Some oil pump station design layouts may contain multiple dead-legs. During the transportation of heavy crude through the pump station, these dead-legs will be filled with this crude. When a light crude batch is introduced next into the pipeline, following the heavy crude ahead, two phenomena will occur. First, contamination between batches at the interface of the two crudes will occur due to axial turbulent diffusion along the length of the pipeline itself. Second, as the light crude flows through the pump station and passes by each dead-leg containing still heavy crude from the preceding batch, the heavy crude trapped in these dead-legs will start to drain out into the passing light crude in the main run. This causes further contamination and spreading of the mixing zone between the two batches. These two different sources of contamination are addressed in this paper with the objective of accurately quantifying the extent of the contamination, with particular emphasis on the second phenomenon which could cause appreciable contamination particularly for large size and number of these dead-legs. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model has been developed to quantify the drainage rate of the contaminating crude into the main stream and its impact on widening the mixed zone (contamination spread) between the two batches. Two drainage mechanisms of the heavy crude in the dead-legs into the main stream of the light crude have been identified and quantified. The initial phase is a gravity-current-induced outflow of the initially stagnant fluid in the dead-leg, followed by a subsequent draining mechanism primarily induced by turbulent mixing and diffusion at the mouth of the dead-leg penetrating slightly into the dead-leg. It was found that the second mechanism takes a much longer time to drain the first, and that the break point in time where drainage switches from a predominantly gravity current to a turbulent diffusion appears to be at a specific time normalized with respect to the length of the dead-leg and the gravity current speed. The results show a consistent trend with actual interface contamination data obtained from the Keystone 2982 km pipeline from Hardisty (Canada) to the Patoka Terminal (U.S.A.).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2016
Research-Article
Interfacial Contamination Between Batches of Crude Oil Due to Dead-Legs in Pump Station Piping
K. K. Botros,
K. K. Botros
NOVA Chemicals,
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
e-mail: kamal.botros@novachem.com
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
e-mail: kamal.botros@novachem.com
Search for other works by this author on:
E. J. Clavelle,
E. J. Clavelle
NOVA Chemicals,
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
G. M. Vogt
G. M. Vogt
TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.,
Calgary, AB T2P 5H1, Canada
Calgary, AB T2P 5H1, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
K. K. Botros
NOVA Chemicals,
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
e-mail: kamal.botros@novachem.com
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
e-mail: kamal.botros@novachem.com
E. J. Clavelle
NOVA Chemicals,
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
Centre for Applied Research,
Calgary, AB T2E 7K7, Canada
G. M. Vogt
TransCanada Pipelines Ltd.,
Calgary, AB T2P 5H1, Canada
Calgary, AB T2P 5H1, Canada
Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received October 26, 2015; final manuscript received March 31, 2016; published online May 12, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Christopher J. Wajnikonis.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Sep 2016, 138(5): 052908 (8 pages)
Published Online: May 12, 2016
Article history
Received:
October 26, 2015
Revised:
March 31, 2016
Citation
Botros, K. K., Clavelle, E. J., and Vogt, G. M. (May 12, 2016). "Interfacial Contamination Between Batches of Crude Oil Due to Dead-Legs in Pump Station Piping." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. September 2016; 138(5): 052908. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033401
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
CFD Numerical Simulation of the Submarine Pipeline With a Spoiler
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (August,2009)
Erratum: “Computation of Particle and Scalar Transport for Complex Geometry Turbulent Flows” [ASME J. Fluids Engineering, 123 , No. 2, pp. 372–381]
J. Fluids Eng (September,2001)
Flow and Deposition Characteristics Following Chokes for Pressurized CO 2 Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (July,2018)
Experimental Study of Low Concentration Sand Transport in Multiphase Air–Water Horizontal Pipelines
J. Energy Resour. Technol (May,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
CFD Simulations of a Mixed-flow Pump Using Various Turbulence Models
Mixed-flow Pumps: Modeling, Simulation, and Measurements
Pipeline Integrity and Security
Continuing and Changing Priorities of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes and Standards
Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline Design & Construction: A Practical Approach, Third Edition