Abstract

The installed flow field for a variable pitch fan (VPF) operating in reverse thrust for the complete aircraft landing run is described in this paper. To do this, a VPF design to generate reverse thrust by reversing airflow direction is developed for a representative 40,000 lbf modern high bypass ratio engine. Thereafter, to represent the actual flow conditions that the VPF would face, an engine model that includes the nacelle, core inlet splitter, outlet guide vanes, bypass nozzle, core exhaust duct, aft-body plug, and core nozzle is designed. The engine model with the VPF is attached to a representative airframe in landing configuration to include the effects of installation. A rolling ground plane that mimics the runway during the landing run is also included to complete the model definition. Three-dimensional (3D) Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solutions are carried out for two different VPF stagger angle settings and rotational speeds to obtain the fan flow field. The dynamic installed VPF flow field is characterized by the interaction of the freestream and the reverse stream flows. The two streams meet in a shear layer in the fan passages and get deflected radially outward before turning back onto themselves. The flow field changes with stagger setting, fan rotational speed, and the aircraft landing speed because of the consequent changes in the momentum of the two streams. The description of the installed VPF flow field as generated in this study is necessary to (a) qualify VPF designs that are typically designed by considering only the uninstalled static flow field and (b) choose the VPF operating setting for different stages of the aircraft landing run.

References

1.
Mazzawy
,
R. S.
,
2010
, “
Performance Study for the Benefits of a Variable Pitch Composite Fan
,”
ASME Paper No. GT2010-22148
.
2.
Krishnan
,
G.
,
Perullo
,
C.
, and
Mavris
,
D. N.
,
2013
, “
An Assessment of Relative Technology Benefits of a Variable Pitch Fan and Variable Area Nozzle
,”
AIAA
Paper No.
2013
3604
.10.2514/6.2013-3604
3.
Denning
,
R. M.
,
1972
, “
Variable Pitch Ducted Fans for STOL Transport Aircraft
,”
ASME
Paper No. 72-GT-61.10.1115/72-GT-61
4.
Halliwell
,
I.
, and
Justice
,
K.
,
2012
, “
Fuel Burn Benefits of a Variable-Pitch Geared Fan Engine
,”
AIAA
Paper No.
2012
3912
.10.2514/6.2012-3912
5.
Violette
,
J. A.
, and
Loos
,
E. S.
,
2010
, “
Mechanical Design of a Variable Pitch Fan for Turbofan Engines
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2010-22969
.10.1115/GT2010-22969
6.
McKay
,
B.
, and
Barlow
,
A.
,
2012
, “
The UltraFan Engine and Aircraft Based Thrust Reversing
,”
AIAA
Paper No.
2012
3919
.10.2514/6.2012-3919
7.
Moore
,
R. D.
, and
Osborn
,
W. M.
,
1979
, “
Aerodynamic Performance of 1.38-Pressure-Ratio, Variable-Pitch Fan Stage
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA TP 1502.
8.
Moore
,
R. D.
, and
Kovich
,
G.
,
1976
, “
Aerodynamic Performance of Two Variable-Pitch Fan Stages
,” NASA, Washington, DC, June 13–17, Report No. NASA TM X-73416.
9.
Samanich
,
N. E.
,
Reemsnyder
,
D. C.
, and
Bloomer
,
H. E.
,
1980
, “
Reverse Thrust Performance of the QCSEE Variable Pitch Turbofan Engine
,” SAE Trans., 89, pp.
3623
3650
, available at www.jstor.org/stable/44632622
10.
Schaefer
,
J. W.
,
Sagerser
,
D. R.
, and
Stakolich
,
E. G.
,
1977
, “
Dynamics of High-Bypass-Engine Thrust Reversal Using a Variable-Pitch Fan
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA TM X-3524.
11.
Reemsnyderj
,
D. C.
, and
Sagerser
,
D. A.
,
1979
, “
Reverse Thrust Performance of a Variable-Pitch Fan Engine at Forward Velocity
,”
J. Aircr.
,
16
(
12
), pp.
848
855
.10.2514/3.58612
12.
Jeracki
,
R. J.
,
2006
, “
Comprehensive Report of Fan Performance From Duct Rake Instrumentation on 1.294 Pressure Ratio, 806 ft/Sec Tip Speed Turbofan Simulator Models
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA/TM-2006-213863.
13.
Hobbs
,
D. E.
,
Neubert
,
R. J.
,
Malmborg
,
E. W.
,
Philbrick
,
D. H.
, and
Spear
,
D. A.
,
1995
, “
Low Noise Research Fan Stage Design
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA-CR-195382.
14.
Tweedt
,
D. L.
,
2014
, “
Computational Aerodynamic Simulations of an 840 ft/Sec Tip Speed Advanced Ducted Propulsor Fan System Model for Acoustic Methods Assessment and Development
,” NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA/CR-2014-218129.
15.
Williams
,
T. S.
, and
Hall
,
C. A.
,
2018
, “
Reverse Thrust Aerodynamics of Variable Pitch Fans
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2018-75739
10.1115/GT2018-75739
16.
Palmer
,
J. R.
, and
Pachidis
,
V.
,
1990
,
The TURBOMATCH Scheme for Aero/Industrial Gas Turbine Engine Design Point/Off Design Performance Calculation
,
SME, Thermal Power Group, Cranfield University, UK
.
17.
Mourouzidis
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Cycle Optimisation & Preliminary Design of Very Low Specific Thrust Turbofan Engines
,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, UK.
18.
Lolis
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Development of a Preliminary Weight Estimation Method for Advanced Turbofan Engines
,” Ph.D. thesis, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, UK.
19.
Lolis
,
P.
,
Giannakakis
,
P.
,
Sethi
,
V.
,
Jackson
,
A. J. B.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
,
2014
, “
Evaluation of Aero Gas Turbine Preliminary Weight Estimation Methods
,”
Aeronaut. J.
,
118
(
1204
), pp.
625
641
.10.1017/S0001924000009404
20.
Templalexis
,
I.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
,
Pachidis
,
V.
, and
Kotsiopoulos
,
P.
,
2006
, “
Quasi-Three-Dimensional Compressor Performance Simulation Using Streamline Curvature and Multi-Parallel Compressor Theory
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90812.
10.1115/GT2006-90812
21.
Rumsey
,
C. L.
, and
Slotnick
,
J. P.
,
2014
, “
Overview and Summary of the Second AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop
,”
52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
National Harbor, Maryland
Jan. 13-17
, p.
0747
.
22.
AIAA
,
2013
, “
The 2nd AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop (HiLiftPW-2)
,” LARC NASA, San Diego, CA, accessed Mar. 15, 2018, https://hiliftpw.larc.nasa.gov/index-workshop2.html
23.
Blasco
,
D. C.
,
2017
, “
3D-CFD Model Design and Integration of a Variable Pitch Fan Engine
,” M.Sc. thesis, School of Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University, UK.
24.
Goulos
,
I.
,
Giangaspero
,
G.
, and
MacManus
,
D.
,
2017
, “
GEMINI v2.0 User-Guide
,” Rolls Royce UTC, UK.
25.
Stankowski
,
T. P.
,
MacManus
,
D. G.
,
Sheaf
,
C. T.
, and
Grech
,
N.
,
2016
, “
Aerodynamic Interference for Aero-Engine Installations
,”
AIAA Paper No. 2016-0766
.
You do not currently have access to this content.