It is widely recognized that the fuel-air mixing process is a critical factor in improving combustion efficiency and in minimizing pollutants such as NOx. Enhancement of fuel-air mixing can lead to lower pollutant emissions and greater efficiency. However, swirling flows in lean combustors play the role of fuel-air mixing and flame stability. The complex fluid dynamic phenomena encountered in swirling two-phase flow contribute to the difficulty in complete understanding of the different processes occurring in combustors. Fortunately, optical and laser-based visualization techniques available in our lab are important nonintrusive tools for visualizing flow process, especially for fuel injection and fuel-air mixing. To provide for a better understanding of effects of counter-rotating flow on droplets in atomization process, this study is a detailed characterization of the spray generated by an airblast atomizer by planar laser sheet imaging method. Optical facility for spray diagnostics with fuel planar laser induced fluorescence (fuel-PLIF) method for fuel distribution and particle image velocimetry (PIV) method for the velocity of droplets is used to evaluate the performance of an airblast atomizer. The results show that the performance of secondary atomization is influenced by swirling flow and primary atomization simultaneously; the swirling flow exhibits significant influence on the droplet size and space distribution relative to that of primary atomization. The primary swirling air reopens the spray cone generated by pressure-swirl atomizer, and the secondary swirling air affects the fuel distribution by forming the recirculation zone. The results provide critical information for the design and development of combustion chambers.

References

1.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1983
, “
Fuel Effects on Gas Turbine Combustion
,” Report No. AFWAL-TR-83-2004.
2.
Orain
,
M.
,
Grisch
,
F.
,
Jourdanneau
,
E.
,
Rossow
,
B.
,
Guin
,
C.
, and
Tretout
,
B.
,
2009
, “
Simultaneous Measurements of Equivalence Ratio and Flame Structure in Multipoint Injector Using PLIF
,”
C. R. Mec.
,
337
, pp.
373
384
.10.1016/j.crme.2009.06.019
3.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1999
,
Gas Turbine Combustion
, 2nd ed.,
Taylor and Francis
,
London
.
4.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1989
,
Atomization and Sprays
,
Taylor and Francis
,
London
.
5.
Rizk
,
N. K.
,
2004
, “
Fuel Atomization Effects on Combustor Performance
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-3540. 10.2514/6.2004-3540
6.
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
1995
, “
The Role of Fuel Preparation in Low-Emission Combustion
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
617
654
.10.1115/1.2815449
7.
Lazik
,
W.
,
Doerr
,
Th.
,
Bake
,
S.
,
Bank
,
R. V. D.
, and
Rackwitz
,
L.
,
2008
, “
Development of Lean-Burn Low-NOx Combustion Technology at Rolls-Royce Deutschland
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Berlin, Germany
, June 9–13,
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51115. 10.1115/GT2008-51115
8.
Mongia
H. C.
,
2003
, “
TAPS—A 4th Generation Propulsion Combustor Technology for LowEmissions
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-2657. 10.2514/6.2003-2657
9.
Manampathy
,
G.
,
Giridhara
,
G.
,
Mongia
,
H. C.
, and
Jeng
,
S. M.
,
2003
, “
Swirl Cup Modeling—Part VIII: Spray Combustion in CFM-56 Single Cup Flame Tube
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-0319. 10.2514/6.2003-0319
10.
Wang
,
H. Y.
,
McDonell
,
V. G.
, and
Samuelsen
,
S.
,
1995
, “
Influence of Hardware Design on the Flow Field Structures and the Patterns of Droplet Dispersion: Part I—Mean Quantities
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
282
289
.10.1115/1.2814092
11.
Fu
,
Y. Q.
,
Cai
,
J.
,
Jeng
,
S. M.
, and
Mongia
,
H. C.
,
2007
, “
Characteristics of the Swirling Flow Generated by a Counter-Rotating Swirler
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2007-5690. 10.2514/6.2007-5690
12.
Mehta
,
J. M.
,
Hyoun-Woo
,
S.
, and
Wisler
,
D. C.
,
2009
, “
Mean Velocity and Turbulent Flow Field Characteristics Inside an Advanced Combustor Swirl Cup
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 89-0215. 10.2514/6.89-0215
13.
Colby
,
J. A.
,
Menon
,
S.
, and
Jagoda
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Spray and Emission Characteristics Near Lean Blowout in a Counter-Swirl Stabilized Gas Turbine Combustor
,”
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
,
Barcelona, Spain
, May 8–11,
ASME
Paper No. GT2006-90974. 10.1115/GT2006-90974
14.
Becker
,
J.
, and
Hassa
,
C.
,
2004
, “
Experimental Investigation of Spatial and Temporal Aspects of the Liquid Fuel Placement in a Swirl Cup at Elevated Pressure
,”
Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo
, Vienna, Austria, June 14–17,
ASME
Paper No. GT2004-53524. 10.1115/GT2004-53524
15.
Kenneth
,
K. K.
,
1996
,
Recent Advances in Spray Combustion: Spray Combustion Measurements and Model Simulation Volume II
(
Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics
, Vol.
171
),
AIAA, Reston, VA
.
16.
Bachalo
,
W. D.
,
2010
, “
Spray Characterization: A Critical Review
,”
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS-Europe 2010
),
Brno, Czech Republic, September 6–8
.
17.
Bachalo
,
W. D.
,
2000
, “
Spray Diagnostics for the Twenty-First Century
,”
Atomization Sprays
,
10
, pp.
439
474
.
18.
Baranger
,
P.
,
Orain
,
M.
, and
Grisch
,
F.
,
2005
, “
Fluorescence Spectroscopy of Kerosene Vapour: Application to Gas Turbines
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2005-828. 10.2514/6.2005-828
You do not currently have access to this content.