“Dynamic pressure loss” is often used to describe the added loss associated with the time varying components of an unsteady flow through a piping system in centrifugal and reciprocating compressor stations. Conventionally, dynamic pressure losses are determined by assuming a periodically pulsating 1D flow profile and calculating the transient pipe friction losses by multiplying a friction factor by the average flow dynamic pressure component. In reality, the dynamic pressure loss is more complex and is not a single component but consists of several different physical effects, which are affected by the piping arrangement, structural supports, piping diameter, and the level of unsteadiness in the flow stream. The pressure losses due to fluid-structure interactions represent one of these physical loss mechanisms and are presently the most misrepresented loss term. The dynamic pressure losses, dominated at times by the fluid-structure interactions, have not been previously quantified for transient flows in compressor piping systems. A number of experiments were performed by Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) utilizing an instrumented piping system in a compressor closed-loop facility to determine this loss component. Steady and dynamic pressure transducers and on-pipe accelerometers were utilized to study the dynamic pressure loss. This paper describes the findings from reciprocating compressor experiments and the various fluid modeling studies undertaken for the same piping system. The objective of the research was to quantitatively assess the individual pressure loss components, which contribute to dynamic pressure (nonsteady) loss based on their physical basis as described by the momentum equation. Results from these experiments were compared with steady-state and dynamic pressure loss predictions from 1D and 3D fluid models (utilizing both steady and transient flow conditions to quantify the associated loss terms). Comparisons between the fluid model predictions and experiments revealed that pressure losses associated with the piping fluid-structure interactions can be significant and may be unaccounted for by advanced 3D fluid models. These fluid-to-structure losses should not be ignored when predicting dynamic pressure loss. The results also indicated the ability of an advanced 1D Navier–Stokes solution at predicting inertial momentum losses. Correspondingly, the three-dimensional fluid models were able to capture boundary layer losses affected by 3D geometries.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: kbrun@swri.org
e-mail: marybeth.nored@swri.org
e-mail: dennis.tweten@swri.org
e-mail: kurz_rainer_x@solarturbines.com
Article navigation
August 2011
Research Papers
Transient Pressure Loss in Compressor Station Piping Systems
Klaus Brun,
Klaus Brun
Mechanical Engineering Division,
e-mail: kbrun@swri.org
Southwest Research Institute
, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510
Search for other works by this author on:
Marybeth Nored,
Marybeth Nored
Mechanical Engineering Division,
e-mail: marybeth.nored@swri.org
Southwest Research Institute
, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238
Search for other works by this author on:
Dennis Tweten,
Dennis Tweten
Mechanical Engineering Division,
e-mail: dennis.tweten@swri.org
Southwest Research Institute
, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238
Search for other works by this author on:
Rainer Kurz
e-mail: kurz_rainer_x@solarturbines.com
Rainer Kurz
Solar Turbines, Inc.
, 9330 Sky Park Court, San Diego, CA 92123
Search for other works by this author on:
Klaus Brun
Mechanical Engineering Division,
Southwest Research Institute
, P.O. Drawer 28510, San Antonio, TX 78228-0510e-mail: kbrun@swri.org
Marybeth Nored
Mechanical Engineering Division,
Southwest Research Institute
, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238e-mail: marybeth.nored@swri.org
Dennis Tweten
Mechanical Engineering Division,
Southwest Research Institute
, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78238e-mail: dennis.tweten@swri.org
Rainer Kurz
Solar Turbines, Inc.
, 9330 Sky Park Court, San Diego, CA 92123e-mail: kurz_rainer_x@solarturbines.com
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Aug 2011, 133(8): 082401 (9 pages)
Published Online: April 7, 2011
Article history
Received:
May 20, 2010
Revised:
May 21, 2010
Online:
April 7, 2011
Published:
April 7, 2011
Citation
Brun, K., Nored, M., Tweten, D., and Kurz, R. (April 7, 2011). "Transient Pressure Loss in Compressor Station Piping Systems." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. August 2011; 133(8): 082401. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4002680
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Heat Release Characteristics of a Volatile, Oxygenated, and Reactive Fuel in a Direct Injection Engine
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Comprehensive Life Cycle Analysis of Diverse Hydrogen Production Routes and Application on a Hydrogen Engine
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
Simulation of Structural Deformations of Flexible Piping Systems by Acoustic Excitation
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2007)
The Impact of Viscous Effects on the Aerodynamic Damping of Vibrating Transonic Compressor Blades—A Numerical Study
J. Turbomach (April,2001)
Analysis of the Effects of Pulsations on the Operational Stability of Centrifugal Compressors in Mixed Reciprocating and Centrifugal Compressor Stations
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (July,2010)
Three-Dimensional Separations in Axial Compressors
J. Turbomach (April,2005)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Pulsation and Vibration Analysis of Compression and Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach, Second Edition
Pulsation and Vibration Analysis of Compression and Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression System: A Practical Approach, Third Edition
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach