The pressure and wake of an inverted cambered aerofoil in ground effect was studied numerically by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. Efforts were focused on the setting up of an accurate numerical model and assessing the abilities of various turbulence models in capturing major physical features associated with the flow, such as surface pressure distribution, separation, level of downforce, and wake. A number of ride heights were studied covering various force regions. Surface pressures, sectional forces, and wake characteristics were compared to experimental data. The kω SST and Realizable kε turbulence models were found to offer good overall simulations, with the kω SST performing better for the surface pressure and the Realizable kε better for the wake. The simulations at various ride heights correctly captured the trends in flow-field variations with ride height. The surface pressures, wake flow field, and region of separation on the suction surface of the aerofoil, at lower ride heights, were all modeled accurately.

1.
Zerihan
,
J. D. C.
and
Zhang
,
X.
, 2000, “
Aerodynamics of a Single Element Wing in Ground Effect
,”
J. Aircr.
0021-8669
37
(
6
), pp.
1058
1064
.
2.
Katz
,
J.
, 1985, “
Calculation of the Aerodynamic Forces on Automotive Lifting Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202
107
, pp.
438
443
.
3.
Ranzenbach
,
R.
and
Barlow
,
J. B.
, 1994, “
Two-Dimensional Airfoil in Ground Effect, An Experimental and Computational Study
,” SAE Paper No. 94-2509.
4.
Ranzenbach
,
R.
and
Barlow
,
J.
, 1996, “
Cambered Airfoil in Ground Effect: An Experimental and Computational Study
,” SAE Paper No. 96-0909.
5.
Zhang
,
X.
and
Zerihan
,
J. D. C.
, 2003, “
Off-Surface Aerodynamic Measurements of a Wing in Ground Effect
,”
J. Aircr.
0021-8669
40
(
4
), pp.
716
725
.
6.
Zerihan
,
J. D. C.
and
Zhang
,
X.
, 2001, “
A Single Element Wing in Ground Effect: Comparisons of Experiments and Computation
,” AIAAPaper 2000-0423, pp. 1–12.
7.
Spalart
,
P. R.
and
Allmaras
,
S. R.
, 1992, “
A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows
,” AIAA Paper No. 92-0439.
8.
Menter
,
F. R.
, 1994, “
Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452
32
(
8
), pp.
1598
1605
.
9.
Lawson
,
N. J.
,
Knowles
,
K.
,
Hart
,
R. J. E.
,
Wray
,
J. N.
, and
Eyles
,
J. M.
, 2002, “
An Experimental Investigation Using PIV of the Underflow of a GA(W)-1 Aerofoil Section in Ground Effect
,”
Proc. of the 4th MIRA International Vehicle Aerodynamics Conference, 16-17 October
,
MIRA
, Warwick, pp. 1–14.
10.
Zerihan
,
J. D. C.
, 2001. “
An Investigation Into the Aerodynamics of Wings in Ground Effect
,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
11.
Launder
,
B. E.
and
Spalding
,
D. B.
, 1974. “
The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825
3
, pp.
269
289
.
12.
Wilcox
,
D. C.
, 1988, “
Multiscale Models for Turbulent Flows
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452
26
(
11
), pp.
1311
1320
.
13.
Yakhot
,
A.
and
Orszag
,
S.
, 1986, “
Renormalisation Group Analysis of Turbulence: I Basic Theory
,”
J. Sci. Comput.
0885-7474
1
(
1
), pp.
1
51
.
14.
Shih
,
T-H
,
Liou
,
W. W
,
Shabbir
,
A.
,
Yang
,
Z.
, and
Zhu
,
J.
, 1995, “
A New k−ϵ Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows
,”
Comput. Fluids
0045-7930
24
, pp.
227
238
.
15.
Burgin
,
K.
,
Adey
,
P. C.
, and
Beatham
,
J. P.
, 1986, “
Wind Tunnel Tests on Road Vehicle Models Using a Moving Belt Simulation of Ground Effect
,”
J. Wind. Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.
0167-6105
22
, pp.
227
236
.
You do not currently have access to this content.