Brush seals effectively control leakage in air breathing engines, albeit only applied for relatively low-pressure differentials. Hybrid brush seals (HBS) are an alternative to resolve poor reliability resulting from bristle tip wear while also allowing for reverse shaft rotation operations. A HBS incorporates pads contacting the shaft on assembly; and which under rotor spinning, lift off due to the generation of a hydrodynamic pressure. The ensuing gas film prevents intermittent contact, reducing wear, and thermal distortions. This paper presents rotordynamic measurements conducted on a test rig for evaluation of HBS technology. Single frequency shaker loads are exerted on a test rotor holding a hybrid brush seal, and measurements of rotor displacements follow for operating conditions with increasing gas supply pressures and two rotor speeds. A frequency domain identification method delivers the test system stiffness and damping coefficients. The HBS stiffness coefficients are not affected by rotor speed though the seal viscous damping shows a strong frequency dependency. The identified HBS direct stiffness decreases 15% as the supply/discharge pressure increases Pr=1.72.4. The HBS cross-coupled stiffnesses are insignificant, at least one order of magnitude smaller than the direct stiffnesses. A structural loss factor (γ) and dry-friction coefficient (μ) represent the energy dissipated in a HBS by the bristle-to-bristle and bristle-to-pad interactions. Predictions of HBS stiffness and damping coefficients correlate well with the test derived parameters. Both model predictions and test results show the dramatic reduction in the seal equivalent viscous damping coefficients as the excitation whirl frequency increases.

1.
Proctor
,
M. E.
, and
Delgado
,
I. R.
, 2004, “
Leakage and Power Loss Tests Results for Competing Turbine Engine Seals
,”
NASA
Report No. TM-2004-213049.
2.
Chupp
,
R. E.
,
Hendricks
,
R. C.
,
Lattime
,
S. B.
, and
Steinetz
,
B. M.
, 2006, “
Sealing in Turbomachinery
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
22
(
2
), pp.
313
349
.
3.
Childs
,
D.
, 1993,
Turbomachinery Rotordynamics
,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chap. 5.
4.
Childs
,
D.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
, 1997, “
Annular Gas Seals and Rotordynamics of Compressors and Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 26th Turbomachinery Symposium
, Houston, TX, pp.
201
220
.
5.
Dogu
,
Y.
, and
Aksit
,
M. F.
, 2006, “
Brush Seal Temperature Distribution Analysis
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
128
(
3
), pp.
599
609
.
6.
Justak
,
J. F.
, 2002, “
Robust Hydrodynamic Brush Seal
,” U.S. Patent No. 6,428,009.
7.
Justak
,
J. F.
, and
Crudgington
,
P. F.
, 2006, “
Evaluation of a Film Riding Hybrid Seal
,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-4932.
8.
Justak
,
J. F.
, 2007, “
Hydrodynamic Brush Seal
,” U.S. Patent No. 7,182,345.
9.
Benckert
,
H.
, and
Wachter
,
J.
, 1980, “
Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Applications in Turbomachinery
,”
NASA
Report No. CP2133.
10.
Chupp
,
R. E.
, and
Dowler
,
C. A.
, 1993, “
Performance Characteristics of Brush Seals for Limited-Life Engines
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
115
, pp.
390
396
.
11.
Conner
,
J. K.
, and
Childs
,
D.
, 1993, “
Rotordynamic Coefficient Test Results for a Four-Stage Brush Seal
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
9
(
3
), pp.
462
465
.
12.
Basu
,
P.
,
Datta
,
A.
,
Loewenthal
,
R.
, and
Short
,
J.
, 1994, “
Hysteresis and Bristle Stiffening Effects in Brush Seal
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
10
(
4
), pp.
569
575
.
13.
Delgado
,
A.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Justak
,
J.
, 2003, “
Identification of Stiffness and Damping Coefficients in a Shoed Brush Seal
,”
Proceedings of the Seventh Congreso y Exposicion de Latinoamericana Turbomaquinaria
, Veracruz, Mexico, pp.
1
7
.
14.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2005, “
Measurements of Leakage, Structural Stiffness and Energy Dissipation Parameters in a Shoed Brush Seal
,”
Sealing Technol.
,
2005
(
12
), pp.
7
10
.
15.
Delgado
A.
,
San Andrés
L.
, and
Justak
J. F.
, 2004, “
Analysis of Performance and Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Brush Seals With Reverse Rotation Ability
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53614.
16.
Delgado
,
A.
, and
San Andrés
,
L.
, 2007, “
Identification of Structural Stiffness and Damping Coefficients of a Shoed-Brush Seal
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
0739-3717,
129
(
5
), pp.
648
655
.
17.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Baker
,
J.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
, 2009, “
Measurements of Leakage and Power Loss in a Hybrid Brush Seal
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
131
(
1
), p.
012505
.
18.
Baker
,
J.
, 2007, “
Measurements of Leakage, Power Loss and Rotordynamic Force Coefficients in a Hybrid Brush Seal
,” MS thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.
19.
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Baker
,
J.
, and
Delgado
,
A.
, 2008, “
Measurement of Leakage and Identification of Structural Force Coefficients in a Hybrid Brush Seal
,”
Proceedings of the STLE Annual Meeting and Exhibition
, Cleveland, OH, pp.
19
21
.
20.
Coleman
,
H. W.
, and
Steele
,
G. W.
, 1988,
Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers
,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chaps. 1–4.
You do not currently have access to this content.