Gas turbine engines are generally optimized to operate at nearly a fixed speed with fixed blade geometries for the design operating condition. When the operating condition of the engine changes, the flow incidence angles may not be optimum with the blade geometry resulting in reduced off-design performance. Articulating the pitch angle of turbine blades in coordination with adjustable nozzle vanes can improve performance by maintaining flow incidence angles within the optimum range at all operating conditions of a gas turbine engine. Maintaining flow incidence angles within the optimum range can prevent the likelihood of flow separation in the blade passage and also reduce the thermal stresses developed due to aerothermal loads for variable speed gas turbine engine applications. U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) has partnered with University of California San Diego and Iowa State University Collaborators to conduct high fidelity stator–rotor interaction analysis for evaluating the aerodynamic efficiency benefits of articulating turbine blade concept. The flow patterns are compared between the baseline fixed geometry blades and articulating conceptual blades. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies were performed using a stabilized finite element method developed by the Iowa State University and University of California San Diego researchers. The results from the simulations together with viable smart material-based technologies for turbine blade actuations are presented in this paper.

References

1.
Welch
,
G. E.
,
Giel
,
P. W.
,
Ameri
,
A. A.
,
To
,
W.
,
Skoch
,
G. J.
, and
Thurman
,
D. R.
,
2012
, “
Variable-Speed Power Turbine Research at Glenn Research Center
,”
AHS International 68th Annual Forum
, Fort Worth, TX, May 1–3.
2.
D'Angelo
,
M.
,
1995
, “
Wide Speed Range Turboshaft Study
,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No.
NASA-CR-198380
.
3.
Welch
,
G. E.
,
2010
, “
Assessment of Aerodynamic Challenges of a Variable-Speed Power Turbine for Large Civil Tilt-Rotor Application
,”
AHS International 66th Annual Forum
, Phoenix, AZ, May 11–13.
4.
Cumpsty
,
N.
,
2003
,
Jet Propulsion: A Simple Guide to Aerodynamic and Thermodynamic Design and Performance of Jet Engines
, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.
5.
Karpelson
,
M.
,
Wei
,
G.
,
Wood
,
R.
,
2008
, “
A Review of Actuation and Power Electronics Options for Flapping-Wing Robotic Insects
,”
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
(
ICRA 2008
), Pasadena, CA, May 19–23, pp.
779
786
.
6.
Murugan
,
M.
,
Booth
,
D.
,
Ghoshal
,
A.
,
Thurman
,
D.
, and
Kerner
,
K.
,
2015
, “
Concept Study for Adaptive Gas Turbine Rotor Blade
,”
Int. J. Eng. Sci.
(
IJES
),
4
(
9
), pp.
10
17
.
7.
Padula
,
S.
,
Bigelow
,
G.
,
Noebe
,
R.
,
Gaydosh
,
D.
, and
Garg
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Challenges and Progress in the Development of High-Temperature Shape Memory Alloys Based on NiTiX Compositions for High-Force Actuator Applications
,”
International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies
(
SMST-2006
), Pacific Grove, CA, May 7–11, Paper No. 20110001638.
8.
Cohen
,
H.
,
Rogers
,
G. F. C.
, and
Saravanamuttoo
,
H. I. H.
,
1972
,
Gas Turbine Theory
, 2nd ed.,
Longman Group.
, Essex, UK.
9.
Hsu
,
M.-C.
,
Wang
,
C.
,
Herrema
,
A. J.
,
Schillinger
,
D.
,
Ghoshal
,
A.
, and
Bazilevs
,
Y.
,
2015
, “
An Interactive Geometry Modeling and Parametric Design Platform for Isogeometric Analysis
,”
Comput. Math. Appl.
,
70
(
7
), pp.
1481
1500
.
10.
McNeel North America,
2015
, “
Rhinoceros
,” Robert McNeel & Associates, Seattle, WA, accessed Jan. 27, 2015, http://www.rhino3d.com/
11.
Davidson, S.,
2015
, “
Grasshopper
,” S. Davidson, Lynnwood, WA, accessed Feb. 3, 2015, http://www.grasshopper3d.com/
12.
Brooks
,
A. N.
, and
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
,
1982
, “
Streamline Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin Formulations for Convection Dominated Flows With Particular Emphasis on the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
32
(
1–3
), pp.
199
259
.
13.
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
,
Liu
,
W. K.
, and
Zimmermann
,
T. K.
,
1981
, “
Lagrangian-Eulerian Finite Element Formulation for Incompressible Viscous Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
29
(
3
), pp.
329
349
.
14.
Hsu
,
M.-C.
, and
Bazilevs
,
Y.
,
2012
, “
Fluid–Structure Interaction Modeling of Wind Turbines: Simulating the Full Machine
,”
Comput. Mech.
,
50
(
6
), pp.
821
833
.
15.
Bazilevs
,
Y.
, and
Hughes
,
T. J. R.
,
2007
, “
Weak Imposition of Dirichlet Boundary Conditions in Fluid Mechanics
,”
Comput. Fluids
,
36
(
1
), pp.
12
26
.
16.
Boyce
,
M. P.
,
2011
,
Gas Turbine Engineering Handbook
,
Elsevier
, Oxford, UK.
You do not currently have access to this content.