Recently reported finite-dimensional nonlinear thruster models employing empirically determined lift–drag curves have been shown to accurately model both the transient and steady state response of marine thrusters. These reports have employed the standard off-line paradigm for model parameter identification: First, real-time sensor data (force, torque, fluid velocity) is logged in laboratory experiments. Second, the experimental data is analyzed with a least-square regression technique to complete a best fit for the model parameters. This paper reports an on-line technique for adaptive identification of model parameters for marine thrusters. The stability of the proposed technique is shown analytically. The performance of the on-line adaptive identification technique, evaluated with respect to an experimentally validated plant model, is shown to compare favorably to its off-line counterpart, but does not require the thrust and torque instrumentation required by conventional off-line least-squares parameter identification techniques.

1.
Yoerger
,
D. R.
,
Cooke
,
J. G.
, and
Slotine
,
J. E.
,
1990
, “
The influence of thruster dynamics on underwater vehicle behavior and their incorporation into control system design
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
15
(
3
),
167
167
.
2.
Healey
,
A. J.
,
Rock
,
S. M.
,
Cody
,
S.
,
Miles
,
D.
, and
Brown
,
J. P.
,
1995
, “
Toward and improved understanding of thruster dynamics for underwater vehicles
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
20
(
4
),
354
354
.
3.
Whitcomb
,
L. L.
, and
Yoerger
,
D. R.
,
1999
, “
Development, comparison, and preliminary experimental validation of nonlinear dynamic thruster models
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
24
(
4
),
481
481
.
4.
Whitcomb
,
L. L.
, and
Yoerger
,
D. R.
,
1999
, “
Preliminary experiments in model-based thruster control for underwater vehicle positioning
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
24
(
4
),
495
495
.
5.
Bachmayer
,
R.
,
Whitcomb
,
L. L.
, and
Grosenbaugh
,
M. A.
,
2000
, “
An accurate four-quadrant nonlinear dynamical model for marine thrusters: Theory and experimental validation
,”
IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.
,
25
(
1
),
146
146
.
6.
Bachmayer, R., Whitcomb, L., Nakamura, M., and Grosenbaugh, M., 1997, “Unsteady three-axis force, torque and flow dynamical modeling and experiments with marine thrusters,” in The 10th International Symposium on Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology.
7.
Bachmayer, R., and Whitcomb, L. L., 2001, “Adaptive parameter identification of an accurate nonlinear dynamical model for marine thrusters,” Technical Report 2001-11, Dynamical Systems and Control Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. HTTP://robotics.me.jhu.edu/w˜ww.
8.
Narendra, K., and Annaswamy, A., 1988, Stable Adaptive Systems, Prentice-Hall, NY.
9.
Sastry, S., and Bodson, M. 1989, Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence, and Robustness, Prentice-Hall.
10.
Khalil, H. K., 1996, Nonlinear Systems, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
11.
Orlov
,
Y.
, and
Bentsman
,
J.
,
2000
, “
Adaptive distributed parameter systems identification with enforceable identifiability conditions and reduced-order spatial differentation
,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control
,
45
(
2
),
203
203
.
You do not currently have access to this content.