This paper proposes a novel, multifunctional energy system (MES), in which hydrogen and electricity are cogenerated and about 90% of CO2 is removed. By integrating the methane/steam reforming reaction and combustion of coal, the natural gas and coal are utilized synthetically, and coal is burned to provide high-temperature thermal energy to the methane/steam reforming reaction. Afterwards, the resulting syngas enters a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) unit to separate about 70% of hydrogen, thereby significantly increasing the concentration of carbon dioxide from nearly 20% to 43% in the PSA tail gas. As a result, the overall efficiency of the new system becomes 63.2%. Compared to a conventional natural gas-based hydrogen plant and a coal-firing steam power plant without CO2 removal (the overall efficiency of the two systems is 63.0%), the energy penalty for CO2 removal in the new system is almost totally avoided. Based on the graphical exergy analysis, we propose that the integration of synthetic utilization of fossil fuel (natural gas and coal) and the CO2 removal process plays a significant role in zero energy penalty for CO2 removal and its liquefaction in the MES. The result obtained here provides a new approach for CO2 removal with zero or low thermal efficiency reduction (energy penalty) within an energy system.

1.
Bert
,
M.
,
Ogunlade
,
D.
,
de Heleen
,
C.
,
Manue
,
L.
, and
Leo
,
M.
, 2005, “
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage
,” IPCC Special Report, ISBN 92-9169-119-4.
2.
Gambini
,
M.
, and
Vellini
,
M.
, 2003, “
CO2 Emission Abatement From Fossil Fuel Power Plants by Exhaust Gas Treatment
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
125
, pp.
365
373
.
3.
Smelser
,
S. C.
,
Stock
,
R. M.
,
Mc Cleary
,
G. J.
,
Booras
,
G. S.
, and
Stuart
,
R. J.
, 1991, “
Engineering and Economic Evaluation of CO2 Removal From Fossil-Fuel-Fired Power Plants—Volume 1: Pulverized Coal-Fired Power Plants
,” EPRI Report No. IE-7365.
4.
Giittlicher
,
G.
, and
Pruschek
,
L.
, 1997, “
Comparison of CO2 Removal Systems for Fossil-Fuelled Power Plant Processes
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
38
pp.
s173
s178
.
5.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Mathieu
,
P.
, 1998, “
Comparison of Two CO2 Removal Options in Combined Cycle Power Plants
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
39
, pp.
1653
1663
.
6.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Lozza
,
G.
, 1999, “
CO2 Emission Abatement in IGCC Power Plants by Semi Closed Cycles: Part A—With Oxygen-Blown Combustion
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
121
, pp.
635
641
.
7.
Okawa
,
M.
,
Kimura
,
N.
,
Kiga
,
T.
,
Takano
,
S.
,
Arai
,
K.
, and
Kato
,
M.
, 1997, “
Trial Design for a CO2 Recovery Power Plant by Burning Pulverized Coal in O2∕CO2
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
38
, pp.
S123
S127
.
8.
Chiesa
,
P.
, and
Consonni
,
S.
, 1999, “
Shift Reactors and Physical Absorption for Low-CO2 Emission IGCCs
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
121
, pp.
295
305
.
9.
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2002, “
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part I: Partial Oxidation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
82
88
.
10.
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Chiesa
,
P.
, 2002, “
Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles—Part II: Steam-Methane Reforming
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
124
, pp.
89
95
.
11.
Bolland
,
O.
, and
Undrum
,
H.
, 2003, “
A Novel Methodology for Comparing CO2 Capture Options for Natural Gas-Fired Combined Cycle Plants
,”
Adv. Environ. Res.
1093-0191,
7
, pp.
901
911
.
12.
Jin
,
H.
,
Han
,
W.
, and
Gao
,
L.
, 2006, “
Multi-Functional Energy System (MES) With Multi Fossil Fuels and Multi Products
,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, in press.
13.
Doctor
,
R. D.
,
Molburg
,
J. C.
, and
Thimmapuram
,
P. R.
, 1996, “
KRW Oxygen-Blow Gasification Combined Cycle: Carbon Dioxide Recovery, Transport, and Disposal
,” ANL/ESD-34, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439.
14.
Alie
,
C.
,
Backham
,
L.
,
Croiset
,
E.
, and
Douglas
,
P. L.
, 2005, “
Simulation of CO2 Capture Using MEA Scrubbing: A Flowsheet Decomposition Method
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
0196-8904,
46
, pp.
475
487
.
15.
Geuzebroek
,
F. H.
,
Schneiders
,
L. H.
,
Kraaijveld
,
G. J. C.
, and
Feron
,
P. H. M.
, 2004, “
Exergy Analysis of Alkanolamine-Based CO2 Removal Unit With Aspenplus
,”
Energy
0360-5442,
29
, pp.
1241
1248
.
16.
Kesser
,
K. F.
,
Hoffman
,
M. A.
, and
Baughn
,
J. W.
, 1994, “
Analysis of a Basic Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Power Plant
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
116
(
4
), pp.
277
284
.
17.
Ishida
,
M.
, and
Kawamura
,
K.
, 1982, “
Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Chemical Process System With Distributed Parameters Based on the Energy-Direction Factor Diagram
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev.
0196-4305,
21
, pp.
690
695
.
18.
Chiesa
,
P.
,
Lozza
,
G.
, and
Mazzocchi
,
L.
, 2005, “
Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
127
, pp.
73
80
.
You do not currently have access to this content.