Abstract

Cavity flows studied over the past few decades have led to an increased understanding of the flow physics and instability modes in a range of configurations. While a large number of these studies focus on two-dimensional and three-dimensional rectangular/cuboidal cavities, significant variations are seen with three-dimensional cylindrical cavities with a top bounding wall. The present work details the flow physics of such cavities with a compressible (air) flow past the cavity at two pressure drops of 3850 Pa and 2000 Pa. Results from detached eddy simulations (DES) reveal the presence of the wake mode and shear layer instabilities, respectively, with modified dynamics and oscillatory modes owing to the top wall. In the interest of preventing mode switching with changes in operating conditions, which could lead to large-scale flow disruptions, a passive flow control technique is tested. The modified cavity (with a downstream ramp scaled by the size of shed structures) is seen to maintain the same mode throughout the range of operation offering valuable insights into design modifications for such cavities in practical settings.

References

1.
Lawson
,
S. J.
, and
Barakos
,
G. N.
,
2011
, “
Review of Numerical Simulations for High-Speed, Turbulent Cavity Flows
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
47
(
3
), pp.
186
216
.10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.11.002
2.
Skingle
,
C. W.
,
Willcox
,
N. M.
, and
Gaukroger
,
D. R.
,
1968
, “
Measurements of Fluctuating Pressures in and Behind the Bomb Bay of a Canberra Aircraft
,” Aeronautical Research Council Technical Report No.
ARC-CP-1025
. https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/1038
3.
Chung
,
K. M.
,
Lee
,
K. H.
, and
Chang
,
K. C.
,
2017
, “
Characteristics of Cylindrical Cavities in a Compressible Turbulent Flow
,”
Aerosp. Sci. Technol.
,
66
, pp.
160
164
.10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.022
4.
ESDU
,
2000
, “
Drag of a Rectangular Planform Cavity in a Flat Plate With a Turbulent Boundary Layer for Mach Numbers Up to 3. Part I: Closed Flow
,”
ESDU International
, Report No. 00006.
5.
ESDU
,
2000
, “
Drag of a Rectangular Planform Cavity in a Flat Plate With a Turbulent Boundary Layer for Mach Numbers Up to 3. Part II: Open and Transitional Flows
,”
ESDU International
, Report No. 00007.
6.
Rowley
,
C. W.
,
Colonius
,
T.
, and
Basu
,
A. J.
,
2002
, “
On Self-Sustained Oscillations in Two-Dimensional Compressible Flow Over Rectangular Cavities
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
455
, pp.
315
346
.10.1017/S0022112001007534
7.
Brès
,
G.
, and
Colonius
,
T.
,
2007
, “
Direct Numerical Simulations of Three-Dimensional Cavity Flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2007-3405.10.2514/6.2007-3405
8.
Faure
,
T. M.
,
Adrianos
,
P.
,
Lusseyran
,
F.
, and
Pastur
,
L.
,
2007
, “
Visualizations of the Flow Inside an Open Cavity at Medium Range Reynolds Numbers
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
42
(
2
), pp.
169
184
.10.1007/s00348-006-0188-8
9.
Rossiter, J. E., 1964, “Wind-Tunnel Experiments on the Flow Over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds,”
Aeronautical Research Council Report
, Report No. 3428https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/4020.
10.
East
,
L. F.
,
1966
, “
Aerodynamically Induced Resonance in Rectangular Cavities
,”
J. Sound Vib.
,
3
(
3
), pp.
277
287
.10.1016/0022-460X(66)90096-4
11.
Tam
,
C. K.
, and
Block
,
P. J.
,
1978
, “
On the Tones and Pressure Oscillations Induced by Flow Over Rectangular Cavities
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
89
(
2
), pp.
373
399
.10.1017/S0022112078002657
12.
Rossiter
,
J. E.
,
1964
, “
Wind-Tunnel Experiments on the Flow Over Rectangular Cavities at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds
.”https://reports.aerade.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826.2/4020
13.
Hiwada
,
M.
,
Kawamura
,
T.
,
Mabuchi
,
I.
, and
Kumada
,
M.
,
1983
, “
Some Characteristics of Flow Pattern and Heat Transfer Past a Circular Cylindrical Cavity
,”
Bull. JSME
,
26
(
220
), pp.
1744
1752
.10.1299/jsme1958.26.1744
14.
Untaroiu
,
A.
,
Liu
,
C.
,
Migliorini
,
P. J.
,
Wood
,
H. G.
, and
Untaroiu
,
C. D.
,
2014
, “
Hole-Pattern Seals Performance Evaluation Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Design of Experiment Techniques
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
10
), p.
102501
.10.1115/1.4027217
15.
Sekaran
,
A.
,
Morrison
,
G.
, and
Ranjan
,
D.
,
2016
, “
An Inquiry of the Friction Factor “Jump” Phenomenon in Hole-Pattern Seals
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
138
(
8
), p.
081102
.10.1115/1.4033023
16.
Fluent, ANSYS
,
2018
,
Theory Guide 19.2
,
Ansys Inc
., Canonsburg, PA.
17.
Menter
,
F. R.
,
2012
, “
Best Practice: Scale-Resolving Simulations in ANSYS CFD
,” ANSYS Germany GmbH, 1, pp.
1
70
.
18.
Karthick
,
S. K.
,
2021
, “
Shock and Shear Layer Interactions in a Confined Supersonic Cavity Flow
,”
Phys. Fluids
,
33
(
6
), p.
066102
.10.1063/5.0050822
19.
Asirvatham
,
T. D.
,
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Phillips
,
S.
,
2011
, “
Friction Factor Behavior From Flat-Plate Tests of 12.15 mm Diameter Hole-Pattern Roughened Surfaces
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2011-45213.10.1115/GT2011-45213
20.
Gloerfelt
,
X.
,
2009
,
Cavity Noise
(von Karman Institute Lecture Series), Vol.
3
, Arts et Métiers ParisTech, France.
You do not currently have access to this content.