A framework for flutter operability assessment, based upon a new set of similarity parameters, has been developed. This set consists of four parameters which embrace both the performance characteristics in terms of corrected mass flow and corrected speed, and the flight condition in terms of inlet temperature and density (or, equivalently, inlet pressure). It is shown that a combined mass-damping parameter, g/ρ*, novel in the field of turbomachinery aeroelasticity, can summarize the individual effects of mechanical damping, g, and blade mass ratio, μ. A particular selection of four nondimensional parameters, including g/ρ* and a compressible reduced frequency parameter, K*, allows for a decoupling of corrected performance effects from purely aeroelastic effects, for a given machine and a specific modeshape. This view of flutter operability is applied to the analysis of full-scale engine data. The data exhibits the trend that increasing K* and increasing g/ρ* have stabilizing effects, which is consistent with previous work in flutter stability. We propose that these trends hold generally, and apply the trends towards constructing a flutter clearance methodology, a test procedure which satisfies the requirements for comprehensive flutter stability testing.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Structures and Dynamics
Keywords:
aerospace engines, aerospace testing, parameter space methods, aerodynamics, compressible flow, stability, elasticity, damping
Topics:
Flutter (Aerodynamics), Stability, Flight, Clearances (Engineering), Blades, Damping
1.
Sisto, F., and Carta, F. O., eds., 1988, AGARD Manual on Aeroelasticity in Axial-Flow Turbomachines, 1 and 2, AGARDograph No. 298.
2.
Verdon
,
J. M.
,
1993
, “
Review of Unsteady Aerodynamic Methods for Turbomachinery Aeroelastic and Aeroacoustic Applications
,”
AIAA J.
,
31
, pp.
235
–
250
.
3.
Fo¨rsching
,
H.
,
1994
, “
Aeroelastic Stability of Cascades in Turbomachinery
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
30
, pp.
213
–
266
.
4.
Srinivasan
,
A. V.
,
1997
, “
Flutter and Resonant Vibration Characteristics of Engine Blades
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
119
, pp.
742
–
775
.
5.
Jeffers
,
J. D.
, and
Meece
,
C. E.
,
1975
, “
F100 Fan Stall Flutter Problem Review and Solution
,”
J. Aircr.
,
12
, pp.
350
–
357
.
6.
Mehalic, C. M., Hurrel, H. G., Dicus, J. H., Lubomski, J. F., Kurkov, A. P., and Evans, D. G., 1977, “Experimental Results and Data Format of Preliminary Fan Flutter Investigation Using YF100 Engine,” Technical Report, NASA TM SX-3444.
7.
Jutras, R. R., Stallone, M. J., and Bankhead, H. R., 1980, “Experimental Investigation of Flutter in Mid-Stage Compressor Designs,” AIAA Paper 80-0786.
8.
Jutras, R. R., Fost, R. B., Chi, R. M., and Beacher, B. F., 1983, “Subsonic/Transonic Stall Flutter Investigation of a Rotating Rig,” Technical Report, NASA CR-174625.
9.
Stargardter, H., 1979, “Subsonic/Transonic Stall Flutter Study,” Technical Report, NASA CR-165356.
10.
Lane, F., 1956, “System Mode Shapes in the Flutter of Compressor Blade Rows,” J. Aerosp. Sci., pp. 54–66.
11.
Gerolymos
,
G. A.
,
1993
, “
Coupled Three-Dimensional Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Bladed Disks
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
791
–
799
.
12.
Kerrebrock, J. L., 1992, Aircraft Engines and Gas Turbines, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.
13.
Isomura, K., 1996, “A Numerical Investigation of Flutter in a Transonic Fan,” Technical Report, GTL Report 223, M.I.T. Gas Turbine Laboratory.
14.
Vickery, B. J., and Watkins, R. D., 1964, “Flow-Induced Vibrations of Cylindrical Structures,” Proceedings of the First Australian Conference on Hydraulics and Fluid Mechanics, R. Silvester ed., Pergamon Press, New York.
15.
Scruton, C., 1965, “On the Wind-Excited Oscillations of Towers, Stacks, and Masts,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London, pp. 798–836.
16.
Srinivasan, A. V., Cutts, D. G., and Sridhar, S., 1981, “Turbojet Engine Blade Damping,” Technical Report, NASA CR-165406.
17.
Rakowski, W. J., Ellis, D. H., and Bankhead, H. R., 1978, “A Research Program for the Experimental Analysis of Blade Instability,” AIAA/SAE 14th Joint Propulsion Conference.
18.
McCormick, B., 1995, Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
19.
Khalak, A., 2000, “Parametric Dependencies of Aeroengine Flutter for Flutter Clearance Applications,” Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA.
20.
Hall
,
K. C.
,
1993
, “
Deforming Grid Variational Principle for Unsteady Small Disturbance Flows in Cascades
,”
AIAA J.
,
31
, pp.
777
–
787
.
21.
Whitehead, D. S., 1960, “Force and Moment Coefficients for Aerofoils Vibrating in Cascade,” Technical Report R&M 3254, British ARC.
22.
Goldstein
,
M. E.
,
Braun
,
W.
, and
Adamczyk
,
J. J.
,
1977
, “
Unsteady Flow in a Supersonic Cascade With Strong In-Passage Shocks
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
83
, pp.
569
–
604
.
23.
Chi, R. M., 1980, “Unsteady Aerodynamics in Stalled Cascade and Stall Flutter Prediction,” ASME Paper 80-C2/AERO-1.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.