This paper presents an investigation of fixel design alternatives for active (dynamic) fixturing to be incorporated into mesoscale manufacturing systems. Using simple compliant mechanisms and components, fixels exhibiting mechanically adjustable stiffness characteristics are achievable. Via manual or automated stiffness adjustments, these fixels provide functionality for enabling greater control of the dynamic response of the workpiece subject to vibrations and/or variations in contact forces at the tool-workpiece-fixture interface. To quantify the fixel functionality, this paper presents theoretical models of the stiffness characteristics expressed as a function of the mechanical variable(s), thus forming a basis for exploring the adjustability in stiffness achievable for each fixel design. Also presented are results of the dynamic behavior of the active fixturing implemented in a milling process based on a “regenerative force, dynamic deflection model” augmented with the active fixturing variable stiffness model and inclusion of tool runout. These simulation results indicate the expected performance of the active fixturing upon its implementation in actual fixturing for the creation of micron features on micro- and macroparts.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: trippere@ufl.edu
e-mail: koustubh.jrao@ufl.edu
e-mail: gwiens@ufl.edu
Article navigation
April 2011
Technical Briefs
Modeling and Analysis of Fixel Designs for Micromanufacturing Active Fixturing
Troy B. Rippere,
Troy B. Rippere
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
e-mail: trippere@ufl.edu
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611
Search for other works by this author on:
Koustubh J. Rao,
Koustubh J. Rao
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
e-mail: koustubh.jrao@ufl.edu
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611
Search for other works by this author on:
Gloria J. Wiens
Gloria J. Wiens
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
e-mail: gwiens@ufl.edu
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611
Search for other works by this author on:
Troy B. Rippere
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611e-mail: trippere@ufl.edu
Koustubh J. Rao
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611e-mail: koustubh.jrao@ufl.edu
Gloria J. Wiens
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
University of Florida
, Gainesville, FL 32611e-mail: gwiens@ufl.edu
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Apr 2011, 133(2): 024505 (4 pages)
Published Online: March 30, 2011
Article history
Received:
March 16, 2009
Revised:
March 4, 2011
Online:
March 30, 2011
Published:
March 30, 2011
Citation
Rippere, T. B., Rao, K. J., and Wiens, G. J. (March 30, 2011). "Modeling and Analysis of Fixel Designs for Micromanufacturing Active Fixturing." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. April 2011; 133(2): 024505. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003784
Download citation file:
49
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Acoustic Streaming-Assisted Underwater Laser Micromachining Process
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (September 2025)
Feed Rate Improvement for Face Hobbing on a Six-Axis CNC Bevel Gear-Cutting Machine
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (September 2025)
Related Articles
Design of Compliant Mechanisms for Minimizing Input Power in Dynamic Applications
J. Mech. Des (October,2007)
Metrics for Evaluation and Design of Large-Displacement Linear-Motion Compliant Mechanisms
J. Mech. Des (January,2012)
Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of Thin-Walled Aerospace Structures for Fixture Design in Multiaxis Milling
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (June,2008)
A Kinetoelastic Formulation of Compliant Mechanism Optimization
J. Mechanisms Robotics (May,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
GD&T as a Language
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing Handbook: Applications, Analysis & Measurement
GD&T as a Language
Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing: Applications, Analysis, Gauging and Measurement [per ASME Y14.5-2018]
Accuracy of an Axis
Mechanics of Accuracy in Engineering Design of Machines and Robots Volume I: Nominal Functioning and Geometric Accuracy