Compliant mechanisms are jointless mechanical devices that take advantage of elastic deformation to achieve a force or motion transformation. An important step toward automated design of compliant mechanisms has been the development of topology optimization techniques. The next logical step is to incorporate size and shape optimization to perform dimensional synthesis of the mechanism while simultaneously considering practical design specifications such as kinematic and stress constraints. An improved objective formulation based on maximizing the energy throughput of a linear static compliant mechanism is developed considering specific force and displacement operational requirements. Parametric finite element beam models are used to perform the size and shape optimization. This technique allows stress constraints to limit the maximum stress in the mechanism. In addition, constraints which restrict the kinematics of the mechanism are successfully applied to the optimization problem. Resulting optimized mechanisms exhibit efficient mechanical transmission and meet kinematic and stress requirements. Several examples are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the optimization procedure.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Compliant mechanisms, Shape optimization, Stress, Kinematics, Optimization, Design, Deformation, Displacement, Finite element analysis, Mechanical drives, Topology
1.
Ananthasuresh
G.
,
Kota
S.
, and
Kikuchi
N.
,
1994
, “
Strategies for Systematic Synthesis of Compliant MEMS
,”
Dynamic Systems and Control
, DSC-Vol.
55-2
, 1994 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, November, pp.
677
–
686
.
2.
Burns, R., and Crossely, F., 1968, “Kinetostatic Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms,” ASME Paper 68-Mech-36.
3.
Gere, J., and Timoshenko, S., 1984, Mechanics of Materials. Second edition, Wadsworth, Inc., California.
4.
Howell
L.
, and
Midha
A.
,
1996
, “
A Loop-Closure Theory for the Analysis and Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
118
, pp.
121
–
125
.
5.
Haug, E., Choi, K., and Komkov, V., 1986, Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press Inc., Florida.
6.
Frecker
M.
,
Ananthasuresh
G.
,
Nishiwaki
S.
,
Kikuchi
N.
, and
Kota
S.
,
1997
, “
Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms Using Multi-Criteria Optimization
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
119
, pp.
238
–
245
.
7.
Larsen
U.
,
Sigmund
O.
, and
Bouwstra
S.
,
1997
, “
Design and Fabrication of Compliant Micromechanisms and Structures with Negative Poisson’s Ratio
,”
Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems
, Vol.
6
, No.
2
, pp.
99
–
106
.
8.
Murphy
M. D.
,
Midha
A.
, and
Howell
L. L.
,
1996
, “
The Topological Synthesis of Compliant Mechanisms
,”
Mechanism and Machine Theory
, Vol.
31
, No.
2
, pp.
185
–
199
.
9.
Paros, J., and Weisbord, L., 1965, “How to Design Flexure Hinges,” Machine Design, Nov. 25, 1965, pp. 151–156.
10.
Salamon, L., and Midha, A., 1992, “An Introduction to Mechanical Advantage in Compliant Mechanisms,” Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 44-2, 18th ASME Design Automation Conference, Scottsdale, AZ, Sept. 13–16, pp. 47–51.
11.
Sevak, N., and McLarnan, C., 1974, “Optimal Synthesis of Flexible Link Mechanisms with Large Static Deflectors,” ASME Paper No. 74-DET-83.
12.
Tuttle, S., 1967, Mechanisms for Engineering Design, Chapter 8: Semifixed Flexural Mechanisms, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.