A product platform is a set of common components, modules or parts from which a stream of derivative products can be created. Product platform design requires selection of the shared parts and assessment of the potential sacrifices in individual product performance that result from parts sharing. A multicriteria optimization problem can be formulated to study such decisions in a quantitative manner at the product performance level. Studying the Pareto sets that correspond to various derivative products leads to a systematic methodology for design decision making. Design of a nail gun platform is used to illustrate the concepts presented.

1.
Kekre
,
S.
, and
Srinivasan
,
K.
,
1990
, “
Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
36
, pp.
1216
1231
.
2.
Whitney
,
D. E.
,
1993
, “
Nippondenso Co. Ltd.: A Case Study of Strategic Product Design
,”
Res. Eng. Des.
,
5
, pp.
1
20
.
3.
Meyer, M. H., and Lehnerd, A. P., 1997, The Power of Product Platforms, The Free Press, New York, NY.
4.
Baker
,
K. R.
,
Magazine
,
M. J.
, and
Nuttle
,
H. L. W.
,
1986
, “
The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
32
, pp.
982
988
.
5.
Gerchak
,
Y.
,
Magazine
,
M. J.
,
Gamble
,
A. B.
,
1988
, “
Component Commonality With Service Level Requirements
,”
Manage. Sci.
34
, pp.
753
760
.
6.
Martin, M. W., and Ishii, K., 1996, “Design for Variety: A Methodology for Understanding the Costs of Product Proliferation,” Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Irvine, CA., DTM-1610.
7.
Ulrich
,
K.
,
1995
, “
The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm
,”
Res. Policy
,
24
, pp.
419
440
.
8.
Siddique, Z., Rosen, D. W., and Wang, N., 1998, “On the Applicability of Product Variety Design Concepts to Automotive Platform Commonality,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, ASME, Atlanta, GA., DTM-5661.
9.
Fisher
,
M.
,
Ramdas
,
K.
, and
Ulrich
,
K.
,
1999
, “
Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: A Study of Automotive Braking Systems
,”
Manage. Sci.
45
, pp.
297
315
.
10.
Gonzalez-Zugasti, J. P., Otto, K. N., and Baker, J. D., 1998, “A Method for Architecting Product Platforms With an Application to Interplanetary Mission Design,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, ASME, Atlanta, GA., DAC-5608.
11.
Ishii, K., Juengel, C., and Eubanks, C. F., 1995, “Design for Variety: Key to Product Line Structuring,” Proceedings of the 1995 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Design Theory and Methodology, ASME, Boston, MA., pp. 499–506.
12.
MacDuffie
,
J. P.
,
Sethuraman
,
K.
, and
Fisher
,
M. L.
,
1996
, “
Product Variety and Manufacturing Performance
,”
Manage. Sci.
,
42
, pp.
350
369
.
13.
Eschenauer, H., Koski, J., Osyczka, A., Eds., 1990, Multicriteria Design Optimization, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
14.
Osyczka, A., 1985, Multicriteria Optimization in Engineering With FORTRAN Programs, Wiley, New York, NY.
15.
Statnikov, R. B., and Matusov, J. B., 1995, Multicriteria Optimization and Engineering, Chapman & Hall, New York, NY.
16.
Freiheit
,
T. I.
, and
Rao
,
S. S.
,
1991
, “
A Modified Game Theory Approach to Multiobjective Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
113
, pp.
286
291
.
17.
Koski, J., 1993, “Multicriteria Optimization in Structural Design State of the Art,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Design Automation Conference, Vol. 1, ASME, Albuquerque, NM., pp. 621–629.
18.
Athan, T. W., 1994, “A Quasi-Monte Carlo Method for Multicriteria Optimization,” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
19.
Das, I., 1997, “Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization and Robust Optimization,” Ph.D. thesis, Rice Univ., Houston, TX.
20.
Fujita, K., Yoneda, T., Akagi, S., and Ishikawa, M., 1998, “Simultaneous Optimization of Product Family Sharing System Structure and Configuration,” Proceedings of the 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, ASME, Atlanta, GA., DFM-5722.
21.
Das
,
I.
,
1999
, “
On Characterizing the “Knee” of the Pareto Curve Based on Normal-Boundary Intersection
,”
Struct. Optim.
18
, pp.
107
115
.
You do not currently have access to this content.