Selective assembly is a method to achieve high precision fit using low precision parts. The current practices in selective assembly lack a physical process model to guide the design and process of mating parts, consequently, selective assembly is often a nightmare for manufacturing people and historically an event to be avoided. Process capability indices (PCIs) are the widely accepted process parameters, functioning as a measure of process performance, such as process centering, process spread, process bias, etc. In this paper, the concept of PCI-based tolerance is proposed as an interface between quality requirements and statistical process control (SPC) parameters. An analytical model involving PCI-based tolerance is developed to predict and assure the matchable degree in selective assembly. A detailed case study of the fit of dry liners and cylinder blocks in a diesel engine is presented. As matchable degree and other process quality requirements can be assured at the stage of design by introducing PCI-based tolerance, the process of selective assembly can be improved significantly as an effective way to achieve precision assembly with economical manufacturing processes.

1.
Arai
T.
,
1992
, “
A Simulation System on Assembly Accuracy
,”
Annals of the CIRP
, Vol.
41
, No.
1
, pp.
37
40
.
2.
Boyer, D. E., and Nazemetz, J. W., 1985, “Introducing Statistical Selective Assembly—A Means of Producing High Precision Assemblies From Low Precision Components,” Annual International Industrial Engineering Conference, Institute of Industrial Engineers, USA, pp. 562–570.
3.
Boyles
R. A.
,
1991
, “
The Taguchi Capability Index
,”
J. of Quality Technology
, Vol.
23
, pp.
17
26
.
4.
Chan
L. K.
,
Cheng
S. W.
, and
Spring
F. A.
,
1989
, “
A New Measure of Process Capability: Cpm
,”
J. of Quality Technology
, Vol.
20
, pp.
162
175
.
5.
Conway, H. G., 1962, Engineering Tolerances, London, Sir Isaac Pitman & Son Ltd.
6.
Fang
X. D.
, and
Zhang
Y.
,
1995
, “
A New Algorithm for Minimizing the Surplus Parts in Selective Assembly
,”
Computer & Industrial Engineering
, Vol.
28
, No.
2
, pp.
341
350
.
7.
Fang
X. D.
, and
Zhang
Y.
,
1996
, “
Assuring the Matchable Degree in Selective Assembly via a Predictive and Probability Method
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
, Vol.
118
, pp.
252
258
.
8.
Kreyszig, E., 1970, Introductory Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & sons, New York.
9.
Kalpakjian, S., 1992, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
10.
Kane
V. E.
,
1986
, “
Process Capability Indices
,”
Journal of Quality Technology
, Vol.
18
, No.
1
, pp.
41
45
.
11.
Kulkarni, S. V., and Garg, T. K., 1985, “Optimal Allocation of Tolerances in Engineering Designs Governed by Systems of Simultaneous Tolerance Equations using Selective Assembly,” Journal of Inst. Eng. India, Part ME 5-65, pp. 160–168.
12.
Sarkadi and Vincze, I., 1974, Mathematical Methods of Statistical Quality Control, Academic Press, New York.
13.
Lilly, L. C. R., 1984, Diesel Engine Reference Book, Butterworths, London.
14.
Pugh
G. A.
,
1986
, “
Partitioning for Selective Assembly
,”
Computer & Industrial Engineering
, Vol.
11
, Nos.
1–4
, pp.
175
179
.
15.
Pugh
G. A.
,
1992
, “
Selective Assembly with Components of Dissimilar Variance
,”
Computer & Industrial Engineering
, Vol.
23
, Nos.
1–4
, pp.
487
491
.
16.
Srinivasan, V., and O’Connor, Michael A., 1995, “Towards an ISO Standard for Statistical Tolerancing,” Computer-Aided Tolerancing, F. Kimura, ed., Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 159–171.
17.
Wakefield, L. P., 1964, Dimensioning for Interchangeability, Pergamon Press LTD.
18.
o̸yvind, Bjo̸rk, 1989, Computer-Aided Tolerancing, ASME Press, New York, pp. 79–82.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.