Sloshing in LNG membrane tanks may cause large pressures on the tank structure. To keep the cargo at the required low temperature, the tank structure is covered with an insulation, which has a much less strength than steel. The containment system is a very complex structure, which consists of different materials and requires a careful analysis with due consideration of the load process and dynamic effects in the response. The structural response of the membrane tank wall is investigated in this paper by finite element analyses. First, a modal composition of the structural response is studied. It is shown that many modes contribute to the response, which makes it difficult to establish the simplified DLF approach. The dynamic structural response to a typical sloshing impact is investigated in detail. An important observation is that, although the containment system has traditionally been modeled with a rigid support, the steel plate that supports the insulation may be flexible under the relevant load conditions. It is shown that the flexibility of the steel plate causes significant stress variation in the insulation. Different response patterns of the Mark III containment system are presented, and mechanisms that cause large stress concentrations and different response patterns in the static and dynamic cases are discussed. The scaling issue in view of the response is also investigated. Various scaling formulations may apply in post-processing sloshing experiments. While the Froude law yields conservative scaling for pressure magnitude, its conservatism for scaling the time needs to be investigated in view of the relevant dynamic response. By analyzing the structural response to the differently scaled loads, it is found that the Froude approach is conservative, but the scatter of results may be very large.

1.
RINA
, 2006,
Proceedings of the International Conference on Design, Construction and Operation of Natural Gas Carriers and Offshore Systems, ICSOT
, Busan, Korea, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
2.
Wang
,
B.
,
Kim
,
J. W.
, and
Shin
,
Y.
, 2006
Strength Assessment of Membrane-Type LNG Containment System
,”
RINA (The Royal Institution of Naval Architects)
,
London
, Vol.
1
, pp.
179
187
.
3.
Moan
,
T.
,
Graczyk
,
M.
,
Shu
,
Z.
, and
Rognebakke
,
O.
, 2006, “
Recent Developments of Structural Design of Ships Based on Direct Calculations—With Emphasis on LNG Carriers
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Ship and Shipping Research, NAV
, Genova, Italy.
4.
Graczyk
,
M.
,
Moan
,
T.
, and
Wu
,
M. K.
, 2007, “
Extreme Sloshing and Whipping-Induced Pressures and Structural Response in Membrane LNG Tanks
,”
Ships and Offshore Structures
,
2
(
3
), pp.
201
216
. 1754-212X
5.
Arswendy
,
A.
, and
Moan
,
T.
, 2006, “
Sloshing Response of LNG Tank
,”
Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering (OMAE)
, Hamburg.
6.
Lee
,
H.
,
Kim
,
J. W.
, and
Hwang
,
C.
, 2004, “
Dynamic Strength Analysis for Membrane Type LNG Containment System due to Sloshing Impact Load
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Operation of Gas Carriers
, London, pp.
39
48
.
7.
Pastoor
,
W.
,
Østvold
,
T. K.
,
Byklum
,
E.
, and
Valsgård
,
S.
, 2005, “
Sloshing Load and Response in LNG Carriers for New Designs, New Operations and New Trades
,”
Proceedings of the Gastech
, Bilbao.
8.
Gavory
,
T.
, 2005, “
Innovative Tools Open Up New Prospects for Liquid Motion Model Tests
,”
Proceedings of the Gastech
, Bilbao.
9.
Paik
,
J. K.
, 2006, “
Limit State Design Technology for a Membrane Type Liquid Natural Gas Cargo Containment System Under Sloshing Impacts
,”
Marine Technology and Sname News
,
43
(
3
), pp.
126
134
.
10.
Chapot
,
M. K.
, 2002, “
CS1—New Containment System for LNG Carriers
,”
Proceedings of the Gastech Conference
, Doha.
11.
Lee
,
J. M.
,
Paik
,
J. K.
,
Kim
,
M. H.
,
Kim
,
W. S.
,
Noh
,
B. J.
, and
Choe
,
I. H.
, 2006,
Dynamic Strength Characteristics of Membrane Type LNG Cargo Containment System
,
RINA (The Royal Institution of Naval Architects)
,
London
, Vol.
1
, pp.
189
200
.
12.
Abramson
,
H. N.
,
Bass
,
R. L.
,
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
, and
Olsen
,
H. A.
, 1974, “
Liquid Slosh in LNG Carriers
,”
Proceedings of the Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics
, Cambridge, MA, pp.
371
388
.
13.
Faltinsen
,
O. M.
, 2005,
Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, New York
.
14.
Richardson
,
A. J.
,
Bray
,
W. H.
,
Sandström
,
R. E.
,
Lokken
,
R. T.
, and
Danaczko
,
M. A.
, 2005, “
Advances in Assessment of LNG Sloshing for Large Membrane Ships
,”
Proceedings of the Gastech
, Bilbao.
15.
Graczyk
,
M.
,
Moan
,
T.
, and
Rognebakke
,
O.
, 2006, “
Probabilistic Analysis of Characteristic Pressure for LNG Tanks
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng.
0892-7219,
128
, pp.
133
144
.
16.
Graczyk
,
M.
, and
Moan
,
T.
, 2008, “
A Probabilistic Assessment of Design Sloshing Pressure Time Histories in LNG Tanks
,”
Ocean Eng.
0029-8018,
35
, pp.
834
855
.
17.
Graczyk
,
M.
, 2008, “
Experimental Investigation of Sloshing Loading and Load Effects in Membrane LNG Tanks Subjected to Random Excitation
,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
18.
Meyerhoff
,
W. K.
, 1970, “
Added Masses of Thin Rectangular Plates Calculated From Potential Theory
,”
J. Ship Res.
0022-4502,
14
(
2
), pp.
100
111
.
You do not currently have access to this content.