Inconclusive findings regarding the collagen fiber architecture and the material properties of the glenohumeral capsule make it unclear whether the material symmetry of the glenohumeral capsule is isotropic or anisotropic. The overall objective of this work was to use a combined experimental and computational protocol to characterize the mechanical properties of the axillary pouch of the glenohumeral capsule and to determine the appropriate material symmetry. Two perpendicular tensile and finite simple shear deformations were applied to a series of tissue samples from the axillary pouch of the glenohumeral capsule. An inverse finite element optimization routine was then used to determine the material coefficients for an isotropic hyperelastic constitutive model by simulating the experimental conditions. There were no significant differences between the material coefficients obtained from the two perpendicular tensile deformations or finite simple shear deformations. Furthermore, stress-stretch relationships predicted by utilizing the material coefficients from one direction were able to predict the responses of the same tissue sample in the perpendicular direction. These similarities between the longitudinal and transverse material behaviors of the tissue imply that the capsule may be considered an isotropic material. However, differences did exist between the material coefficients obtained from the tensile and shear loading conditions. Therefore, a more advanced constitutive model is needed to predict both the tensile and shear responses of the material.
Skip Nav Destination
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
Article navigation
March 2009
Research Papers
Material Properties of the Axillary Pouch of the Glenohumeral Capsule: Is Isotropic Material Symmetry Appropriate? Available to Purchase
Eric J. Rainis,
Eric J. Rainis
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Steve A. Maas,
Steve A. Maas
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Search for other works by this author on:
Heath B. Henninger,
Heath B. Henninger
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick J. McMahon,
Patrick J. McMahon
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Jeffrey A. Weiss,
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Search for other works by this author on:
Richard E. Debski, Ph.D.
Richard E. Debski, Ph.D.
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Search for other works by this author on:
Eric J. Rainis
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Steve A. Maas
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Heath B. Henninger
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Patrick J. McMahon
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219
Jeffrey A. Weiss
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Bioengineering, and Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute,
University of Utah
, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Richard E. Debski, Ph.D.
Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering,
University of Pittsburgh
, Pittsburgh, PA 15219e-mail: genesis1@pitt.edu
J Biomech Eng. Mar 2009, 131(3): 031007 (7 pages)
Published Online: January 6, 2009
Article history
Received:
October 22, 2007
Revised:
August 18, 2008
Published:
January 6, 2009
Citation
Rainis, E. J., Maas, S. A., Henninger, H. B., McMahon, P. J., Weiss, J. A., and Debski, R. E. (January 6, 2009). "Material Properties of the Axillary Pouch of the Glenohumeral Capsule: Is Isotropic Material Symmetry Appropriate?." ASME. J Biomech Eng. March 2009; 131(3): 031007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3005169
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
A Modular, Mechanical Knee Model for the Development and Validation of Robotic Testing Methodologies
J Biomech Eng (July 2025)
Multiphysics Simulations of a Bioprinted Pulsatile Fontan Conduit
J Biomech Eng (July 2025)
Personalized Parameter Setting in Musculoskeletal Models Through Multitrajectory Optimization
J Biomech Eng (August 2025)
Related Articles
Simulated Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Deformation under Quasi-Static Loading
J Biomech Eng (November,2005)
Computational Model of the Cerebral Ventricles in Hydrocephalus
J Biomech Eng (May,2010)
An Axisymmetric Boundary Element Model for Determination of Articular Cartilage Pericellular Matrix Properties In Situ via Inverse Analysis of Chondron Deformation
J Biomech Eng (March,2010)
Simple Shear Testing of Parallel-Fibered Planar Soft Tissues
J Biomech Eng (April,2001)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Fatigue Analysis in the Connecting Rod of MF285 Tractor by Finite Element Method
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)
Introduction
Ultrasonic Methods for Measurement of Small Motion and Deformation of Biological Tissues for Assessment of Viscoelasticity
Data Tabulations
Structural Shear Joints: Analyses, Properties and Design for Repeat Loading