Abstract

Designers are challenged to create sustainable products that resonate with customers, often focusing on engineered sustainability while neglecting perceived sustainability. We previously proposed a method for extracting perceived sustainable features from online reviews using annotations and natural language processing (NLP), testing our method with French press coffee carafes. We identified that perceived sustainability may not always align with engineered sustainability. We now investigate how designers can validate perceived features extracted from online reviews using a relatively new design method of collage placement where participants drag and drop products on a two-by-two axis collage and select features from a dropdown menu. We created collage activities for participants to evaluate French press products on the three aspects of sustainability: social, environmental, and economic, and on how much they like the products. During the activity, participants placed products along the two axes of the collage, sustainability and likeability, and labeled products with descriptive features. We found that participants more often selected our previously extracted features when placing products higher on the sustainability axis, validating that the perceived sustainable features resonate with users. We also measured a low correlation between the two axes of the collage activity, indicating that perceived sustainability and likeability can be measured separately. In addition, we found that product perceptions across sustainability aspects may differ between demographics. Based on these results, we confirm that the collage is an effective tool for validating sustainability perceptions and that features perceived as sustainable from online reviews resonate with customers when thinking of various sustainability aspects.

References

1.
de Medeiros
,
J. F.
,
Ribeiro
,
J. L. D.
, and
Cortimiglia
,
M. N.
,
2016
, “
Influence of Perceived Value of Purchasing Decisions of Green Products in Brazil
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
110
(
1
), pp.
158
169
.
2.
El Dehaibi
,
N.
,
Goodman
,
N. D.
, and
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
2019
, “
Extracting Customer Perceptions of Product Sustainability From Online Reviews
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
12
), p.
121103
.
3.
Sheth
,
J. N.
,
Sethia
,
N. K.
, and
Srinivas
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Mindful Consumption: A Customer-Centric Approach to Sustainability
,”
J. Acad. Mark. Sci.
,
39
(
1
), pp.
21
39
.
4.
Peterson
,
M.
, and
Brockhaus
,
S.
,
2017
, “
Dancing in the Dark: Challenges for Product Developers to Improve and Communicate Product Sustainability
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
161
(
1
), pp.
345
354
.
5.
MacDonald
,
E. F.
, and
She
,
J.
,
2015
, “
Seven Cognitive Concepts for Successful Eco-Design
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
92
, pp.
23
36
.
6.
O’Rourke
,
D.
, and
Ringer
,
A.
,
2015
, “
The Impact of Sustainability Information on Consumer Decision Making
,”
J. Ind. Technol.
,
20
(
4
), pp.
882
892
.
7.
She
,
J.
, and
MacDonald
,
E. F.
,
2018
, “
Exploring the Effects of a Product’s Sustainability Triggers on Pro-Environmental Decision-Making
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
140
(
1
), p.
011102
.
8.
Joung
,
J.
, and
Kim
,
H. M.
,
2020
, “
Automated Keyword Filtering in LDA for Identifying Product Attributes From Online Reviews
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
143
(
8
), p.
084501
.
9.
Hou
,
T.
,
Yannou
,
B.
,
Leroy
,
Y.
, and
Poirson
,
E.
,
2019
, “
Mining Changes in User Expectation Over Time From Online Reviews
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
141
(
9
), p.
091102
.
10.
Goldstein
,
E. B.
, and
Brockmole
,
J. R.
,
2016
,
Sensation and Perceptions
, 10th ed.,
Cengage Learning
,
Boston, MA
, pp.
3
22
.
11.
Papista
,
E.
, and
Krystallis
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework
,”
J. Bus. Ethics
,
115
(
1
), pp.
75
92
.
12.
MacDonald
,
E.
,
Gonzalez
,
R.
, and
Paplambros
,
P.
,
2007
, “
The Construction of Preferences for Crux and Sentinel Product Attributes
,”
International Conference on Engineering Design
,
Paris, France
,
Aug. 28–31
, pp.
609
626
.
13.
Borin
,
N.
,
Cerf
,
D. C.
, and
Krishnan
,
R.
,
2011
, “
Consumer Effects of Environmental Impact in Product Labeling
,”
J. Consum. Mark.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
76
86
.
14.
Maccioni
,
L.
,
Borgianni
,
Y.
, and
Basso
,
D.
,
2019
, “
Value Perception of Green Products: An Exploratory Study Combining Conscious Answers and Unconscious Behavioral Aspects
,”
Sustainability
,
11
(
5
), p.
1226
.
15.
Steenis
,
N. D.
,
van Herpen
,
E.
,
van der Lans
,
I. A.
,
Ligthart
,
T. N.
, and
van Trijp
,
H. C. M.
,
2017
, “
Consumer Response to Packaging Design: The Role of Packaging Materials and Graphics in Sustainability Perceptions and Product Evaluations
,”
J. Cleaner Prod.
,
162
(
1
), pp.
286
298
.
16.
Catlin
,
J. R.
,
Luchs
,
M. G.
, and
Phipps
,
M.
,
2017
, “
Consumer Perceptions of the Social vs. Environmental Dimensions of Sustainability
,”
J. Consum. Policy
,
40
(
1
), pp.
245
277
.
17.
Rai
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Identifying Key Product Attributes and Their Importance Levels From Online Customer Reviews
,”
ASME 2012 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
,
Chicago, IL
,
Aug. 12–15
, pp.
533
540
.
18.
Guyton
,
A. A.
,
2006
, “
Developing Sustainable Product Semantics for Consumer Products: A Sustainable Designer’s Guide
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Atlanta, GA
.
19.
Liao
,
T.
, and
MacDonald
,
E.
,
2019
, “
Revealing Insights of Users’ Perceptions: An Approach to Evaluate Wearable Products Based on Emotions
,”
International Conference on Engineering Design
,
Delft, Netherland
,
Aug. 5–8
, p. E14.
20.
McCaskill
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Consumer-Goods’ Brands That Demonstrate Commitment to Sustainability Outperform Those That Don’t
,” Nielsen (online), https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/press-room/2015/consumer-goods-brands-that-demonstrate-commitment-to-sustainability-outperform.html
21.
Goodman
,
J. K.
, and
Paolacci
,
G.
,
2017
, “
Crowdsourcing Consumer Research
,”
J. Consum. Res.
,
44
(
1
), pp.
196
210
.
22.
Paolacci
,
G.
, and
Chandler
,
J.
,
2014
, “
Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a Participant Pool
,”
Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
,
23
(
3
), pp.
184
188
.
23.
Maxwell
,
S. E.
, and
Delaney
,
H. D.
,
2003
,
Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective
, 3rd ed.,
Taylor and Francis
,
New York
, pp.
724
745
.
24.
Bakdash
,
J. Z.
, and
Marusich
,
L. R.
,
2017
, “
Repeated Measures Correlation
,”
Front. Psychol.
,
8
(
456
), pp.
1
13
.
25.
Luchs
,
M. G.
,
Naylor
,
R. W.
,
Irwin
,
J. R.
, and
Raghunathan
,
R.
,
2010
, “
The Sustainability Liability: Potential Negative Effects of Ethicality on Product Preference
,”
J. Mark.
,
74
(
5
), pp.
18
31
.
You do not currently have access to this content.