Tendons function to transmit loads from muscle to move and stabilize joints and absorb impacts. Functionality of lacerated tendons is diminished, however clinical practice often considers surgical repair only after 50% or more of the tendon is lacerated, the “50% rule.” Few studies provide mechanical insight into the 50% rule. In this study cyclic and static stress relaxation tests were performed on porcine flexor tendons before and after a 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, or 2.75 mm deep transverse, midsubstance laceration. Elastic and viscoelastic properties, such as maximum stress, change in stress throughout each test, and stiffness, were measured and compared pre- and post-laceration. Nominal stress and stiffness parameters decreased, albeit disproportionately in magnitude, with increasing percent loss of cross-sectional area. Conversely, mean stress at the residual area (determined using remaining intact area at the laceration cross section) exhibited a marked increase in stress concentration beginning at 47.2% laceration using both specified load and constant strain analyses. The marked increase in stress concentration beginning near 50% laceration provides mechanical insight into the 50% rule. Additionally, a drastic decrease in viscoelastic stress parameters after only an 8.2% laceration suggests that time-dependent mechanisms protecting tissues during impact loadings are highly compromised regardless of laceration size.
Skip Nav Destination
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Materials Science Program,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
Article navigation
January 2013
Research-Article
Mechanical Compromise of Partially Lacerated Flexor Tendons
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl,
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl
Department of Biomedical Engineering
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Roderic Lakes,
Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
Roderic Lakes
Materials Science Program
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
WI 53705
Search for other works by this author on:
Ray Vanderby
Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Materials Science Program,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
Ray Vanderby
, Jr.
Department of Biomedical Engineering
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53705
Materials Science Program,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53705
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Sarah Duenwald-Kuehl
Department of Biomedical Engineering
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
WI 53705
Roderic Lakes
Materials Science Program
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Engineering Physics,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison,
WI 53705
Ray Vanderby
, Jr.
Department of Biomedical Engineering
,University of Wisconsin-Madison
,Madison, WI 53705
;Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53705
Materials Science Program,
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Madison, WI 53705
e-mail: vanderby@ortho.wisc.edu
Contributed by the Bioengineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Manuscript received June 5, 2012; final manuscript received November 2, 2012; accepted manuscript posted November 28, 2012; published online December 26, 2012. Editor: Victor H. Barocas.
J Biomech Eng. Jan 2013, 135(1): 011001 (8 pages)
Published Online: December 26, 2012
Article history
Received:
June 5, 2012
Revision Received:
November 2, 2012
Accepted:
November 28, 2012
Citation
Kondratko, J., Duenwald-Kuehl, S., Lakes, R., and Vanderby, R. (December 26, 2012). "Mechanical Compromise of Partially Lacerated Flexor Tendons." ASME. J Biomech Eng. January 2013; 135(1): 011001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023092
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Analysis of Transient Cutting Forces in Cortical Bone During Ultrasonically Assisted Cutting
J Biomech Eng (June 2025)
Related Articles
Recruitment Viscoelasticity of the Tendon
J Biomech Eng (November,2009)
Tendon Fascicles Exhibit a Linear Correlation Between Poisson's Ratio and Force During Uniaxial Stress Relaxation
J Biomech Eng (March,2013)
Nonlinear Model for Viscoelastic Behavior of Achilles Tendon
J Biomech Eng (November,2010)
Experimental Characterization and Finite Element Implementation of Soft Tissue Nonlinear Viscoelasticity
J Biomech Eng (November,2012)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Appendix F—Tendon End Anchor Testing
Commentary on Article CC-3000 Design
Tendon End Anchor Testing
Commentary on Articles CC-2000, CC-3000 and CC-4000
Creating and Eliminating Workplace Hazards by Design
An Instructional Aid For Occupational Safety and Health in Mechanical Engineering Design