The blank holder force (BHF), which regulates the amount of metal drawn into the die cavity, has been used effectively to draw defect-free sheet parts. It has been shown that a properly designed variable BHF profile can provide greater drawability as compared to constant BHF. Extensive research has been carried out in the past to determine this optimal profile. However, these deterministic efforts neglect the sensitivity of this optimal BHF design to unintended process variations inherent in sheet forming. This paper investigates the reliability of optimal variable BHF in the presence of process uncertainties by minimizing the magnitude of wrinkling and fracture defects under probabilistic constraints. To demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, it analyzes the conical cup drawing of an aluminum killed deep-drawing quality steel under process uncertainties including sheet thickness, punch speed, interface friction at the punch surface, and interface friction at the die surface. The results show that probabilistic design improves the yield (probability of good parts) to 99.98% as compared to the 48.04% yield realized by the traditional deterministic design. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations verify that the probabilistic design handles the uncertainties better due to its inherent robustness. This is primarily due to the design moving away from the process constraints and at the same time balancing the probability of failure between the two failure modes.

1.
Hirose
,
Y.
,
Hishida
,
Y.
,
Furubayashi
,
T.
,
Oshima
,
M.
, and
Ujihara
,
S.
, 1990, “
Part II: Applications of BHF-Controlled Forming Techniques
,”
Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium of the Japanese Society for the Technology of Plasticity
,
Tokyo
.
2.
Hardt
,
D. E.
, and
Fenn
,
R. C.
, 1993, “
Real-Time Control of Sheet Stability During Forming
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
115
(
3
), pp.
299
308
.
3.
Sim
,
H. B.
, and
Boyce
,
M. C.
, 1992, “
Finite Element Analysis of Real-Time Stability Control in Sheet Forming Processes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
0094-4289,
114
(
2
), pp.
180
188
.
4.
Cao
,
J.
, and
Boyce
,
M. C.
, 1994, “
Design and Control of Forming Parameters Using Finite Element Analysis
,”
Computational Material Modeling, ASME PVP
, Vol.
294
, pp.
265
285
.
5.
Sheng
,
Z. Q.
,
Jirathearanat
,
S.
, and
Altan
,
T.
, 2004, “
Adaptive FEM Simulation for Prediction of Variable Blank Holder Force in Conical Cup Drawing
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
44
, pp.
487
494
.
6.
Majeske
,
K. D.
, and
Hammett
,
P. C.
, 2003, “
Identifying Sources of Variation in Sheet Metal Stamping
,”
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
,
15
, pp.
5
18
.
7.
Gantar
,
G.
, and
Kuzman
,
K.
, 2002, “
Sensitivity and Stability Evaluation of the Deep Drawing Process
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
125–126
, pp.
302
308
.
8.
Karthik
,
V.
,
Comstock
,
R. J.
,
Hershberger
,
D. L.
, and
Wagoner
,
R. H.
, 2002, “
Variability of Sheet Formability and Formability Testing
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
121
, pp.
350
362
.
9.
Cao
,
J.
, and
Kinsey
,
B. L.
, 2001, “
Next Generation Stamping Dies—Controllability and Flexibility
,”
Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manufact.
0736-5845,
17
, pp.
49
56
.
10.
Sahai
,
A.
,
Cao
,
J.
, and
Xia
,
C. Z.
, 2004, “
Sequential Optimization and Reliability Assessment Method for Metal Forming Processes
,”
NUMIFORM
,
S.
Ghosh
,
J. C.
Castro
, and
J. K.
Lee
, eds.,
Columbus
,
OH.
, June, pp.
2009
2013
.
11.
Haldar
,
A.
and
Mahadevan
,
S.
, 2000,
Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
12.
Buranathiti
,
T.
,
Cao
,
J.
,
Xia
,
Z. C.
, and
Chen
,
W.
, 2005, “
Probabilistic Design in a Sheet Metal Stamping Process Under Failure Analysis
,”
NUMISHEET
,
L. M.
Smith
,
F.
Pourboghrat
,
J.
Cao
,
T. B.
Stoughton
,
J.-W.
Yoon
,
M. F.
Shi
,
C.-T.
Wang
, and
L.
Zhang
, eds.,
Detroit
,
MI
, Aug. 15–19, pp.
867
872
.
13.
Li
,
Y. Q.
,
Cui
,
Z. S.
,
Ruan
,
X. Y.
, and
Zhang
,
D. J.
, 2005, “
Application of Six Sigma Robust Optimization in Sheet Metal Forming
,”
NUMISHEET
,
L. M.
Smith
et al.
, eds.,
Detroit
,
MI
, Aug. 15–19, pp.
819
824
.
14.
Sirkirk
,
J. F.
, 1986, “
Process Variable Effects on Sheet Metal Quality
,”
J. Applied Metalworking, American Society of Materials
,
4
, pp.
262
269
.
15.
Jaisigh
,
A.
, and
Narasimhan
,
K.
, 2004, “
Sensitivity Analysis of a Deep Drawing Process for Miniaturized Products
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
147
, pp.
321
327
.
16.
Zhang
,
W. F.
,
Sheng
,
Z. Q.
, and
Shivpuri
,
R.
, 2005, “
Probabilistic Design of Aluminum Sheet Drawing for Reduced Risk of Wrinkling and Fracture
,”
NUMISHEET
,
L. M.
Smith
et al.
, eds.,
Detroit
,
MI
, Aug. 15–19, pp.
247
252
.
17.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
, and
Myers
,
R. H.
, 1995,
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
You do not currently have access to this content.