Point Laser Triangulation (PLT) probes are relatively new noncontact probes being integrated with Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMMs). Two prominent advantages of PLT probes are fast measuring speeds (typically 100 to 1000 times faster than touch probes) and no contact force is required to take measurements making soft or fragile objects measurable. These advantages have motivated the integration of PLT probes onto CMM. However, because the PLT probe is an electro-optics device, many factors related to optics affect its operation, such as sensor-to-surface orientation and surface reflectivity. To study and better understand these error sources, PLT probe models are needed to simulate observed measurement errors. This article presents a new PLT probe model, which simulates observed measurement errors and shows the effects of placement and orientation of internal components. This PLT probe model is a combination of internal component models developed using geometrical optics. The model successfully simulates measurement errors from specular reflection observed experimentally with real PLT probes. The model also allows the parameters of internal components to be studied.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Lasers, Probes, Simulation, Errors, Coordinate measuring machines, Electro-optics, Geometric optics, Optics, Reflectance, Reflection, Sensors
1.
Phillips, S., “Proposed Axial Sensitivity Test,” Prepared by the ASME B89.4.14 Working Group: Non-Contact Probes, Mar 1994.
2.
Garces, A., Hu¨ser, D., Pfeifer, T., Scharsich, P., Torres, F., and Trapet, E., “Performance Test Procedures for Optical Coordinate Measuring Probes—Final Project Report, Part 2—Proposal of User Performed Test Procedures,” Tech. Rep. EUR 15315 EN, BCR, Luxembourg, 1994.
3.
Garces, A., Hu¨ser, D., Pfeifer, T., Scharsich, P., Torres, F., and Trapet, E., “Performance Test Procedures for Optical Coordinate Measuring Probes—Final Project Report, Part 1,” Tech. Rep. EUR 15314 EN, BCR, Luxembourg, 1994.
4.
J. T., Luxon, and D. E. Parker, Industrial Lasers and Their Applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1985.
5.
Ji
Z.
, and
Leu
M. C.
, “
Design of Optical Triangulation Devices
,”
Optics and Laser Technology
, Vol.
21
, No.
5
, pp.
335
–
338
,
1989
.
6.
Nayar
S. K.
,
Ikeuchi
K.
, and
Kanade
T.
, “
Surface Reflection: Physical and Geometrical Perspectives
,”
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
, Vol.
13
, No.
7
, pp.
611
–
634
,
1991
.
7.
Torrance
K. E.
, and
Sparrow
E. M.
, “
Theory for Off-specular Reflection from Roughened Surfaces
,”
Journal of The Optical Society of America
, Vol.
57
, No.
9
, pp.
1105
–
1114
,
1967
.
8.
Wolfe, W. L., “Theories of Surface Scattering,” Tech. Rep., Optical Systems and Engineering Short Courses, Inc., Tucson, Arizona, May 1989.
9.
Puskar, R. J., “The Opposition Effect in Optical Scattering from Rough Surfaces,” PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, 1983.
10.
Wolf, P. R., Elements of Photogrammetry: With Air Photo Interpretation and Remote Sensing., McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1983.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.