The goal of this study was to determine when patternation information derived from Phase Doppler Analyzer (Dantec Dynamics, Skovlunde, Denmark, dual-PDA) measurements of volume flux, drop velocity, and mean size agreed with corresponding values measured using an optical patternator (Enurga, Inc., West Lafayette, IN, SetScan OP-600). To achieve this, data from each instrument were transformed into spatially resolved absorptances (equivalent to drop surface area per unit spray volume) and compared. Key conclusion is absorptance agreement to within 20% in many cases. However, discrepancies between phase Doppler analyzer (PDA)-calculated and optical patternator-measured absorptances become larger as the drop arrival rate increases, as the mean drop size decreases, and when a significant drop size-velocity correlation is present. These discrepancies are attributed to an underestimation of the volume flux (which becomes more important with increasing droplet arrival rate), an over-reporting of the mean drop diameter (which is the result of the restrictive data acquisition scheme applied when ensuring mass closure for the PDA measurements), the limited PDA dynamic range (which can preclude simultaneously accounting for both the largest and smallest drops in the spray), and by the optical patternator’s number-density based measurement scheme (which will not yield the same results as the flux-based PDA when a drop size-velocity correlation is present).
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: sojka@purdue.edu
Article navigation
June 2010
Research Papers
A Comparison of Phase Doppler Analyzer (Dual-PDA) and Optical Patternator Data for Twin-Fluid and Pressure-Swirl Atomizer Sprays
Ariel R. Muliadi,
Ariel R. Muliadi
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2014
Search for other works by this author on:
Paul E. Sojka,
Paul E. Sojka
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: sojka@purdue.edu
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2014
Search for other works by this author on:
Yudaya R. Sivathanu,
Yudaya R. Sivathanu
En’Urga, Inc.
, West Lafayette, IN 47906
Search for other works by this author on:
Jongmook Lim
Jongmook Lim
En’Urga, Inc.
, West Lafayette, IN 47906
Search for other works by this author on:
Ariel R. Muliadi
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2014
Paul E. Sojka
Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University
, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2014e-mail: sojka@purdue.edu
Yudaya R. Sivathanu
En’Urga, Inc.
, West Lafayette, IN 47906
Jongmook Lim
En’Urga, Inc.
, West Lafayette, IN 47906J. Fluids Eng. Jun 2010, 132(6): 061402 (10 pages)
Published Online: June 23, 2010
Article history
Received:
February 15, 2008
Revised:
November 9, 2009
Online:
June 23, 2010
Published:
June 23, 2010
Citation
Muliadi, A. R., Sojka, P. E., Sivathanu, Y. R., and Lim, J. (June 23, 2010). "A Comparison of Phase Doppler Analyzer (Dual-PDA) and Optical Patternator Data for Twin-Fluid and Pressure-Swirl Atomizer Sprays." ASME. J. Fluids Eng. June 2010; 132(6): 061402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000702
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Disintegration of Oil Jets Emerging From Axial Passages at the Face of a Rotating Cylinder
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2003)
On the Theoretical Prediction of Fuel Droplet Size Distribution in Nonreactive Diesel Sprays
J. Fluids Eng (March,2002)
Reducing Grid Dependency in Droplet Collision Modeling
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2004)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A New Boom Mechanism Design for Corn Sprayer
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (ICMET-London 2011)
Numerical Simulation of Nucleate Spray Cooling: Effect of Droplet Impact on Bubble Growth and Heat Transfer in a Thin Liquid Film
Inaugural US-EU-China Thermophysics Conference-Renewable Energy 2009 (UECTC 2009 Proceedings)
Key Technology of Interactive Music Game Installation based on Arduino
International Conference on Control Engineering and Mechanical Design (CEMD 2017)