The problem of robust design is treated as a bi-objective optimization problem in which the performance mean and variation are optimized and minimized, respectively. A method for deriving a utility function as a local approximation of the efficient frontier is presented and investigated at different locations of candidate solutions, with different ranges of interest, and for efficient frontiers with both convex and nonconvex behaviors. As an integral part of the interactive robust design procedure earlier proposed by the authors, the method assists designers in adjusting the preference structure and exploring alternative efficient robust design solutions. It eliminates the need of solving the bi-objective problem repeatedly using new preference structures, which is often computationally expensive. Though demonstrated for robust design problems, the principle is also applicable to any bi-objective optimization problem. [S1050-0472(00)00702-9]

Issue Section:
Technical Briefs
Keywords:
design engineering, optimisation, decision theory, approximation theory, nonlinear programming, Robust Design, Multiobjective Optimization, Efficient Solutions, Utility Function, Decision Analysis
Topics:
Approximation, Design, Optimization, Preferences
1.
Otto, K. N., and Antonsson, E. K., 1991, “Extensions to the Taguchi Method of Product Design,” Third International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, Stauffer, L. A., ed., Miami, Florida, pp. 21–30.
2.
Parkinson
,
A.
,
Sorensen
,
C.
, and
Pourhassan
,
N.
,
1993
, “
A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,”
Trans. ASME
,
115
, pp.
74
–
80
.
3.
Sundares¸an, S., Ishii, K., and Houser, D. R., 1993, “A Robust Optimization Procedure with Variations on Design Variables and Constraints,” Advances in Design Automation, ASME DE-Vol. 69-1, pp. 379–386.
4.
Cagan, J., and Williams, B. C., 1993, “First-Order Necessary Conditions for Robust Optimality,” Advances in Design Automation, ASME DE-Vol. 65-1, pp. 539–549.
5.
Chen
,
W.
,
Allen
,
J. K.
,
Mistree
,
F.
, and
Tsui
,
K.-L.
,
1996
, “
A Procedure for Robust Design: Minimizing Variations Caused by Noise Factors and Control Factors
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
118
, pp.
478
–
485
.
6.
Su
,
I.
, and
Renaud
,
J. E.
,
1997
, “
Automatic Differentiation in Robust Optimization
,”
AIAA J.
,
35
, No.
6
, p.
1072
1072
.
7.
Iyer, H. V., and Krishnamurty, S., 1998, “A Preference-Based Robust Design Metric,” 1998 ASME Design Technical Conference, Paper No. DAC5625, Atlanta, GA.
8.
Mulvey
,
J.
,
Vanderber
,
R.
, and
Zenios
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems
,”
Oper. Res.
,
43
, pp.
264
–
281
.
9.
Das, I., and Dennis, J. E., 1996, “Normal Boundary Intersection: A New Method for Generating Pareto Optimal Points in Nonlinear Multicriteria Optimization Problems,” from http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/∼indra/NBIhomepage.html.
10.
Jahn
,
J.
, and
Merkel
,
A.
,
1992
, “
Reference Point Approximation Method for the Solution of Bicriteria Optimization Problems
,”
J. Optim. Theory Appl.
,
74
, pp.
87
–
103
.
11.
Cheng
,
F. Y.
, and
Li
,
D.
,
1997
, “
Multi-objective Optimization Design with Pareto Genetic Algorithms
,”
J. Struct. Eng.
,
123
, pp.
1252
–
1261
.
12.
Grignon, P., and Fadel, G. M., 1997, “Quality Criteria Measures for Multi-objective Solutions Obtained with a Genetic Algorithm,” CD Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, April 7–10, 1997.
13.
Li, Y., Fadel, G. M., and Wiecek, M. M., 1998, “Approximating Pareto Curves Using the Hyper-Ellipse,” Proceedings of the 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Symposium, 3, pp. 1990–2002.
14.
Tappeta, R. V., and Renaud, J. E., 1998, “
Interactive Multiobjective Optimization Procedure,” to appear in AIAA J.
15.
Chen
,
W.
,
Wiecek
,
M.
, and
Zhang
,
J.
,
1999
, “
Quality Utility: A Compromise Programming Approach to Robust Design
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
121
, No.
2
, pp.
179
–
187
.
16.
Tind
,
J.
, and
Wiecek
,
M. M.
,
1999
, “
Augmented Lagrangian and Tchebycheff Approaches in Multiple Objective Programming
,”
J. Global Optim.
,
14-3
, pp.
251
–
266
.
17.
Haimes, Y. Y., and Chankong, V., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology, North Holland, New York.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.