The mechanical properties of the adult human skull are well documented, but little information is available for the infant skull. To determine the age-dependent changes in skull properties, we tested human and porcine infant cranial bone in three-point bending. The measurement of elastic modulus in the human and porcine infant cranial bone agrees with and extends previous published data [McPherson, G. K., and Kriewall, T. J. (1980), J. Biomech., 13, pp. 9–16] for human infant cranial bone. After confirming that the porcine and human cranial bone properties were comparable, additional tensile and three-point bending studies were conducted on porcine cranial bone and suture. Comparisons of the porcine infant data with previously published adult human data demonstrate that the elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and energy absorbed to failure increase, and the ultimate strain decreases with age for cranial bone. Likewise, we conclude that the elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and energy absorbed to failure increase with age for sutures. We constructed two finite element models of an idealized one-month old infant head, one with pediatric and the other adult skull properties, and subjected them to impact loading to investigate the contribution of the cranial bone properties on the intracranial tissue deformation pattern. The computational simulations demonstrate that the comparatively compliant skull and membranous suture properties of the infant brain case are associated with large cranial shape changes, and a more diffuse pattern of brain distortion than when the skull takes on adult properties. These studies are a fundamental initial step in predicting the unique mechanical response of the pediatric skull to traumatic loads associated with head injury and, thus, for defining head injury thresholds for children. [S0148-0731(00)00904-3]

1.
McPherson
,
G. K.
, and
Kriewall
,
T. J.
,
1980
, “
The Elastic Modulus of Fetal Cranial Bone: A First Step Towards an Understanding of the Biomechanics of Fetal Head Molding
,”
J. Biomech.
,
13
, pp.
9
16
.
2.
Kriewall
,
T. K.
, et al.
,
1981
, “
Bending Properties and Ash Content of Fetal Cranial Bone
,”
J. Biomech.
,
14
, pp.
73
79
.
3.
Kriewall
,
T. J.
,
1982
, “
Structural, Mechanical, and Material Properties of Fetal Cranial Bone
,”
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
,
143
, pp.
707
714
.
4.
Dejeammes, M., et al., 1984, “Exploration of Biomechanical Data Towards a Better Evaluation of Tolerance for Children Involved in Automotive Accidents,” SAE 840530 pp. 427–440.
5.
Duhaime
,
A. C.
, et al.
,
1987
, “
The Shaken Baby Syndrome—A Clinical Pathological, and Biomechanical Study
,”
J. Neurosurg.
,
66
, pp.
409
415
.
6.
Stu¨rtz, G., 1980, “Biomechanical Data of Children,” SAE Paper No. 801313.
7.
Mohan
,
D.
,
Bowman
,
B. M.
,
Snyder
,
R. G.
, and
Fourst
,
D. R.
,
1979
, “
A Biomechanical Analysis of Head Impact Injuries to Children
,”
ASME J. Biomech. Eng.
,
101
, pp.
250
260
.
8.
Hubbard
,
R. P.
,
1971
, “
Flexure of Layered Cranial Bone
,”
J. Biomech.
,
4
, pp.
251
263
.
9.
McElhaney
,
J. H.
, et al.
,
1970
, “
Mechanical Properties of Cranial Bone
,”
J. Biomech.
,
3
, pp.
495
511
.
10.
Thibault
,
K. L.
, and
Margulies
,
S. S.
,
1998
, “
Age-Dependent Material Properties of Porcine Cerebrum: Effect on Pediatric Inertial Head Injury Criteria
,”
J. Biomech.
,
31
, pp.
1119
1126
.
11.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N., 1951, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw-Hill, New York.
12.
Datsko, J., 1986, “Solid Materials,” in: Shigley J. E., and Mischke, C. R., eds., Standard Handbook of Machine Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 7.
13.
Margulies
,
S. S.
,
Thibault
,
L. E.
, and
Gennarelli
,
T. A.
,
1990
, “
Physical Model Simulations of Brain Injury in the Primate
,”
J. Biomech.
,
23
, pp.
823
836
.
14.
Shreiber, D. I., Bain, A. C., and Meaney, D., 1997, “In Vivo Thresholds for Mechanical Injury to the Blood–Brain Barrier,” Proc. 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp. 277–291.
15.
Gennarelli, T. A., and Meaney, D. F., 1996, “Primary Head Injury Mechanisms,” in: Neurosurgery, 2, Wiekens, B., ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 2611–2621.
16.
Dickerson
,
J. W. T.
, and
Dobbing
,
J.
,
1966
, “
Prenatal and Postnatal Growth and Development of the Central Nervous System of the Pig
,”
Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B
,
166
, pp.
384
395
.
17.
Dobbing, J., 1964, “The Later Development of the Brain and Its Vulnerability,” in: Scientific Foundations of Paediatrics, Davis, J. A., and Dobbings, J., eds., Heinemann Medical, London.
18.
Johnson
,
A. F.
, and
Sims
,
G. D.
,
1986
, “
Mechanical Properties and Design of Sandwich Materials
,”
Composites
,
17
, No.
4
, pp.
321
328
.
19.
Wood
,
J. L.
,
1971
, “
Dynamic Response of Human Cranial Bone
,”
J. Biomech.
,
4
, pp.
1
12
.
20.
Hubbard
,
R. P.
, et al.
,
1971
, “
Flexure of Cranial Sutures
,”
J. Biomech.
,
4
, pp.
491
496
.
21.
Jaslow
,
C. R.
,
1990
, “
Mechanical Properties of Cranial Sutures
,”
J. Biomech.
,
23
, No.
4
, pp.
313
321
.
22.
Wainwright, S. A., et al., 1976, Mechanical Design of Organisms, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
23.
Evans
,
F. G.
, and
Lissner
,
H. R.
,
1957
, “
Tensile and Compressive Strength of Human Parietal Bone
,”
J. Appl. Physiol.
,
10
, pp.
493
497
.
24.
Melvin
,
J. W.
, et al.
,
1969
, “
The Mechanical Behavior of the Diploe¨ Layer of the Human Skull in Compression
,” Development in Mechanics: Proc. Midwestern Mechanics Conference,
5
, pp.
811
818
.
You do not currently have access to this content.