Oil system architecture in aero engines has remained almost the same for the last 35 years. At least one mechanically-driven oil feed pump is responsible for distributing pressurized oil into the bearing chambers and several scavenge pumps, also mechanically driven, are responsible for evacuating the bearing chambers from the oil and air mixture. Air is used as the sealing medium in bearing chambers and is the dominant medium in terms of volume occupation and expansion phenomena. In order to simplify the oil system architecture, improve the system's reliability with less mechanical parts, and also decrease weight, an ejector system has been designed for scavenging bearing chambers. In Flouros et al. (2013, “Ejector Scavenging of Bearing Chambers. A Numerical and Experimental Investigation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(8), p. 081602), an ejector system was presented which used aviation oil (MIL-PRF-23699 Std.) as the primary medium. In the course of further development, the original design was modified leading to a much smaller ejector. This ejector was tested in the rig using alternatively pressurized air or pressurized oil as primary medium. Additionally, three in-house developed primary nozzle (jet) designs were introduced and tested. The design of an ejector for application with compressible or incompressible media was supported through the development of an analysis tool. A momentum-based efficiency function is proposed herein and enables comparisons among different operating cases. Finally, ANSYS cfx (ANSYS, 2014, “ANSYS® CFX, Release 14.0,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA) was used to carry out the numerical analysis. Similar to the ejector described in Flouros et al. (2013, “Ejector Scavenging of Bearing Chambers. A Numerical and Experimental Investigation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(8), p. 081602), the new design was also manufactured out of pure quartz glass to enable optical access. Through suitable instrumentation for pressures, temperatures, and air/oil flows, the performance characteristics of the new ejector were assessed and were compared to the analytic and numerical results. This work was partly funded by the German government within the research program Lufo4 (Luftfahrtforschungsprogramm 4/Aeronautical Research Program 4).

References

1.
Flouros
,
M.
,
Cottier
,
F.
,
Hirschmann
,
M.
,
Kutz
,
J.
, and
Jocher
,
A.
,
2013
, “
Ejector Scavenging of Bearing Chambers. A Numerical and Experimental Investigation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
135
(
8
), p.
081602
.
2.
Engineering Science Data Unit (ESDU)
,
1985
, “
Ejectors and jet Pumps—Design and Performance for Incompressible Liquid Flows
,” ESDU International PLC, London, Item No.
85032
.
3.
Rotta
,
J.
,
1957
, “
Ejektorpumpen mit Extrem Hohem Durchsatzverhältnis
,”
Forsch. Geb. Ingenieurwes.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
157
167
.
4.
Engineering Science Data Unit (ESDU)
,
1984
, “
Ejectors and Jet Pumps, Design and Performance for Compressible Air Flow
,” ESDU International PLC, London, Item No. 84029.
5.
Flügel
,
G.
,
1939
,
Berechnung von Strahlapparaten
(VDI-Forschungsheft 395, Beilage zu “Forschung auf dem Gebiete des Ingenieurwesens”),
Ausgabe B
, Bd. 10, Hannover, Germany.
6.
Levy
,
S.
,
1999
,
Two-Phase Flow in Complex Systems
,
Wiley
,
Toronto, ON
, pp.
90
107
.
7.
Storek
,
H.
, and
Brauer
,
H.
,
1980
,
Reibungsdruckverlust der Adiabaten Gas/Fluessigkeitstroemung in Horizontalen und Vertikalen Rohren
(VDI Forschungsheft, Vol.
599
),
VDI Verlag
,
Duesseldorf, Germany
, pp.
8
9
.
8.
Collier
,
J. G.
, and
Thome
,
J. R.
,
2001
,
Convective Boiling and Condensation
, 3rd ed.,
Oxford University Press
, Oxford, UK, p.
44
.
9.
Tye
,
R. P.
,
1969
,
Thermal Conductivity
, Vol.
1
,
Academic Press
,
New York
, p.
319
.
10.
Taitel
,
Y.
, and
Dukler
,
A. E.
,
1976
, “
A Model for Predicting Flow Regime Transitions in Horizontal and Near Horizontal Gas-Liquid Flow
,”
AIChE J.
,
22
(
1
), pp.
47
55
.
11.
ANSYS
,
2014
, “
ANSYS® CFX, Release 14.0
,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
12.
ANSYS
,
2014
, “
ANSYS® ICEM CFD Mesh Editor, Release 13.0
,” ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA.
13.
Jocher
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Auslegung und Fluidmechanische Untersuchung Eines Zwei- Phasen-Ejektors Fuer Flugtriebwerke
” Diploma Thesis (Design and Fluid Mechanical Investigation of a Two-Phase Flow Ejector for Aero Engines), Lehrstuhl Fuer Thermodynamik (Department of Thermo-Dynamics), Munich Technical University, Munich, Germany.
14.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
1994
, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
15.
Schiller
,
L.
, and
Naumann
,
Z.
,
1935
, “
A Drag Coefficient Correlation
,”
Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing.
,
77
, pp.
318
320
.
16.
Sato
,
Y.
,
1975
, “
Liquid Velocity Distribution in Two-Phase Bubble Flow
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
2
(
1
), pp.
79
95
.
17.
Flouros
,
M.
,
Iatrou
,
G.
,
Yakinthos
,
K.
,
Cottier
,
F.
, and
Hirschmann
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Two Phase Flow Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Horizontal Scavenge Pipes in an Aero Engine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
8
), p.
081901
.
18.
Engineering Science Data Unit (ESDU)
, 1973, “
Performance of Conical Diffusers in Incompressible Flow
,” ESDU International PLC, London, Item No.
73024
.
You do not currently have access to this content.