This paper presents a comprehensive experimental study in exploring the influence of key printing parameters on mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) material. Three parameters with three levels—layer thickness (0.09 mm, 0.19 mm, and 0.39 mm), printing plane (XY, YZ, and ZX), and printing orientation (horizontal, diagonal, and vertical)—are considered, which form an L27 experimental design. Following L27, tensile and compressive specimens are fabricated and tested. Young's modulus, yield strength, failure strength, and strain of specimens are measured, evaluated, and compared with their injection-molded counterparts. Experimental results indicate that tensile specimens with a layer thickness of 0.09 mm and printing plane orientation of YZ-H reveal the highest stiffness and failure strength. While injection-molded specimen shows the highest yield strength, ductility of printed specimens is 1.45 times larger than that of injection-molded part. YZ along with XY specimens shows a neat and clean standard fracture failure at 45 deg, where the layers reorient themselves followed by stretching before fracture failure, thus providing sufficient ductility as opposed to ZX specimens, which fail along the direction perpendicular to the loading. Compressive XY-H and XY-D specimens have the highest stiffness and yield strength, and failure mechanisms involve initial compression followed by squeezing of layers leading to compactness followed by breakage due to tearing off or fracture of layers. The findings imply that anisotropy of fused deposition modeling (FDM) parts cannot be avoided and hence the appropriate parameters must be chosen, which satisfy the intended properties of the material subject to specific loading scenario.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2017
Research-Article
Evaluating Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms of Fused Deposition Modeling Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Parts
M. S. Uddin,
M. S. Uddin
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
e-mail: Mohammad.Uddin@unisa.edu.au
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
e-mail: Mohammad.Uddin@unisa.edu.au
Search for other works by this author on:
M. F. R. Sidek,
M. F. R. Sidek
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
M. A. Faizal,
M. A. Faizal
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Reza Ghomashchi,
Reza Ghomashchi
School of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Pramanik
A. Pramanik
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Curtin University,
Bentley, WA 6845, Australia
Curtin University,
Bentley, WA 6845, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
M. S. Uddin
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
e-mail: Mohammad.Uddin@unisa.edu.au
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
e-mail: Mohammad.Uddin@unisa.edu.au
M. F. R. Sidek
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
M. A. Faizal
School of Engineering,
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
University of South Australia,
Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
Reza Ghomashchi
School of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
University of Adelaide,
Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
A. Pramanik
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Curtin University,
Bentley, WA 6845, Australia
Curtin University,
Bentley, WA 6845, Australia
Manuscript received November 2, 2016; final manuscript received May 1, 2017; published online June 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Sam Anand.
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Aug 2017, 139(8): 081018 (12 pages)
Published Online: June 1, 2017
Article history
Received:
November 2, 2016
Revised:
May 1, 2017
Citation
Uddin, M. S., Sidek, M. F. R., Faizal, M. A., Ghomashchi, R., and Pramanik, A. (June 1, 2017). "Evaluating Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms of Fused Deposition Modeling Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Parts." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. August 2017; 139(8): 081018. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036713
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Related Articles
Mechanical Properties and Fracture Resistance of 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,2024)
Mechanical Behavior of Differently Oriented Electron Beam Melting Ti–6Al–4V Components Using Digital Image Correlation
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,2019)
Plastic Deformation of a Laminated Plate With a Hole
J. Appl. Mech (December,1980)
Fracture of Wrinkled Pipes Subjected to Monotonic Deformation: An Experimental Investigation
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2011)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
In Situ Observations of the Failure Mechanisms of Hydrided Zircaloy-4
Zirconium in the Nuclear Industry: 20th International Symposium
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range