Catalytic combustion has been the subject of thorough research work for over two decades, mainly in the U.S. and Japan. However, severe material problems in the ceramic or metallic monolith prevented regular operation in most cases. Still, during these two decades, turbine inlet temperatures were raised remarkably, and lean premix combustors have become standard in stationary gas turbines. In view of these facts, a simple “monolith-in-tube” concept of a catalytic combustor was adapted for the use in high-temperature gas turbines. Its essential feature is the fact that a considerable portion of the homogeneous gas phase reaction is shifted to the thermal reactor, thus lowering the catalyst temperature. This is achieved by the employment of very short catalyst segments. The viability of this concept has been demonstrated for a variety of pure hydrocarbons, alcohols as well as common liquid fuels. Extensive experimental investigations of the atmospheric combustor led to the assessment of parameters such as reference velocity, fuel-to-air ratio, and fuel properties. The maximum combustor exit temperature was 1673 K with a corresponding catalyst temperature of less than 1300 K for diesel fuel. Boundary conditions were in all cases combustion efficiency (over 99.9 percent) and pressure loss (less than 6 percent). Additionally, a model has been developed to predict the characteristic values of the catalytic combustor such as necessary catalyst length, combustor volume, and emission characteristics. The homogeneous reaction in the thermal reactor can be calculated by a one-dimensional reacting flow model.

1.
Ekstedt, E. E., Lyon, T. F., Sabla, P. E., and Dodds, W. J., 1982, “NASA Clean Catalytic Combustor Program,” ASME Paper No. 82-JPGC-GT-11.
2.
Furuya, T., Hayata, T., Yamanaka, S., Koezuka, J., Yoshine, T., and Ohkoshi, A., 1987, “Hybrid Catalytic Combustion for Stationary Gas Turbine—Concepts and Small Scale Test Results,” ASME Paper No. 87-GT-99.
3.
Glassman, I., 1987, Combustion, 2nd ed., Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
4.
Kawakami, T., Furuya, T., Sasaki, Y., Yoshine, T., Furuse, Y., and Hoshino, M., 1989, “Feasibility Study on Honeycomb Ceramics for Catalytic Combustor,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-41.
5.
Kee, R. J., Miller, J. A., and Jefferson, T. H., 1980, “CHEMKIN: A General-Purpose, Problem-Independent, Transportable, Fortran Chemical Kinetics Code Package,” SAND80-8003, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
6.
Kee, R. J., Grcar, J. F., Smooke, M. D., and Miller, J. A., 1985, “A Fortran Program for Modeling Steady Laminar One-Dimensional Premixed Flames,” SAND85-8240, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
7.
Kitajima, J., and Kajita, S., 1989, “Catalytic Combustor for Small Gas Turbine: Combustor Development,” ASME Paper No. 89-GT-265.
8.
Norton
T. S.
, and
Dryer
F. L.
,
1989
, “
Some New Observations on Methanol Oxidation Chemistry
,”
Combustion Science and Technology
, Vol.
63
, pp.
107
129
.
9.
O¨ser
P.
, and
Brandstetter
W.
,
1984
, “
Grundlagen zur Abgasreinigung von Ottomotoren mit der Katalysatortechnik
,”
Motortechnische Zeitschrift
, Vol.
45
, p.
201ff
201ff
.
10.
Westbrook
C. K.
, and
Pitz
W. J.
,
1984
, “
A Comprehensive Chemical Kinetic Reaction Mechanism for Oxidation and Pyrolysis of Propane and Propene
,”
Combustion Science and Technology
, Vol.
37
, pp.
117
152
.
11.
Wolsing, W. F., Kruse, W., Punke, A., and Rickert, G., 1990, “Tendenzen der Katalysatorentwicklung fu¨r moderne Ottomotoren,” Bericht Fa. Engelhard Kali-Chemie.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.