It is well known that there is a large variance of fatigue life associated with the data of fatigue tests under nominally identical conditions. Understanding and controlling this variance are essential to enhance the safety and competitiveness of designing and manufacturing fatigue critical products. However, no analytical model quantitatively linking input variables with the variance of fatigue life has been found in current literature. To address this issue, a methodology for analytically predicting the variance of fatigue life is proposed. Using this methodology, the variance of fatigue life can be decomposed into individual components. The significance of this decomposition is two-fold. First, it provides a tool for pinpointing key driving factors of the variance of fatigue life, which is essential for the variance reduction of fatigue life. Second, the time consuming and costly fatigue tests to obtain critical variance information for reliability design may be divided into less time consuming tests for obtaining variance information for individual variables contributing to fatigue variance. Based on the variance prediction tool, a methodology for systematically incorporating manufacturing influence into the prediction of variance and average value of fatigue life is proposed. A verification model is built to predict the variance and average value of fatigue life of a structure with a central hole in the high cycle fatigue regime. The predicted fatigue life matches the actual average fatigue life well. Statistical analysis shows that the predicted variances of the fatigue life are equal to those estimated from actual fatigue life.

1.
Yang, X., 2001, “A Methodology for Predicting the Variance of Fatigue Life Incorporating the Effects of Manufacturing Effects,” Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
2.
Socie, D., and Downing, S., 1997, “Statistical Strain-Life Fatigue Analysis,” Recent Development in Fatigue Technology, PT-67, R. A. Chernenkoff and J. J. Bonnen, eds., Published by SAE, pp. 383–388.
3.
Ridder, R. L., Landgraf, R. W., and Thangjitham, S., 1997, “Reliability Analysis of an Automotive Wheel Assembly,” Recent Development in Fatigue Technology, PT-67, R. A. Chernenkoff and J. J. Bonnen, eds., Published by SAE, pp. 209–219.
4.
Thangjitham, S., and Landgraf, R. W., 1997, “Probability-Based Methods for Fatigue Analysis,” Recent Development in Fatigue Technology, PT-67, R. A. Chernenkoff and J. J. Bonnen, eds., Published by SAE, pp. 81–85.
5.
Rice, R. C. (Ed.), Leise, B. N., and Nelson, D. V. (Associate Ed.), 1988, Fatigue Design Handbook, Society of Automotive Engineers.
6.
Moshier
,
M. A.
, and
Hillberry
,
B. M.
,
1999
, “
Inclusion of Compressive Residual Stress Effects in Crack Growth Modelling
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
22
, pp.
519
526
.
7.
Cathey
,
W. H.
, and
Grandt
,
A. F.
,
1980
, “
Fracture Mechanics Consideration of Residual Stresses Introduced by Coldworking Fastener Holes
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
,
102
, January, pp.
85
91
.
8.
Koster, W. P., Field, M., Fritz, L. J., Gatto, L. R., and Kahles, J. F., 1970, “Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components,” Technical Report AFML-TR-70-11, MMP Project Nr. 721–8.
9.
Brinksmeier
,
E.
,
Cammett
,
J. T.
,
Konig
,
W.
,
Leskovar
,
P.
,
Peters
,
J.
, and
Tonshoff
,
H. K.
,
1982
, “
Residual Stresses-Measurement and Causes in Machining Processes,” Key-Note Papers
,
CIRP Ann.
,
31
(
2
), pp.
491
510
.
10.
Matsumoto
,
Y.
,
Magda
,
D.
,
Hoeppner
,
D. W.
, and
Kim
,
Tae Young
,
1991
, “
Effect of Machining Processes on the Fatigue Strength of Hardened AISI 4340 Steel
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
113
, pp.
154
159
.
11.
Taylor
,
D.
, and
Clancy
,
O. M.
,
1991
, “
The Fatigue Performance of Machined Surfaces
,”
Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct.
,
14
, No.
2/3
, pp.
329
336
.
12.
Koster, W. P., 1991, “Effect of Residual Stress on Fatigue Structural Alloys,” Practical Applications of Residual Stress Technology, Conference Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana, 15–17, pp. 1–9.
13.
Mittal
,
S.
, and
Liu
,
C. R.
,
1998
, “
A Method of Modeling Residual Stresses in Superfinish Hard Turning
,”
Wear
,
218
, October, pp.
21
33
.
14.
Liu
,
C. R.
, and
Mittal
,
S.
,
1998
, “
Optimal Pre-stressing the Surface of a Component by Superfinish Hard Turning for Maximum Fatigue Life in Rolling Contact
,”
Wear
,
219
, pp.
128
140
.
15.
Liu
,
C. R.
, and
Yang
,
X.
,
2001
, “
The Scatter of Surface Residual Stresses Produced by Face-Turning and Grinding
,”
Mach. Sci. Technol.
5
(
1
), pp.
1
21
.
16.
Yang, X., Liu, C. R., and Grandt, A. F., 2000, “An Experimental Study on Fatigue Life variance, Residual Stress Variance, and Their Correlation of Face-Turned and Ground Ti 6A1-4V Samples,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., to appear.
17.
Yang, X., and Liu, C. R., 2001, “The Impact of Hole Making Processes on the Variance of the Fatigue Life of the Component,” SPE Form. Eval., submitted to Machining Science and Technology, February.
18.
Bannantine, J., Comer, J., and Handrock, J., 1990, Fundamentals of Metal Fatigue Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc.
19.
Kuczek, 2001, Private Discussions with Dr. Kuczek, a Professor in Department of Statistics at Purdue University.
20.
Parratt, Lyman G., 1961, Probability and Experimental Errors in Science, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
21.
Sandstrom, Donald R., 1998, “Panel Discussion: Perspective of Aerospace Industry,” Proceedings of the CIRP International Workshop on Modeling of Machining Operations, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 75–77, May 19.
22.
ASM Committee on Titanium and Titanium Alloys, 1981, “Heat Treating of Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Metals Handbook, Vol. 4, pp. 763–744, American Society for Metals, 9th Edition.
23.
Machining Data Center, 1980, Machining Data Handbook, 3rd Edition, Machining Data Center, Cincinnati, OH.
24.
ASTM, 1999, “Standard Practice for Statistical Analysis of Linear or Linearized Stress-Life (S-N) and Strain-Life (ε-N) Fatigue Data,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 3: Metals Test Methods and Analytical Procedures, Vol. 03.01: Metals-Mechanical Testing, pp. 614–620.
25.
Johnson, R. A., 1994, Miller and Freund’s Probability and Statistics for Engineers, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
You do not currently have access to this content.