Rotator cuff tears are a significant clinical problem previously investigated by unvalidated computational models that either use simplified geometry or isotropic elastic material properties to represent the tendon. The objective of this study was to develop an experimentally validated, finite element model of supraspinatus tendon using specimen-specific geometry and inhomogeneous material properties to predict strains in intact supraspinatus tendon at multiple abduction angles. Three-dimensional tendon surface strains were determined at 60 deg, 70 deg, and 90 deg of glenohumeral abduction for articular and bursal surfaces of supraspinatus tendon during cyclic loading (5–200 N, 50 cycles, 20 mm/min) to serve as validation data for computational model predictions. A finite element model was developed using the tendon geometry and inhomogeneous material properties to predict surface strains for loading conditions mimicking experimental loading conditions. Experimental strains were directly compared with computational model predictions to validate the model. Overall, the model successfully predicted magnitudes of strains that were within the experimental repeatability of 3% strain of experimental measures on both surfaces of the tendon. Model predictions and experiments showed the largest strains to be located on the articular surface (∼8% strain) between the middle and the anterior edge of the tendon. Importantly, the reference configuration chosen to calculate strains had a significant effect on strain calculations, and therefore, must be defined with an innovative optimization algorithm. This study establishes a rigorously validated specimen-specific (both geometry and material properties) computational model using novel surface strain measurements for the use in investigating the function of the supraspinatus tendon and to ultimately predict the propagation of supraspinatus tendon tears based on the tendon's mechanical environment.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 2019
Research-Article
A Validated, Specimen-Specific Finite Element Model of the Supraspinatus Tendon Mechanical Environment
R. Matthew Miller,
R. Matthew Miller
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
James Thunes,
James Thunes
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Volker Musahl,
Volker Musahl
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Spandan Maiti,
Spandan Maiti
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard E. Debski
Richard E. Debski
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Matthew Miller
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
James Thunes
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Volker Musahl
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Spandan Maiti
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Richard E. Debski
Orthopaedic Robotics Laboratory,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Bioengineering,
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
Swanson School of Engineering,
University of Pittsburgh,
408 Center for Bioengineering,
300 Technology Drive,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
University of Pittsburgh,
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
1Corresponding author.
Manuscript received May 6, 2018; final manuscript received May 24, 2019; published online July 30, 2019. Assoc. Editor: David Corr.
J Biomech Eng. Nov 2019, 141(11): 111003 (8 pages)
Published Online: July 30, 2019
Article history
Received:
May 6, 2018
Revised:
May 24, 2019
Citation
Matthew Miller, R., Thunes, J., Musahl, V., Maiti, S., and Debski, R. E. (July 30, 2019). "A Validated, Specimen-Specific Finite Element Model of the Supraspinatus Tendon Mechanical Environment." ASME. J Biomech Eng. November 2019; 141(11): 111003. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043872
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
The Effect of Size and Location of Tears in the Supraspinatus Tendon on Potential Tear Propagation
J Biomech Eng (August,2015)
Biaxial Tensile Testing and Constitutive Modeling of Human Supraspinatus Tendon
J Biomech Eng (February,2012)
Determination of the Compressive Material Properties of the Supraspinatus Tendon
J Biomech Eng (February,2001)
Effect of Supraspinatus Tendon Repair Technique on the Infraspinatus Tendon
J Biomech Eng (March,2011)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
A comparison of the Integrated Uptake Biokinetic Model to Traditional Risk Assessment Approaches for Environmental Lead
Superfund Risk Assessment in Soil Contamination Studies
Appendix F—Tendon End Anchor Testing
Commentary on Article CC-3000 Design