Abstract

For gas turbines (GTs) with free power turbines (FPTs), the capacity or flow parameter matching is of prime importance. Accurately matched capacity enables the GT to run at its optimum condition. This ensures maximum component efficiencies and optimum shaft speeds within mechanical limits. This paper presents the challenges, uncertainties, and opportunities associated with an accurate matching of a generic two-shaft aeroderivative high pressure (HP)-low pressure (LP) gas generator with the FPT. Additionally, generic performance trends, uncertainty quantification, and results from the verification program are also discussed. These results are necessary to ensure that the final FPT capacity is within the allowable range, and hence, the product meets the performance guarantees. The sensitivity of FPT capacity to various design variables such as the vane throat area, vane trailing edge size, and manufacturing tolerance is presented. In addition, issues that may arise due to not meeting the target capacity are also discussed. To conclude, in addition to design, analysis, and statistical studies, a system-of-systems approach is mandatory to meet the allowed variation in the FPT capacity and hence the desired GT performance.

References

1.
Walsh
,
P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
,
1998
,
Gas Turbine Performance
, 2nd Edition, Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford,
UK
.
2.
Kurz
,
R.
, and
Brun
,
K.
,
2002
, “
Gas Turbine Performance—What Makes the Map?
,”
29th Turbomachinery Symposium Conference
, Houston, TX, Sept. 18–21, pp.
247
262
.https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/303f/ecc6b1fe93dcb2bea542507ad512b2eb051f.pdf
3.
Haq
,
I. U.
,
2005
, “
A Generalized Procedure to Estimate Matching of Power Turbine With Aeroderivative Gas Generator at High Speed Settings
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2005-68015. 10.1115/GT2005-68015
4.
Chew
,
J.
, and
Hills
,
N.
,
2007
, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics for Turbomachinery Internal Air Systems
,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A
,
365
(
1859
), pp.
2587
2611
.10.1098/rsta.2007.2022
5.
Smith
,
S.
,
1965
, “
A Simple Correlation of Turbine Efficiency
,”
Aeronaut. J.
,
69
(
655
), pp.
467
470
.10.1017/S0001924000059108
6.
Thirumurthy
,
D.
, and
Ruggiero
,
B
,
2019
, “
Optimized SGT-A35 GT61 for Improved Emissions and Enhanced Efficiency Across the Load Range
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2019-90610. 10.1115/GT2019-90610
7.
Mattingly
,
J.
,
1996
,
Elements of Gas Turbine Propulsion
,
McGraw-Hill Science
, New Delhi, India.
8.
Pellegrini
,
A.
,
Nikolaidis
,
T.
,
Pachidis
,
V.
, and
Kohler
,
S.
,
2017
, “
On the Performance Simulation of Inter-Stage Turbine Reheat
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
113
, pp.
544
553
.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.034
9.
Tsoutsanis
,
E.
, and
Meskin
,
N.
,
2019
, “
Dynamic Performance Simulation and Control of Gas Turbines for Hybrid Gas/Wind Energy Applications
,”
Appl. Therm. Eng.
,
147
, pp.
122
142
.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.09.031
10.
Wilson
,
J.
,
Lindenfeld
,
W.
,
Vendler
,
K.
,
Todman
,
M. T.
,
Whinray
,
B.
, and
Muddiman
,
J. W.
,
1998
, “
A New High Efficiency Gas Turbine for Mechanical Drives
,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-535. 10.1115/98-GT-535
11.
Suraweera
,
J. K.
,
2011
, “
Off-Design Performance Prediction of Gas Turbines Without the Use of Compressor or Turbine Characteristics
,” M. Sc. thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
12.
Tipton
,
L.
,
2004
, “
Bearing Load Measurements on a 3-Shaft Gas Turbine
,”
Appl. Mech. Mat.
,
1–2
, pp.
225
232
.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.1-2.225
13.
Milli
,
A.
, and
Shahpar
,
S.
, “
PADRAM: Parametric Design and Rapid Meshing System for Complex Turbomachinery Configurations
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2012-69030. 10.1115/GT2012-69030
14.
Lapworth
,
B. L.
,
2004
, “
HYDRA-CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development
,”
International Conference on Scientific and Engineering Computation
(
IC-SEC
),
Singapore
,
July
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316171819_HYDRA-CFD_A_Framework_for_Collaborative_CFD_Development
15.
Spalart
,
P.
, and
Allmaras
,
S.
,
1992
, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,”
30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit
, Reno, NV, Jan.10.2514/6.1992-439
16.
Menter
,
F.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.10.2514/3.12149
17.
Langtry
,
R. B.
, and
Menter
,
F. R.
,
2009
, “
Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes
,”
AIAA J.
,
47
(
12
), pp.
2894
2906
.10.2514/1.42362
18.
The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
2014
, “
Gas Turbines—Performance Test Codes
,” The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Washington, DC, Standard No. PTC-22.
You do not currently have access to this content.