This study addresses the importance of the different chemical pathways responsible for NOx formation in lean-premixed combustion, and especially the role of the nitrous oxide pathway relative to the traditional Zeldovich pathway. NOx formation is modeled and computed over a range of operating conditions for the lean-premixed primary zone of gas turbine engine combustors. The primary zone, of uniform fuel-air ratio, is modeled as a micromixed well-stirred reactor, representing the flame zone, followed by a series of plug flow reactors, representing the postflame zone. The fuel is methane. The fuel–air equivalence ratio is varied from 0.5 to 0.7.The chemical reactor model permits study of the three pathways by which NOx forms, which are the Zeldovich, nitrous oxide, and prompt pathways. Modeling is also performed for the well-stirred reactor alone. Three recently published, complete chemical kinetic mechanisms for the C1–C2 hydrocarbon oxidation and the NOx formation are applied and compared. Verification of the model is based on the comparison of its NOx output to experimental results published for atmospheric pressure jet-stirred reactors and for a 10 atm. porous-plate burner. Good agreement between the modeled results and the measurements is obtained for most of the jet-stirred reactor operating range. For the porous-plate burner, the model shows agreement to the NOx measurements within a factor of two, with close agreement occurring at the leanest and coolest cases examined. For lean-premixed combustion at gas turbine engine conditions, the nitrous oxide pathway is found to be important, though the Zeldovich pathway cannot be neglected. The prompt pathway, however, contributes small-to-negligible NOx. Whenever the NOx emission is in the 15 to 30 ppmυ (15 percent O2, dry) range, the nitrous oxide pathway is predicted to contribute 40 to 45 percent of the NOx for high-pressure engines (30 atm), and 20 to 35 percent of the NOx for intermediate pressure engines (10 atm). For conditions producing NOx of less than 10 ppmυ (15 percent O2, dry), the nitrous oxide contribution increases steeply and approaches 100 percent. For lean-premixed combustion in the atmospheric pressure jet-stirred reactors, different behavior is found. All three pathways contribute; none can be dismissed. No universal behavior is found for the pressure dependence of the NOx. It does appear, however, that lean-premixed combustors operated in the vicinity of 10 atm have a relatively weak pressure dependence, whereas combustors operated in the vicinity of 30 atm have an approximately square root pressure dependence of the NOx.

1.
Drake
M. C.
, and
Blint
R. J.
, “
Calculations of NOx Formation Pathways in Propagating Laminar, High Pressure Premixed Methane/Air Flames
,”
Combust. Sci. and Tech.
, Vol.
75
,
1991
, p.
261
285
.
2.
Miller
J. A.
, and
Bowman
C. T.
, “
Mechanism and Modeling of Nitrogen Chemistry in Combustion
,”
Prog. in Energy and Combust. Science
, Vol.
15
,
1989
, pp.
287
338
.
3.
Michaud, M. G., Westmoreland, P. R., and Feitelberg, A. S., “Chemical Mechanisms of NOx Formation for Gas Turbine Conditions,” Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1992.
4.
Nicol, D. G., Malte, P. C., Lai, J., Marinov, N. M., Pratt, D. T., and Corr, R. A., “NOx Sensitivities for Gas Turbine Engines Operated on Lean-Premixed Combustion and Conventional Diffusion Flames,” Paper No. 92-GT-115, ASME, New York (1992).
5.
Glarborg
P.
,
Miller
J. A.
, and
Kee
R. J.
, “
Kinetic Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Nitrogen Oxide Formation in Well-Stirred Reactors
,”
Combust. and Flame
, Vol.
65
,
1986
, pp.
177
202
.
6.
Malte, P. C., and Pratt, D. T., “Measurement of Atomic Oxygen and Nitrogen Oxides in Jet-Stirred Combustion,” Proceedings of the Fifteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, pp. 1061–1070.
7.
Corr, R. A., Malte, P. C., and Marinov, N. M., “Evaluation of NOx Mechanisms for Lean, Premixed Combustion,” Paper No. 91-GT-257, ASME, New York (1991).
8.
Bartok, W., Engelman, V. S., Goldstein, R., and del Valle, E. G., in: AIChE Symp. Ser., No. 126, Vol. 68, 1972, p. 30.
9.
Malte, P. C., Schmidt, S. C., and Pratt, D. T., “Hydroxyl Radical and Atomic Oxygen Concentrations in High-Pressure Turbulent Combustion,” Proceedings of the Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1977, pp. 145–155.
10.
Singh, S., Grosshandler, W. L., Malte, P. C., and Crain, W. R., Jr., “Oxides of Nitrogen Formed in High-Intensity Methanol Combustion,” Proceedings of the Seventeenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1979, pp. 689–699.
11.
Leonard, G., and Correa, S., “NOx Formation in Premixed High-Pressure Lean Methane Flames,” in: Proceedings 2nd ASME Fossil Fuel Combustion Symposium, New Orleans, Jan. 14–18, 1990.
12.
Fenimore, C. P., “Formation of Nitric Oxide in Premixed Hydrocarbon Flames” Proceedings of the Thirteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1971, pp. 373–380.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.