Wave Load of Small-Waterplane-Area, Twin-Hull Ships
,”
SNAME Trans.
,
85
, pp.
94
130
.
28.
Kracht
,
A. M.
,
1999
, “
SWATH—Hull Forms With Low Destabilizing Pitch Moment
,”
Proceedings of International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles
,
Zevenwacht, South Africa
,
Mar. 17–19
.
29.
Morabito
,
M. G.
,
2013
, “
Planing in Shallow Water at Critical Speed
,”
J. Ship Res.
,
57
(
2
), pp.
98
111
.
You do not currently have access to this content.