Materials such as added clays, weight materials, drill solids, and metallic wear products in the drilling fluid are known to distort the geomagnetic field at the location of the measurement while drilling (MWD) tool magnetometers that are used to measure the direction of well path. This distortion contributes to substantial errors in determination of azimuth while drilling deviated wells. These errors may result in missing the target of a long deviated 12 ¼ in. section in the range of 1–200 m, representing a significant cost to be mitigated. The error becomes even more pronounced if drilling occurs in arctic regions close to the magnetic north pole (or south pole). The effect on the magnetometer readings is obviously linked to the kinds and amounts of magnetic materials in the drilling fluid. The problem has recently been studied by laboratory experiments and analyses of downhole survey data. A series of experiments has been carried out to understand how some drilling fluid additives relate to the magnetic distortion. Experiments with free iron ions show that presence of iron ions does not contribute to magnetic distortion, while experiments with bentonite-based fluids show a strong effect of bentonite on magnetic shielding. Albeit earlier measurements showing a strong dependency of the content of organophilic clay, clean laboratory prepared oil-based drilling fluids show no increased shielding when adding organophilic hectorite clays. The anticipated difference between these two cases is outlined in the paper. When eroded steel from an offshore drilling site is added into the oil-based drilling fluid, it is found that these swarf and steel fines significantly increase the magnetic shielding of the drilling fluid. The paper outlines how the drilling direction may be distorted by the presence of these additives and contaminants and how this relates to the rheological properties of the drilling fluid.

References

1.
Torkildsen
,
T.
,
Edvardsen
,
I.
,
Fjogstad
,
A.
,
Saasen
,
A.
,
Amundsen
,
P. A.
, and
Omland
,
T. H.
,
2004
, “
Drilling Fluid Affects MWD Magnetic Azimuth and Wellbore Position
,”
SPE/IADC
Paper No. 87169.
2.
Wilson
,
H.
, and
Brooks
,
A. G.
,
2001
, “
Wellbore Position Errors Caused by Drilling Fluid Contamination
,”
SPE
Paper No. 71400.
3.
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
Torkildsen
,
T.
, and
Saasen
,
A.
,
2006
, “
Shielding of Directional Magnetic Sensor Readings in a Measurement While Drilling Tool for Oil Well Positioning
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
343
345
.
4.
Ekseth
,
R.
,
1998
, “
Uncertainties in Connection With the Determination of Wellbore Positions
,” Ph.D. thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
5.
Williamson
,
H. S.
,
1999
, “
Accuracy Prediction for Directional MWD
,”
SPE
Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
, Houston, TX, Oct. 3–6, Paper No. SPE 56702.
6.
Torkildsen
,
T.
, and
Lotsberg
,
O.
,
2001
, “
Acceptance Values for MWD Magnetic Wellbore Surveying
,”
13th ISCWSA Meeting
, Haarlem, The Netherlands, Mar. 2.
7.
Kasumov
,
R.
,
Houvet
,
J.
, and
Kasumov
,
T.
,
2010
, “
Gyro While Drilling Technology—Solution for Directional Top Hole Drilling
,”
IADC/SPE
Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition
, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, Nov. 1–3, Paper No. SPE-135910-MS.
8.
Stratton
,
J. A.
,
1941
,
Electromagnetic Theory
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
, Chap. 4.
9.
Jackson
,
J. D.
,
1998
,
Classical Electrodynamics
, 3rd ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
, Chap. 5.
10.
Evans
,
D. F.
,
1959
, “
The Determination of the Paramagnetic Susceptibility of Substances in Solution by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
,”
J. Chem. Soc.
,
1959
, pp.
2003
2005
.
11.
Mitchell
,
J.
,
Chandrasekera
,
T. C.
,
Holland
,
D. J.
,
Gladdena
,
L. F.
, and
Fordhamb
,
E. J.
,
2013
, “
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Laboratory Petro-Physical Core Analysis
,”
Phys. Rep.
,
526
(
3
), pp.
165
225
.
12.
Waag
,
T. I.
,
Torkildsen
,
T.
,
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
Nyrnes
,
E.
, and
Saasen
,
A.
,
2012
, “
The Design of BHA and the Placement of the Magnetometer Sensors Influence How Magnetic Azimuth is Distorted by the Magnetic Properties of Drilling Fluids
,”
SPE Drill. Completions
,
27
(3), pp.
392
405
.
13.
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
Ding
,
S.
,
Datta
,
B. K.
,
Torkildsen
,
T.
, and
Saasen
,
A.
,
2010
, “
Magnetic Shielding During MWD Azimuth Measurements and Wellbore Positioning
,”
SPE Drill. Completion
,
25
(02), pp.
219
222
.
14.
Ding
,
S.
,
von Hafenbrädl
,
F.
, and
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
2008
, “
Preliminary Investigation Into Magnetite Powder's Magnetic Shielding Effect on Drilling Fluid
,” RELPOWFLO IV, Tromsø, Norway, June 10–12, pp.
779
784
.
15.
Ding
,
S.
,
Datta
,
B. K.
,
Saasen
,
A.
, and
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
2010
, “
Experimental Investigation of the Magnetic Shielding Effect of Mineral Powders in a Drilling Fluid
,”
Part. Sci. Technol.
,
28
(
1
), pp.
86
94
.
16.
Tellefsen
,
K.
,
Ding
,
S.
,
Saasen
,
A.
,
Amundsen
,
P. A.
,
Fjogstad
,
A.
, and
Torkildsen
,
T.
,
2012
, “
The Effect of Drilling Fluid Content on Magnetic Shielding of Downhole Compasses in MWDs
,”
SPE
Paper No. 150548.
17.
Jeans
,
J.
,
1933
,
The Mathematical Theory of Electricity and Magnetism
, 5th ed.,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
18.
Reif
,
F.
,
1965
,
Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
19.
van Olphen
,
H.
,
1977
,
An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry
, 2nd ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
.
20.
Breakwell
,
I. K.
,
Homer
,
J.
,
Lawrence
,
M. A. M.
, and
Mcwhinnie
,
W. R.
,
1995
, “
Studies of Organophilic Clays: The Distribution of Quaternary Ammonium Compounds on Clay Surfaces and the Role of Impurities
,”
Polyhedron
,
14
(17–18), pp.
2511
2518
.
You do not currently have access to this content.